Shawn Green: Dismisses No Trade Clause

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BatsareBugs
    LVP
    • Feb 2003
    • 12553

    #16
    Re: Shawn Green: Dismisses No Trade Clause

    Originally posted by Tajiri
    Hmm, maybe the D-Backs might finish ahead of the Rockies this year, if they're lucky.
    Rockies = No higher than 3rd place.

    Anywho, even with this move I don't fear the D-Backs now that they've gotten rid of the Padres biggest pitching nemesis. Sure Green will tear up the Padres like Richie Sexson did last year, but I'm not completely sold on that team.

    Comment

    • BatsareBugs
      LVP
      • Feb 2003
      • 12553

      #17
      Re: Shawn Green: Dismisses No Trade Clause

      Originally posted by Tajiri
      Hmm, maybe the D-Backs might finish ahead of the Rockies this year, if they're lucky.
      Rockies = No higher than 3rd place.

      Anywho, even with this move I don't fear the D-Backs now that they've gotten rid of the Padres biggest pitching nemesis. Sure Green will tear up the Padres like Richie Sexson did last year, but I'm not completely sold on that team.

      Comment

      • rsox
        All Star
        • Feb 2003
        • 6309

        #18
        Re: Shawn Green: Dismisses No Trade Clause

        Originally posted by Rag3vsW0rld
        Rockies = No higher than 3rd place.

        Anywho, even with this move I don't fear the D-Backs now that they've gotten rid of the Padres biggest pitching nemesis. Sure Green will tear up the Padres like Richie Sexson did last year, but I'm not completely sold on that team.
        I would be more sold on the Diamondbacks if they had kept Randy Johnson and added another starter to go with him and Russ Ortiz. Without Randy they are a 3rd or 4th place team.

        Comment

        • rsox
          All Star
          • Feb 2003
          • 6309

          #19
          Re: Shawn Green: Dismisses No Trade Clause

          Originally posted by Rag3vsW0rld
          Rockies = No higher than 3rd place.

          Anywho, even with this move I don't fear the D-Backs now that they've gotten rid of the Padres biggest pitching nemesis. Sure Green will tear up the Padres like Richie Sexson did last year, but I'm not completely sold on that team.
          I would be more sold on the Diamondbacks if they had kept Randy Johnson and added another starter to go with him and Russ Ortiz. Without Randy they are a 3rd or 4th place team.

          Comment

          • ChrisHero
            Banned
            • Jul 2003
            • 1109

            #20
            Re: Shawn Green: Dismisses No Trade Clause

            Originally posted by Rag3vsW0rld
            Rockies = No higher than 3rd place.

            Anywho, even with this move I don't fear the D-Backs now that they've gotten rid of the Padres biggest pitching nemesis. Sure Green will tear up the Padres like Richie Sexson did last year, but I'm not completely sold on that team.
            It's a 3 team race, or more like a 2 1/2 team race in the West.

            The Rockies are a joke outside of Coors Field, and the D-Backs just don't have the talent to compete in my opinion. Glaus, Green and Ortiz doesn't make up for the rest of the players on that team.

            Comment

            • ChrisHero
              Banned
              • Jul 2003
              • 1109

              #21
              Re: Shawn Green: Dismisses No Trade Clause

              Originally posted by Rag3vsW0rld
              Rockies = No higher than 3rd place.

              Anywho, even with this move I don't fear the D-Backs now that they've gotten rid of the Padres biggest pitching nemesis. Sure Green will tear up the Padres like Richie Sexson did last year, but I'm not completely sold on that team.
              It's a 3 team race, or more like a 2 1/2 team race in the West.

              The Rockies are a joke outside of Coors Field, and the D-Backs just don't have the talent to compete in my opinion. Glaus, Green and Ortiz doesn't make up for the rest of the players on that team.

              Comment

              Working...