bonds or ruth

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • primetime
    Rookie
    • Sep 2002
    • 288

    #1

    bonds or ruth

    today we all can see that bonds is one of the best to play baseball breaking tons of records and doing things people have never seen......the babe was one of the best to ever run the bases .......who do you think is better
  • NYJets
    Hall Of Fame
    • Jul 2002
    • 18637

    #2
    Re: bonds or ruth

    Well I never saw Ruth Play , but by what I've heard Bonds doesn't even deserve to pick the dirt out of the Babe's cleats. Bonds is playing when anyone can hit a homerun, it is still unbelievable what hes doing, but Ruth hit more homeruns than whole teams
    Originally posted by Jay Bilas
    The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn

    Comment

    • cookusu
      MVP
      • Jul 2002
      • 1685

      #3
      Re: bonds or ruth

      Yah Ruth was way ahead of his time, but Bonds is right up there. Don't discount what he is doing, it's incredible, his On base % is unreal.

      Comment

      • funky_chicken
        MVP
        • Jul 2002
        • 3282

        #4
        Re: bonds or ruth

        Without a doubt, The Saltan of Swat, Babe Ruth Ruth was htting more homers in one season then whole teams back when he played.

        Comment

        • Heelfan71
          Hall Of Fame
          • Jul 2002
          • 19940

          #5
          Re: bonds or ruth

          I will say Bonds. I think he would have an easier time playing in Ruth's era than Ruth would in todays time. But it is hard to compare players from different eras.

          Has any noticed that Bonds will win the Batting Avg. title this year? Pretty amazing.

          http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/stats/batting?league=9

          MSNBC breaking news and the latest news for today. Get daily news from local news reporters and world news updates with live audio & video from our team.



          My Fan Page http://theusualgamer.net/MyFanPage_Heelfan71.aspx
          Heelfans Blog http://www.operationsports.com/Heelfan71/blog/

          Comment

          • ghm125
            john14:6
            • Jul 2002
            • 2439

            #6
            Re: bonds or ruth

            bonds is the man.....................period
            VIOLATION!!!!!!!!

            Comment

            • ToughTony2K2
              Rookie
              • Aug 2002
              • 14

              #7
              Re: bonds or ruth

              Ruth was hitting 40 homeruns when the average player was hitting below 10. That means Bonds would have to hit like 200 homeruns in one season to do what Ruth did. Like mentioned before, he was way ahead of hit time.

              Comment

              • avh00a
                Pro
                • Aug 2002
                • 761

                #8
                Re: bonds or ruth

                I'll pick Ruth. Bonds is pumped up on roids and playing in an era when homeruns fly out of parks all the time. Ruth's only "supplements" were liquor and hot dogs. He played when the homerun meant something and could also hit for average. I'm not even mentioning the fact that he was a top flight pitcher.

                Besides, comparing different eras is nearly impossible. But, Give me Ruth if i was starting an all-time team, as my #1 pick.

                Comment

                • chippered
                  MVP
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 1528

                  #9
                  Re: bonds or ruth

                  I'd have to say Ruth. Besides, i dont think Bonds would've been able to make it in Ruth's day. Probably would'nt be able to have his own recliner and big sceen tv in the clubhouse either Oh yeah, and the first time Bonds stared down one of his homers, he'd get decked. But of the modern day i'd definetly say Bonds is the best.
                  GT = Chippered

                  Brewers League Baseball
                  Indianapolis Clowns

                  Comment

                  • cookusu
                    MVP
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 1685

                    #10
                    Re: bonds or ruth

                    No disrepect to Ruth, but part of the reason he was so dominate was because of the times. First no minorties, no real minor leagues or scouting system, so players who were great in that era tended to put up numbers, that were far great than there peers because the competitive balance wasn't like it is now.

                    But if we use that as a basis, go check out how much higher Bonds slugging % and on Base % are than anyone else in the league, he is truly dominant in an era you wouldn't expect to see that.

                    As far as being on roids, most of you seem to think all the guys are, so that is not a real advantage for him.

                    Comment

                    • HatTrick
                      Rookie
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 105

                      #11
                      Re: bonds or ruth

                      I'm surprised anyone is even considering Bonds over Ruth. A better argument would be Bonds vs. Mays. Bonds is certainly one of the all-time greats, but he is no Babe Ruth, or even Ted Williams for that matter. No one could do what the Babe did at that time, but Bonds has McGwire, Sosa, A-Rod, and others chasing him.

                      Everyone points to the fact that Bonds will win a batting title this year, but Ruth regularly hit over .350, plus won nearly 100 games as a pitcher. If I had to rank them, it would be Ruth, Williams, then Mays/Bonds/Cobb all bunched together in a close race for third. By the end of his career, Bonds will probably rate a solid third ahead of the other two though.

                      Comment

                      • Heelfan71
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 19940

                        #12
                        Re: bonds or ruth

                        I don't think Ruth would do well in todays game. Just my opinion though.
                        My Fan Page http://theusualgamer.net/MyFanPage_Heelfan71.aspx
                        Heelfans Blog http://www.operationsports.com/Heelfan71/blog/

                        Comment

                        • anklbrkr24
                          Rookie
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 138

                          #13
                          Re: bonds or ruth

                          Heelfan71, I agree

                          Comment

                          • cookusu
                            MVP
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 1685

                            #14
                            Re: bonds or ruth

                            could be tough for him since he is dead.

                            Comment

                            • Heelfan71
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 19940

                              #15
                              Re: bonds or ruth

                              Good point Cook. Being Fat and out of shape won't help much in today's game. Unless you are David Wells.
                              My Fan Page http://theusualgamer.net/MyFanPage_Heelfan71.aspx
                              Heelfans Blog http://www.operationsports.com/Heelfan71/blog/

                              Comment

                              Working...