Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

[fsquid]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

have to forget about it and move on to Miami. Must take 2 out of 3 there.

[samjjones]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

Phillies did not impress me at all this series. They have more holes in their staff than the Mets do. Millwood is not a top of the rotation guy anymore. Outside of Abreu and Thome, there is nobody in the lineup that scares me (OK, Burrell does, but thats only against the Mets). And Bowa is Bobby V. times three.

[samjjones]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

Phillies did not impress me at all this series. They have more holes in their staff than the Mets do. Millwood is not a top of the rotation guy anymore. Outside of Abreu and Thome, there is nobody in the lineup that scares me (OK, Burrell does, but thats only against the Mets). And Bowa is Bobby V. times three.

[samjjones]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

Phillies did not impress me at all this series. They have more holes in their staff than the Mets do. Millwood is not a top of the rotation guy anymore. Outside of Abreu and Thome, there is nobody in the lineup that scares me (OK, Burrell does, but thats only against the Mets). And Bowa is Bobby V. times three.

[PdiddyPop]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
fsquid said:
have to forget about it and move on to Miami. Must take 2 out of 3 there.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

if ever a time the Fish need to step up its now. the only silver lining is we own the East with the exception of the braves.

[PdiddyPop]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
fsquid said:
have to forget about it and move on to Miami. Must take 2 out of 3 there.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

if ever a time the Fish need to step up its now. the only silver lining is we own the East with the exception of the braves.

[PdiddyPop]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
fsquid said:
have to forget about it and move on to Miami. Must take 2 out of 3 there.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

if ever a time the Fish need to step up its now. the only silver lining is we own the East with the exception of the braves.

[philliesfan980]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
samjjones said:
Phillies did not impress me at all this series. They have more holes in their staff than the Mets do. Millwood is not a top of the rotation guy anymore. Outside of Abreu and Thome, there is nobody in the lineup that scares me (OK, Burrell does, but thats only against the Mets). And Bowa is Bobby V. times three.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I don't disagree with your statement. Right now the Mets staff is better than the Phillies staff (Starting staff that is). And I agree that outside of Burrell, Thome, and Abreu, nobody really scares you, but really you can say the same thing about the Mets.

Outside of Piazza , Floyd (sometimes, very streaky), there's nobody else in that lineup that really scares me either.

[philliesfan980]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
samjjones said:
Phillies did not impress me at all this series. They have more holes in their staff than the Mets do. Millwood is not a top of the rotation guy anymore. Outside of Abreu and Thome, there is nobody in the lineup that scares me (OK, Burrell does, but thats only against the Mets). And Bowa is Bobby V. times three.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I don't disagree with your statement. Right now the Mets staff is better than the Phillies staff (Starting staff that is). And I agree that outside of Burrell, Thome, and Abreu, nobody really scares you, but really you can say the same thing about the Mets.

Outside of Piazza , Floyd (sometimes, very streaky), there's nobody else in that lineup that really scares me either.

[philliesfan980]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
samjjones said:
Phillies did not impress me at all this series. They have more holes in their staff than the Mets do. Millwood is not a top of the rotation guy anymore. Outside of Abreu and Thome, there is nobody in the lineup that scares me (OK, Burrell does, but thats only against the Mets). And Bowa is Bobby V. times three.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I don't disagree with your statement. Right now the Mets staff is better than the Phillies staff (Starting staff that is). And I agree that outside of Burrell, Thome, and Abreu, nobody really scares you, but really you can say the same thing about the Mets.

Outside of Piazza , Floyd (sometimes, very streaky), there's nobody else in that lineup that really scares me either.

[HealyMonster]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

hey phillie fan r u in Easton, PA or exton? i never heard of exton. im moving to easton in a few months

[HealyMonster]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

hey phillie fan r u in Easton, PA or exton? i never heard of exton. im moving to easton in a few months

[HealyMonster]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

hey phillie fan r u in Easton, PA or exton? i never heard of exton. im moving to easton in a few months

[TheLetterZ]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Renegade44 said:
hey phillie fan r u in Easton, PA or exton? i never heard of exton. im moving to easton in a few months

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Probably Exton because it says "Exton" and I know it's a real place because I live near there.

[TheLetterZ]

Re: Mets v. Phils and it actually means something.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Renegade44 said:
hey phillie fan r u in Easton, PA or exton? i never heard of exton. im moving to easton in a few months

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Probably Exton because it says "Exton" and I know it's a real place because I live near there.