You watch the NBA but do you keep a track of the stats? We'll simply say Curry is one of the best shooters in the league; I've included a chart. I personally would like to replicate the actual NBA experience. To clarify, I'm saying that I love that I can get sort of the same feeling playing 2k as watching the NBA. I love that I miss wide open shots and love that I can make contested shots because that's how it is in the real NBA. I actually hate it when I'm making all my wide open shots on Hall of Fame. If I'm seeing 3/3 or 5/5 on three points shots during the first quarter or first half even with Curry, it just doesn't feel "right."
Wide-open 3s and ranking how each NBA team fared at making defenses pay
Team as a whole (2016 Season), the Warriors were #1 (43.7%); Memphis was #30 (34%). Not even Curry's open shots were guaranteed (2017-2018 season graphic below).
Warriors: #1 (2016 Season)
43.7 percent on wide-open 3-pointers, 39.4 percent of their 3-point attempts
Blazers: #7 (2016 Season)
40.1 percent on wide-open 3-pointers, 39.7 percent of their 3-point attempts
Memphis: #30 (2016 Season)
34 percent on wide-open 3-pointers, 42.1 percent of their 3-point attempts
https://stats.nba.com/player/201939/shots-dash/

You can hit plenty of bad shots versus the computer on Hall of Fame -- I've tasted HOF once during NBA 2k16 and never looked back. I personally just play the game with real teams and real players, don't even care about badges. I use random teams as well; I don't even care to study who's a three point threat and who specializes in what; I figure that out as I go along. HOF default slider 12 minutes.
From my understanding (i.e. reading threads on this forum, it's always, always the other way around where the online crowd or twitter/youtube complainers that pushes for patches to the game that meets their "norm" (i.e. the need to make "all" their wide open shots, the need to make all their layups, etc. etc. etc.)

Comment