MyTeam Mobile Discussion

**wodkalol** · 07-02-2015, 02:33 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

and they keep the cash crab rttc structure from the warriors rttc without the better cards

**StrikerAI** · 07-02-2015, 02:38 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Originally posted by wodkalol

and they keep the cash crab rttc structure from the warriors rttc without the better cards

To help people get loyalty cards, so its not a bad thing.

**Dextro** · 07-02-2015, 02:38 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Yes - I actually like the old structure more. The new one is only inflating the number of PO Cards nobody wants.

Those new cards are the equivalent to Nick Young and Henry Bibby

Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

**Khanster** · 07-02-2015, 02:40 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Originally posted by A.K.A Thomas

As much as I like a forumseason or be joined by/joining another member, I wanna win(such a competitor). So you guys gotta step your game up lol.

I think that;
"Im not gonna be able to do it". Sigh, sorry guys.

_______________________________
MVP: Epic Wesley Matthews
IGN: Thomas
Gesendet mit Tapatalk
Dont do Chalkboards

Idc, I'll still do one with you

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**Tank4ever** · 07-02-2015, 02:40 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Originally posted by Dextro

Yes - I actually like the old structure more. The new one is only inflating the number of PO Cards nobody wants.

Those new cards are the equivalent to Nick Young and Henry Bibby

Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

Doesn't matter if you want them or not. You need them if you want any chance at loyalty rewards

**MWIL** · 07-02-2015, 02:43 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

While you're all talking check out my competition
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2047457154

**Mas009** · 07-02-2015, 02:46 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Thought I would summarise up some of the key points from a Q&A with NWGameDad on Facebook:

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>ZH-CN</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>AR-SA</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/> <w

ontFlipMirrorIndents/> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/> <w:UseFELayout/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>ZH-CN</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>AR-SA</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/> <w

ontFlipMirrorIndents/> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/> <w:UseFELayout/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> · Danan Davis The RttC difficulty is the same as the last RttC event. It starts with an UR deck. That should be low enough for most decks to acquire at least one PO card. The Boss decks will be different than the last ones though so not the exact same decks.
· Danan Davis Jimmy - I disagree that PO Pros are harder to get than Greats. With the AH and the amount of trading that goes on it will be much easier to Pro cards than buy a Greats.
· Danan Davis Ryan - A sellback feature, or what I call "vendoring" a card, is in MyNBA2k16.
· Danan Davis The AH minimums are not planned to change. For '16 we have a whole new economy and are applying lessons learned from '15 to it. For '15 though we don't plan to change the values. Now that may change over the next 2 months as we look at data post announcement.
· Danan Davis The Season rewards are not changing.
· Danan Davis The Greats are the final tier of cards. The only cards we just "released" that are equal are the MJ Greats card and the PO RC loser cards being available now.
· Danan Davis The SuperCard Fusion system is not coming to '15. For now it is not a part of the '16 plans either.
· Danan Davis Kevin - No, there will be one Greats. The rewards will be like the Warriors/Cavs event we ran. That does mean your best opportunity for PO cards will be in RttC. RC will still be a relatively easy opportunity at points though.
· Danan Davis Donald - Incorrrect Pros still count as a Pro, so 3 points for them.
· Danan Davis Dave - We will probably not announce the specific rewards until August after we have playtested, and we can reveal more details of '16 to give context of the rewards. Without context the rewards will not mean much.
· Danan Davis - I can't remember if we have a Heat RttC. The theme for the remaining RttCs are iconic Finals up for each decade from 1960s - 2000s. For RC the theme is What If, pitting the two Conference Finals losers in a What If match if they had won and met up. Those will run 2010-2014.
· Danan Davis Robert - The highest enhancement for '15 is Epic and will remain so. For '16 we are expanding the Enhancements quite a bit.
· Danan Davis - The Greats will not be auctionable.
· Danan Davis Lucas - I think the next RC has Russell in it only. We will not have a dupe opportunity for Pippen at the top end.
· Danan Davis Justin - For '15 no, for '16 well you'll just have to wait and see. A new game mode is very important to me.
· Danan Davis RE: '16 economy - I can't answer specifics yet. I will say we will continue to drop cards to players so they feel appropriately rewarded. The supply on the AH will be less though hopefully creating a more vibrant economy there.
· Danan Davis RC cards are considered regular PO cards right now because of some tech difficulties. If we can fix those then we will count RC cards as Greats.
· Danan Davis David - The PO cards from RttCs will be available from the board, Seasons, and auctionable. The 2015 Champs were a special deal to celebrate the Warrior's historic win, so they were not acquirable outside of the event.
· Danan Davis Christian - YEs,since '16 is a new app you will get a chance to enter a new name. You will need to login with the same login (Facebook acct, Game Center, Google+,etc.) to get the Loyalty Rewards. You can have a new in game name though, which will be important as our social features are expanding!
· Danan Davis - Pippen is not available in next week's RC. I don't remember if he is the Great for the 90's RttC. I don't think he is.,
· Danan Davis - Vendoring cards will not be a feature in '15. It will make it's debut in '16.
· Danan Davis Bruno - The cards stats are getting a lot of attention. While we improved from '14 to '15, we still don't have the stats right. It is one of the reasons we are going back to 4 stats this year, to make it easier to balance. The 5 stats thing just did...See More
· Danan Davis - We are making some pretty big changes to the economy. I can't talk about them yet, but I will probably start discussing it in detail in August. Addressing the AH complaints, and card supply are high on the list of things to fix. Honestly, I'm not sure you'll all be happy with the AH changes at first, but in the long run I think it will set it up to be a better feature.
· Danan Davis One of the things unlikely to change is the AH times. Anything less than 12 hours and BIN becomes meaningless.
· Danan Davis Billy - We are absolutely looking to banish the single card packs. I am in total agreement that it doesn't feel right opening a pack and getting a single card. More on this later as it is tied to some hefty card changes in '16.
· Danan Davis Andrew - I'll see what I can do with AI in the future. He's tough since he never won a championship, but he was awesome. Players like that are difficult to get the love they deserve when we have so many things tied design wise to winning Championships.
· Danan Davis Irving - I don't have the card list with me, so I can't say for sure, but I don't think so. The Hornets are a tough team to feature. Their history is not that long, and they are a small market team, which means they get destroyed by anyone in RC.
· Danan Davis Matthew - For MJ, I just haven't decided yet. For '14 he was too easy to get. For '15 I liked him on the ladder, but the ladder was a bust outside of 1000 games since the balance was so off. For '16, we have MJ and another superstar we can use as sp...See More
· Danan Davis Peter - The stats are a special challenge each year to whittle the mega spreadsheet from the console team down in to 4 meager stats for the cards. I've been working with the stats guy pretty closely to try and get it right this year.
· Danan Davis - OKC has a RC event if I remember right. Sorry, I just don't remember off the top of my head. We laid down the next 10 events in prep for the Loyalty Program, but I am pretty sure OKC is one of those Conference Finals losers that hits in the What If RC series.
· Danan Davis Mas - I just don't know about the SGs in the coming RttCs. Like I said, we laid out all the events and I just don't remember. I will say position is almost never a consideration when laying out the rewards. We have just too many other variables to consider that are more important. IF you want an SG you can always go get the GOAT from our new pack. wink emoticon
· Danan Davis Mas - Training basically remains the same. There are two major exceptions, but again I can't talk about those yet.
· Danan Davis Jimmy - The card design is in progress,but our artists are knocking it out of the park, imho.
· Danan Davis Georgia - We probably will not start with events at launch again. As for Loyalty Rewards, we are still working them out, but they most definitely will not be the same for everyone. Randomness will be involved to some degree in order to prevent everyone playing the same decks for the first few weeks of the game. I get it, you all hate Boris Diaw. tongue emoticon
· Danan Davis Mas - I don't think there is a Houston RttC again. Again, no spreadsheet in front of me, so no complaining if I am wrong.
· Danan Davis Jimmy - That is hard to say. Generally we aim for a Quick Game to take 30-40 seconds to complete. Animations will fit in that range.
· Danan Davis Mas - Last one. Credits sales are not possible. The way skus are fixed in the Apple store it is a tremendous problem to have sale on actual Credits. Notice that no other games have them. As for Pack Sales, we will continue to have Pack Sales. Stay tuned for another announcement later this week.
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>ZH-CN</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>AR-SA</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/> <w

