LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

[2kfanatic]

Re: LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

Live always make good cyber faces except for ginobili and turkoglu in 2006. The only complain I have about the graphics is the shiny effect I guess.

[Boilerbuzz]

Re: LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

What I liked about the player face models from what I saw were the facial parts were proportional (except for Lebron Jame's bottom lip lol). This is something 2k never gets right. Their cyberfaces can look like a player to a certain extent, but their facial parts are either too big or too small. Such details take away from the accuracy of the depiction of the face.

Didn't take long...

[chandlerbang]

Re: LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

What I liked about the player face models from what I saw were the facial parts were proportional (except for Lebron Jame's bottom lip lol). This is something 2k never gets right. Their cyberfaces can look like a player to a certain extent, but their facial parts are either too big or too small. Such details take away from the accuracy of the depiction of the face.

but i am not looking at how wide a guys nose is when playing the game. 100 hour should have went to using a new way of motion capturing player movements because this robotic look they are potraying year after year is getting redundant

[Muzyk23]

Re: LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

What I liked about the player face models from what I saw were the facial parts were proportional (except for Lebron Jame's bottom lip lol). This is something 2k never gets right. Their cyberfaces can look like a player to a certain extent, but their facial parts are either too big or too small. Such details take away from the accuracy of the depiction of the face.

and you did get all that from a crappy quality ps2 vid ? I don't believe you

this is a Live forum, yet you typed just one sentence about Live and three about 2k.. I don't believe you

[MostlyChilly]

Re: LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

Less time on faces, more time on gameplay and physics.

Rocket science.png

[Gman 18]

Re: LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

That's not true. Presentation is great. I think Presentation is the best thing about this game. Graphics still are off to me, but I don't care about any of that until the gameplay/physics/mechanics are fixed. Foundation people.

Thats what i meant. I meant that the graphics of the players models and presentation are the only things that were good about this game

[TUSS11]

Re: LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

Less time on faces, more time on gameplay and physics.

[ATTACH]49296[/ATTACH]

Yes, because the gameplay producers and programmers were spending all their time tweaking Andre Miller's goatee...

[MielVB]

Re: LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

They didn't put graphics before gameplay. If you didn't know by now, gameplay and art are two entirely different departments with entirely different staff. The reason why they mentioned putting 100 hours into faces was because they didn't have much to show gameplay wise, not because they were neglecting gameplay altogether.

I get your point. But the money for the manhours could have been spent differently, all I'm saying.