Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

[mazhirui]

They lost 5 games. I know they played in one of the best conferences this year, but they lost 5 games. They didn't even win their own tournament. It was fairly obvious the voters had decided before they waited to see the outcome of the Duke-Maryland game today. I think Miss St. got screwed. I'm not a Miss St. fan, I'm not a fan of any #2 seed, and don't have anything against Duke really, I just think they got in on prestige alone. Because it's Duke.

[jordan0386]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

didnt duke win like 16 in a row

[jordan0386]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

didnt duke win like 16 in a row

[jordan0386]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

didnt duke win like 16 in a row

[3rdAnswer]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jordan0386 said:
didnt duke win like 16 in a row

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> <font color="blue">

Yes they did.

But still, I'm not even sure we deserve the number 1 seed. Oh well. </font>

[3rdAnswer]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jordan0386 said:
didnt duke win like 16 in a row

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> <font color="blue">

Yes they did.

But still, I'm not even sure we deserve the number 1 seed. Oh well. </font>

[3rdAnswer]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jordan0386 said:
didnt duke win like 16 in a row

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post"> <font color="blue">

Yes they did.

But still, I'm not even sure we deserve the number 1 seed. Oh well. </font>

[elicoleman]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
mazhirui said:
They lost 5 games. I know they played in one of the best conferences this year, but they lost 5 games. They didn't even win their own tournament. It was fairly obvious the voters had decided before they waited to see the outcome of the Duke-Maryland game today. I think Miss St. got screwed. I'm not a Miss St. fan, I'm not a fan of any #2 seed, and don't have anything against Duke really, I just think they got in on prestige alone. Because it's Duke.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Mississippi State didnt even win a conference tournament game, so I dont think they deserved it. In fact, Gonzaga deserved it over State. I think Duke got the right seed, and Im a UNC fan. I think the committee did very well(besides Wisky and Pitt maybe, but someone had to miss it, either Pitt or GU) Much better than last year when everything was just downright bad!

[elicoleman]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
mazhirui said:
They lost 5 games. I know they played in one of the best conferences this year, but they lost 5 games. They didn't even win their own tournament. It was fairly obvious the voters had decided before they waited to see the outcome of the Duke-Maryland game today. I think Miss St. got screwed. I'm not a Miss St. fan, I'm not a fan of any #2 seed, and don't have anything against Duke really, I just think they got in on prestige alone. Because it's Duke.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Mississippi State didnt even win a conference tournament game, so I dont think they deserved it. In fact, Gonzaga deserved it over State. I think Duke got the right seed, and Im a UNC fan. I think the committee did very well(besides Wisky and Pitt maybe, but someone had to miss it, either Pitt or GU) Much better than last year when everything was just downright bad!

[elicoleman]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
mazhirui said:
They lost 5 games. I know they played in one of the best conferences this year, but they lost 5 games. They didn't even win their own tournament. It was fairly obvious the voters had decided before they waited to see the outcome of the Duke-Maryland game today. I think Miss St. got screwed. I'm not a Miss St. fan, I'm not a fan of any #2 seed, and don't have anything against Duke really, I just think they got in on prestige alone. Because it's Duke.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Mississippi State didnt even win a conference tournament game, so I dont think they deserved it. In fact, Gonzaga deserved it over State. I think Duke got the right seed, and Im a UNC fan. I think the committee did very well(besides Wisky and Pitt maybe, but someone had to miss it, either Pitt or GU) Much better than last year when everything was just downright bad!

[LiquidCrash]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

If Mississippi State deserved the #1 seed, they should have gotten out of the first round of the SEC tournament. When they lost that game, they blew their chance.

If any team deserved that #1 seed, it was Oklahoma St, who won the Big 12 regular season and tournament titles. They're playing as well as anyone right now. But, their game came late in the day, and the committee said they didn't get to look at the results of it before finishing the seeds.

[LiquidCrash]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

If Mississippi State deserved the #1 seed, they should have gotten out of the first round of the SEC tournament. When they lost that game, they blew their chance.

If any team deserved that #1 seed, it was Oklahoma St, who won the Big 12 regular season and tournament titles. They're playing as well as anyone right now. But, their game came late in the day, and the committee said they didn't get to look at the results of it before finishing the seeds.

[LiquidCrash]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

If Mississippi State deserved the #1 seed, they should have gotten out of the first round of the SEC tournament. When they lost that game, they blew their chance.

If any team deserved that #1 seed, it was Oklahoma St, who won the Big 12 regular season and tournament titles. They're playing as well as anyone right now. But, their game came late in the day, and the committee said they didn't get to look at the results of it before finishing the seeds.

[Programmed2Kill]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

This really can't be disputed because all these #1 seeds could have been exchanged with other teams that got #2 seeds and so on.

Let's face it...there are no more great superpower teams in college basketball like of years before. No dominant big men, except for Okafor, and young talent on the floor too early makes things like this.

[Programmed2Kill]

Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

This really can't be disputed because all these #1 seeds could have been exchanged with other teams that got #2 seeds and so on.

Let's face it...there are no more great superpower teams in college basketball like of years before. No dominant big men, except for Okafor, and young talent on the floor too early makes things like this.