Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Programmed2Kill
    Banned
    • Jul 2002
    • 14644

    #16
    Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

    This really can't be disputed because all these #1 seeds could have been exchanged with other teams that got #2 seeds and so on.

    Let's face it...there are no more great superpower teams in college basketball like of years before. No dominant big men, except for Okafor, and young talent on the floor too early makes things like this.

    Comment

    • Vince
      Bow for Bau
      • Aug 2002
      • 26017

      #17
      Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

      the difference between a number 1 and number 2 is very small.And it doesn't matter if they lost 5 games or not.I believe a MSU team had something like 6 losses a couple of years ago and still got a number 1...
      @ me or dap me

      http://twitter.com/52isthemike

      Comment

      • Vince
        Bow for Bau
        • Aug 2002
        • 26017

        #18
        Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

        the difference between a number 1 and number 2 is very small.And it doesn't matter if they lost 5 games or not.I believe a MSU team had something like 6 losses a couple of years ago and still got a number 1...
        @ me or dap me

        http://twitter.com/52isthemike

        Comment

        • Vince
          Bow for Bau
          • Aug 2002
          • 26017

          #19
          Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

          the difference between a number 1 and number 2 is very small.And it doesn't matter if they lost 5 games or not.I believe a MSU team had something like 6 losses a couple of years ago and still got a number 1...
          @ me or dap me

          http://twitter.com/52isthemike

          Comment

          • PdiddyPop
            K*ngs *f th* D*nc*!
            • Dec 2002
            • 21768

            #20
            Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

            duke got the seed they deserved. they played in the toughest conference and unlike MSU they at least got to the title game. but hell we are in the toughest region quit your whining. im actually though flattered that everyone hates duke cuz if you do that means we get underneath your skin and you just wish you were in our fans and teams shoes. we are the measuring stick of college basketball and i love it.
            President of the Devils Den
            (2009 Pre-Season NIT Champs/2010 ACC Co Reg Season/ACC Tournament/South Regional Champs/National Champs)

            Comment

            • PdiddyPop
              K*ngs *f th* D*nc*!
              • Dec 2002
              • 21768

              #21
              Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

              duke got the seed they deserved. they played in the toughest conference and unlike MSU they at least got to the title game. but hell we are in the toughest region quit your whining. im actually though flattered that everyone hates duke cuz if you do that means we get underneath your skin and you just wish you were in our fans and teams shoes. we are the measuring stick of college basketball and i love it.
              President of the Devils Den
              (2009 Pre-Season NIT Champs/2010 ACC Co Reg Season/ACC Tournament/South Regional Champs/National Champs)

              Comment

              • PdiddyPop
                K*ngs *f th* D*nc*!
                • Dec 2002
                • 21768

                #22
                Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                duke got the seed they deserved. they played in the toughest conference and unlike MSU they at least got to the title game. but hell we are in the toughest region quit your whining. im actually though flattered that everyone hates duke cuz if you do that means we get underneath your skin and you just wish you were in our fans and teams shoes. we are the measuring stick of college basketball and i love it.
                President of the Devils Den
                (2009 Pre-Season NIT Champs/2010 ACC Co Reg Season/ACC Tournament/South Regional Champs/National Champs)

                Comment

                • bdunn13
                  GATA
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 4499

                  #23
                  Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                  I am one of those that still believes MSU deserved to get it over Duke.
                  Rent this space.

                  Comment

                  • bdunn13
                    GATA
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 4499

                    #24
                    Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                    I am one of those that still believes MSU deserved to get it over Duke.
                    Rent this space.

                    Comment

                    • bdunn13
                      GATA
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 4499

                      #25
                      Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                      I am one of those that still believes MSU deserved to get it over Duke.
                      Rent this space.

                      Comment

                      • CheckMate
                        All Star
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 4133

                        #26
                        Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Programmed2Kill said:
                        This really can't be disputed because all these #1 seeds could have been exchanged with other teams that got #2 seeds and so on.

                        Let's face it...there are no more great superpower teams in college basketball like of years before. No dominant big men, except for Okafor, and young talent on the floor too early makes things like this.

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        The difference in a 1 or 2 seed isn't really about those two teams. It has more to do with the 3,4,8,9 matchups.

                        Personally, If I'm Miss. St. I'd rather face Xavier/Louisville right now than Arizona/Seton Hall.
                        "If y’all see me in the news, and I make the news for something that I ain’t got no business making it for, don’t bash me. Say it was a young guy living."
                        - Clinton Portis

                        Comment

                        • CheckMate
                          All Star
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 4133

                          #27
                          Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          Programmed2Kill said:
                          This really can't be disputed because all these #1 seeds could have been exchanged with other teams that got #2 seeds and so on.

                          Let's face it...there are no more great superpower teams in college basketball like of years before. No dominant big men, except for Okafor, and young talent on the floor too early makes things like this.

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          The difference in a 1 or 2 seed isn't really about those two teams. It has more to do with the 3,4,8,9 matchups.

                          Personally, If I'm Miss. St. I'd rather face Xavier/Louisville right now than Arizona/Seton Hall.
                          "If y’all see me in the news, and I make the news for something that I ain’t got no business making it for, don’t bash me. Say it was a young guy living."
                          - Clinton Portis

                          Comment

                          • CheckMate
                            All Star
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 4133

                            #28
                            Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            Programmed2Kill said:
                            This really can't be disputed because all these #1 seeds could have been exchanged with other teams that got #2 seeds and so on.

                            Let's face it...there are no more great superpower teams in college basketball like of years before. No dominant big men, except for Okafor, and young talent on the floor too early makes things like this.

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            The difference in a 1 or 2 seed isn't really about those two teams. It has more to do with the 3,4,8,9 matchups.

                            Personally, If I'm Miss. St. I'd rather face Xavier/Louisville right now than Arizona/Seton Hall.
                            "If y’all see me in the news, and I make the news for something that I ain’t got no business making it for, don’t bash me. Say it was a young guy living."
                            - Clinton Portis

                            Comment

                            • fsquid
                              Banned
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 17635

                              #29
                              Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                              a bunch of these seeds baffle me this year. However, with the parity that we are seeing this year, you can make a case either way. I would have to think that the committee had a tough time seeding this field.

                              Comment

                              • fsquid
                                Banned
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 17635

                                #30
                                Re: Duke does not deserve a #1 seed

                                a bunch of these seeds baffle me this year. However, with the parity that we are seeing this year, you can make a case either way. I would have to think that the committee had a tough time seeding this field.

                                Comment

                                Working...