-
Originally posted by Fabian Avenarius Lloyd -
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
:wink:
If I can't give it my full effort, then I'm just half-assing it. I can't do that.
All it really requires is patience, time, these websites:
http://www.hoopdata.com
http://www.82games.com
http://www.basketballvalue.com
http://www.nba.com
and enjoyment of video games.
I have all of these, except the last one.
That said, you never know.Originally posted by Fabian Avenarius LloydComment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
tried the new sliders. damn, too many TO's and fouls for me.Comment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
End of the first Game for me.
Again with some modification for sst.
11 minutes (with sst 12 minutes give too much point at final)
Off. Awarness to 88 (2.3 set)
Clutch Factor OFF
Clutch Sliders to 3 (2.3 too if I remember)
Inside Shot Success: 46 ( pre post set)
Close Shot Success: 47
Mid-Range Success: 47
3PT Success: 50
All The rest with 2.6 set.
So
Think I've found good balance for adapt the set even is there always some inconsistencies.Comment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
Win my second game, but there's weird stats
^^
Comment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
sorry gree but all-star is completly insane for me, too many silly TO and high shooting %, unplayable for my taste
Comment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
2.7, page 1.Originally posted by Fabian Avenarius LloydComment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
End of the first Game for me.
Again with some modification for sst.
11 minutes (with sst 12 minutes give too much point at final)
Off. Awarness to 88 (2.3 set)
Clutch Factor OFF
Clutch Sliders to 3 (2.3 too if I remember)
Inside Shot Success: 46 ( pre post set)
Close Shot Success: 47
Mid-Range Success: 47
3PT Success: 50
All The rest with 2.6 set.
So
Think I've found good balance for adapt the set even is there always some inconsistencies.
Sounds, looks good to me, Mourf.
Nice work.Originally posted by Fabian Avenarius LloydComment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
You hit a wall when you realize that the computer is actually passing to open men on AS for great shots, and single-mindedly running stupid ISO's and pulling up for horrible shots all game long on PRO. The court vision on AS is phenomenal. The court vision on PRO is nonexistent (even with OFF AWR @ 100).
Is it in the settings? Perhaps. But, I can't kill the defense on PRO anymore than I already have and have it be competitive (realistic). There isn't an ounce of cheating on AS, that's just the computer kicking the **** out of you when you **** up. It's basketball and a lot of has to do with how well you handle each possession, if shots fall, refs calls, etc. One mistake becomes two, becomes three, becomes a blowout. You can do whatever you want on PRO and still be in the game (and usually win), AS is not like this.
People complain about TO's, but what they fail to realize is there are ways to avoid TO's at the current settings.
One: you can't pass through people, thus hands are high.
Two: if you put the ball in the hand nearest the pass recipient, the odds are much greater that you will complete it.
Three: if you move away from traffic when you are inbounding the ball, the odds are much greater that you will not throw it away.
Four: if you are throwing a cross court pass, you should make sure you are not throwing it over the head of two defenders standing in the lane. +
Five: put the settings on default and see how wonky the passing system is already.
Six: I didn't design the game.
Seven: It's two ****ing sliders.
Eight: You might have to let the computer inbound the ball, if you don't want to cheat.
There is literally no way that PASS ACC @ 45+, hands under 77 will cause the computer to turn the ball over more than 10 times a game. That's not realistic. It's phony. You can adjust HUM, CPU independently and tune to your preference. I've posted my preference and reasoned why a million times. But, sorry, I'm not David Koresh, solve your own problems (or whatever you perceive are your problems). Besides, MLB: TC is released in two months, that'll take care of 99.9% of you.
Not that that was what you were talking about.
Sorry to lose you, man. Good luck!Last edited by greenieblue; 01-06-2011, 02:33 PM.Originally posted by Fabian Avenarius LloydComment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
NBA teams turn the ball over on average 14 times per game. Is that what the CPU is getting on All-Star?There is literally no way that PASS ACC @ 45+, hands under 77 will cause the computer to turn the ball over more than 10 times a game. That's not realistic. It's phony.Comment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
Thx dude ! I tell myself that I've put my life in game when I show you my modification for other thing that FG% shoot ...
There's something else I wanna know :
On the pre patch set, I was very very impressed by way that the cpu react and his reaction on the court. (and I discovers your set AFTER the patch so.. )
If he was free for a 3pts shot, He take it, if not, he search another way to play (in my "souvenirs" in french). But in this set (and maybe cause it's in All Star Level) he's got weird reaction, shot at 3 with three players around, Attack the basket really (too?) often etc... just weird sometimes.
What can it change if we take the old tendencies for put them in the 2.7 version of Post patch, is there's a relation beetween the tendencies and the % of FG for exemple...is that a risk to completly ****ed up the entier set ?
this question is clear in my head , but a little bit confused when I try to ask and explain here, sorryComment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
They actually avg. from 17.3 (MIN) - 13.3 (UTA).
The answer is, I don't know. But, that's the goal.
What goes into an AVG of 17? Just this:
29:
25:
21:
20:
19:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2011010116
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2010122916
18:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2010122916
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2010112416
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2010110319
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2010110214
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2010102916
That is: 36% of their games, they have turned the ball over more than their own AVG.
Not to mention the NBA AVG.
TO's are incredibly important. One of the most important stats in the NBA. I said it before, I'll say it again, I don't care how I get there, as long as I do.
I feel the same about O-boards. Unfortunately there is no band aid.Last edited by greenieblue; 01-06-2011, 03:43 PM.Originally posted by Fabian Avenarius LloydComment
-
Re: The Purist(s) NBA 2K11 Sliders (Post-Patch)
Thx dude ! I tell myself that I've put my life in game when I show you my modification for other thing that FG% shoot ...
There's something else I wanna know :
On the pre patch set, I was very very impressed by way that the cpu react and his reaction on the court. (and I discovers your set AFTER the patch so.. )
If he was free for a 3pts shot, He take it, if not, he search another way to play (in my "souvenirs" in french). But in this set (and maybe cause it's in All Star Level) he's got weird reaction, shot at 3 with three players around, Attack the basket really (too?) often etc... just weird sometimes.
What can it change if we take the old tendencies for put them in the 2.7 version of Post patch, is there's a relation beetween the tendencies and the % of FG for exemple...is that a risk to completly ****ed up the entier set ?
this question is clear in my head , but a little bit confused when I try to ask and explain here, sorry
My experience was the exact opposite. Stupid shots on Pro, & with OFF AWR +68 on AS, nice shot selection.
Some of it is in the players tendencies (the horrible fade-aways, for instance).
I understand your question, but I don't know the answer. Sorry, man.Originally posted by Fabian Avenarius LloydComment
Comment