Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

[CM1847]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

Zack Randolph scored 50 points against me. Are you setting up the double team on thes guys in your matchups screen? That may be the issue, because the AI may be reluctant to go to them if they are double teamed.

I will look at that next time i play a game, thanks.

[CM1847]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

Zack Randolph scored 50 points against me. Are you setting up the double team on thes guys in your matchups screen? That may be the issue, because the AI may be reluctant to go to them if they are double teamed.

I will look at that next time i play a game, thanks.

[jpup]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

Zack Randolph scored 50 points against me. Are you setting up the double team on thes guys in your matchups screen? That may be the issue, because the AI may be reluctant to go to them if they are double teamed.

50 points? now that would be something to see.

[jpup]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

Zack Randolph scored 50 points against me. Are you setting up the double team on thes guys in your matchups screen? That may be the issue, because the AI may be reluctant to go to them if they are double teamed.

50 points? now that would be something to see.

[CM1847]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

Finally had some promising results. Played against Houston and Yao scored 27 on me to lead the Rockets(only TMac took more shots). I changed the double team to off for all players and I went and changed Houston's Offensive Strategy to Stagger. I play them again next week, I will try both of those agian, hopefully get some more good results.

[CM1847]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

Finally had some promising results. Played against Houston and Yao scored 27 on me to lead the Rockets(only TMac took more shots). I changed the double team to off for all players and I went and changed Houston's Offensive Strategy to Stagger. I play them again next week, I will try both of those agian, hopefully get some more good results.

[Court_vision]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

[QUOTE=CM1847]Another game, same frustration....

Played Minnesota, expecting Garnett to dominate....

While he did have 20 points, THREE other players had more shots than him. Cassell took 14 shots, scoring 14 points, Sprewell took 16 scoring 16 and Wally took 30 shots scoring 22.

QUOTE]

You DO realise Spree and Sammy OFTEN take more shot's than KG, right????

In the real NBA.

In this game...for those of you who want Duncan and KG getting the ball all the time, it's pretty simple...just edit their PRIMACY ratings up to 99.

Simple.

[Court_vision]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

[QUOTE=CM1847]Another game, same frustration....

Played Minnesota, expecting Garnett to dominate....

While he did have 20 points, THREE other players had more shots than him. Cassell took 14 shots, scoring 14 points, Sprewell took 16 scoring 16 and Wally took 30 shots scoring 22.

QUOTE]

You DO realise Spree and Sammy OFTEN take more shot's than KG, right????

In the real NBA.

In this game...for those of you who want Duncan and KG getting the ball all the time, it's pretty simple...just edit their PRIMACY ratings up to 99.

Simple.

[CM1847]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

You DO realise Spree and Sammy OFTEN take more shot's than KG, right????

In the real NBA.

In this game...for those of you who want Duncan and KG getting the ball all the time, it's pretty simple...just edit their PRIMACY ratings up to 99.

Simple.

Every few games Sprewell OR Cassell will take more shots than KG. On AVERAGE KG shoots 5 more shots per game than either of them and I don't have the stats, but I'm willing to be there wasn't a single game that KG played in last year which three other Wolves shot the ball more than him.

As for Primacy, i looked into that and Duncan's is over 20 points higher than Parker or Ginobili(and Parker is a PG, their's is always a little bit higher). KG's is also 15-20 higher than Cassell, Spree or Wally(Wally's is like 40 or something like that). When a guy's primacy is far and away higher than anyone else's on the team, I doubt raising them a little bit will be productive. Especially if their Primacy rating comes into play in FA signing, I don't want TD or KG being FAs because they didn't get the ball every possesion and won't re-sign with their Primacy's at 99.

[CM1847]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

You DO realise Spree and Sammy OFTEN take more shot's than KG, right????

In the real NBA.

In this game...for those of you who want Duncan and KG getting the ball all the time, it's pretty simple...just edit their PRIMACY ratings up to 99.

Simple.

Every few games Sprewell OR Cassell will take more shots than KG. On AVERAGE KG shoots 5 more shots per game than either of them and I don't have the stats, but I'm willing to be there wasn't a single game that KG played in last year which three other Wolves shot the ball more than him.

As for Primacy, i looked into that and Duncan's is over 20 points higher than Parker or Ginobili(and Parker is a PG, their's is always a little bit higher). KG's is also 15-20 higher than Cassell, Spree or Wally(Wally's is like 40 or something like that). When a guy's primacy is far and away higher than anyone else's on the team, I doubt raising them a little bit will be productive. Especially if their Primacy rating comes into play in FA signing, I don't want TD or KG being FAs because they didn't get the ball every possesion and won't re-sign with their Primacy's at 99.

[Alliball]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

50 points? now that would be something to see.

Trust me, it wasn't fun. I did raise his FG up to around 70, because I felt a guy that scores almost 20 ppg at around 50% FG should have a FG rating higher than his 55 or so that he had.

[Alliball]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

50 points? now that would be something to see.

Trust me, it wasn't fun. I did raise his FG up to around 70, because I felt a guy that scores almost 20 ppg at around 50% FG should have a FG rating higher than his 55 or so that he had.

[JohnnyWoodcock]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

whenever i play houston, yao always has a good quarter to quarter-and-a-half where he dominates, basically scoring at will. other than that, he plays so-so, but he always finishes with a good number of points.

i think this is supposed to replicate a guy just going off and being unstoppable for a while. it's rare that someone does this all game, even duncan and KG. duncan only scored 22.3 ppg last year.

[JohnnyWoodcock]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

whenever i play houston, yao always has a good quarter to quarter-and-a-half where he dominates, basically scoring at will. other than that, he plays so-so, but he always finishes with a good number of points.

i think this is supposed to replicate a guy just going off and being unstoppable for a while. it's rare that someone does this all game, even duncan and KG. duncan only scored 22.3 ppg last year.

[CM1847]

Re: Curious CPU BIg Men AI....

whenever i play houston, yao always has a good quarter to quarter-and-a-half where he dominates, basically scoring at will. other than that, he plays so-so, but he always finishes with a good number of points.

i think this is supposed to replicate a guy just going off and being unstoppable for a while. it's rare that someone does this all game, even duncan and KG. duncan only scored 22.3 ppg last year.

I think you might be right. I am seeing a lot of this as well. The only problem is that when it's not during that stretch of domination, they completely dissappear. I like seeing someone catch fire and getting 10-15 points in one quarter, it just annoys me when you can't even tell that player is on the floor the rest of the game.

NCAA Football 2005 had this a lot too. I would blow out teams in the first half and they would catch fire in the second half and the final score would end up reasonable. Looking at final scores and stats for that and for the big men here you really can't complain too much, it's just odd how they end up with those stats.