no doubt Graphik I fixed what i said cause i did mean it that way anyway with saying more. Your right I didnt want to say that way. Anyway what game are going to get Graphik just courius.
I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
no doubt Graphik I fixed what i said cause i did mean it that way anyway with saying more. Your right I didnt want to say that way. Anyway what game are going to get Graphik just courius.N.Y Mets
N.Y Giants
N.Y Knicks
N.Y Islanders
Miami Hurricanes
Twitter - @RoyalBoyle78
XBOX LIVE - Royalboyle78
PSN - RoyalBoyle78 -
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
Well I'm getting both. I'm more excited about Live since its dynasty/franchise looks promising. ESPN has'nt even hyped me up for the game yet. I'm gonna get it anyway. I was a 2K player last year, and Live 2003, I sold it within a week of getting it.
And if you're gonna fix up your original post, at least say which one you think is better. It still seems confusing upon reading it. Well not confusing until you scroll down and see your other post.http://neverfollow.biz (Independent Music Group)Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
Well I'm getting both. I'm more excited about Live since its dynasty/franchise looks promising. ESPN has'nt even hyped me up for the game yet. I'm gonna get it anyway. I was a 2K player last year, and Live 2003, I sold it within a week of getting it.
And if you're gonna fix up your original post, at least say which one you think is better. It still seems confusing upon reading it. Well not confusing until you scroll down and see your other post.http://neverfollow.biz (Independent Music Group)Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
Well I'm getting both. I'm more excited about Live since its dynasty/franchise looks promising. ESPN has'nt even hyped me up for the game yet. I'm gonna get it anyway. I was a 2K player last year, and Live 2003, I sold it within a week of getting it.
And if you're gonna fix up your original post, at least say which one you think is better. It still seems confusing upon reading it. Well not confusing until you scroll down and see your other post.http://neverfollow.biz (Independent Music Group)Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
I like the body textures in the espn basketball but live has the better body models.Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
I like the body textures in the espn basketball but live has the better body models.Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
I like the body textures in the espn basketball but live has the better body models.Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
Now for all saying that graphics dont count. Would you buy a game today that looks like Double Dribble but yet play like NBA Live? If you say yes, give me a good reason besides the gameplay is all that matters excuse. Because I can counter that one easily.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
yeah but wouldnt you rather play a game that looked like DD and played like Live than a game that looked like ESPN and played like DD? imo, gameplay > graphics.Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
Now for all saying that graphics dont count. Would you buy a game today that looks like Double Dribble but yet play like NBA Live? If you say yes, give me a good reason besides the gameplay is all that matters excuse. Because I can counter that one easily.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
yeah but wouldnt you rather play a game that looked like DD and played like Live than a game that looked like ESPN and played like DD? imo, gameplay > graphics.Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
Now for all saying that graphics dont count. Would you buy a game today that looks like Double Dribble but yet play like NBA Live? If you say yes, give me a good reason besides the gameplay is all that matters excuse. Because I can counter that one easily.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
yeah but wouldnt you rather play a game that looked like DD and played like Live than a game that looked like ESPN and played like DD? imo, gameplay > graphics.Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
trung said:
Now for all saying that graphics dont count. Would you buy a game today that looks like Double Dribble but yet play like NBA Live? If you say yes, give me a good reason besides the gameplay is all that matters excuse. Because I can counter that one easily.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
yeah but wouldnt you rather play a game that looked like DD and played like Live than a game that looked like ESPN and played like DD? imo, gameplay > graphics.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I dont get it. Ok I got it. You're saying if the graphics were gods gift to man but played a crappy game. Oh ok. Thats a good one. Kinda has me off guard. I really dont know how to answer.
I would pick the DD that played Like Live but thats where my example comes in using HH. I even took HH back because the graphics were trash compared to todays standards. And I stuck with another baseball game despite it not playing as well. Close, but not as perfect as HHs gameplay. And to be honest, I wish I did'nt trade HH in, I'd probably still be playing it.
So it is no real easy way to answer it besides saying,the graphics lured me in therefore graphics took a major role in my purchase. Which was the point I was tryna make at first.
Using HH as an example, alot of ppl returned the DD that played like Live in return for a DD that looked like ESPN. So them saying graphics are not important are contradicting themselves by buying a game with lesser gameplay with great graphics instead of the ugly game with great gameplay.
And if you have a hard time understanding what I said, dont sweat it, I can hardly understand it myself.http://neverfollow.biz (Independent Music Group)Comment
-
Re: I dont think the graphics are bad at all !!!!!!
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
trung said:
Now for all saying that graphics dont count. Would you buy a game today that looks like Double Dribble but yet play like NBA Live? If you say yes, give me a good reason besides the gameplay is all that matters excuse. Because I can counter that one easily.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
yeah but wouldnt you rather play a game that looked like DD and played like Live than a game that looked like ESPN and played like DD? imo, gameplay > graphics.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
I dont get it. Ok I got it. You're saying if the graphics were gods gift to man but played a crappy game. Oh ok. Thats a good one. Kinda has me off guard. I really dont know how to answer.
I would pick the DD that played Like Live but thats where my example comes in using HH. I even took HH back because the graphics were trash compared to todays standards. And I stuck with another baseball game despite it not playing as well. Close, but not as perfect as HHs gameplay. And to be honest, I wish I did'nt trade HH in, I'd probably still be playing it.
So it is no real easy way to answer it besides saying,the graphics lured me in therefore graphics took a major role in my purchase. Which was the point I was tryna make at first.
Using HH as an example, alot of ppl returned the DD that played like Live in return for a DD that looked like ESPN. So them saying graphics are not important are contradicting themselves by buying a game with lesser gameplay with great graphics instead of the ugly game with great gameplay.
And if you have a hard time understanding what I said, dont sweat it, I can hardly understand it myself.http://neverfollow.biz (Independent Music Group)Comment
Comment