ontFlipMirrorIndents/> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/> <w:UseFELayout/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->

**Mas009** · 07-02-2015, 02:47 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Sorry couldn't be bothered fixing (formatting) it anymore than that.

**jasrulz63** · 07-02-2015, 02:48 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Originally posted by wodkalol

and they keep the cash crab rttc structure from the warriors rttc without the better cards

Under the old structure, you needed over 500 points (can't remember the exact figures) to get a PO card, as well as needing to beat the PO deck (or lose lots of games). Now it's 224 and you only need to beat an UR to get one. How is that worse in terms of being a cash grab? They'd get more credits from you going through common through to PO before they reward you with a PO card.

I do agree with it being bad in terms of diluting the PO pool.

**MWIL** · 07-02-2015, 02:56 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

" IF you want an SG you can always go get the GOAT from our new pack. wink emoticon " HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

**Mas009** · 07-02-2015, 02:56 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Originally posted by MWIL

" IF you want an SG you can always go get the GOAT from our new pack. wink emoticon " HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I tried, I have all the other ones as singles

**jasrulz63** · 07-02-2015, 02:59 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Less supply on the AH. Wonder how they will achieve that? Lower drop rates? Harder to obtain cards in events?

This part has me worried "Honestly, I'm not sure you'll all be happy with the AH changes at first, but in the long run I think it will set it up to be a better feature."

Maybe higher listing fees to limit the amount that go onto the AH?

**sraven** · 07-02-2015, 03:14 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Goooooood morning guys

**jasrulz63** · 07-02-2015, 03:18 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Originally posted by sraven

Goooooood morning guys

Good evening

**ColtsAJD** · 07-02-2015, 03:18 AM

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Originally posted by LAKERKING

*1st time he buys ATH enhancement when he wanted DEF* - mistake

*2nd time he buys ATH enhancement when he wanted DEF* - Understandable but he could've looked better

*3rd time he buys ATH enhancement when he wanted DEF* - OK, what were you looking at?!

Lol, sorry Yiy but were you doing when you bought them?

I was gonna buy a defensive enhancement, but then I got high...

MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment