User vs. Cpu shot control......

**Graphik** · 10-14-2004, 09:28 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

Just the timing. Once you master it, you can hit the majority of your shots. They also incorporate the players attributes but the timing of your shot is still pretty much the key.

**Graphik** · 10-14-2004, 09:28 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

Just the timing. Once you master it, you can hit the majority of your shots. They also incorporate the players attributes but the timing of your shot is still pretty much the key.

**bkrich83** · 10-14-2004, 10:05 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

Originally posted by Graphik

Just the timing. Once you master it, you can hit the majority of your shots. They also incorporate the players attributes but the timing of your shot is still pretty much the key.

Which is why I use CPU. I want the ratings to matter.

**bkrich83** · 10-14-2004, 10:05 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

Originally posted by Graphik

Just the timing. Once you master it, you can hit the majority of your shots. They also incorporate the players attributes but the timing of your shot is still pretty much the key.

Which is why I use CPU. I want the ratings to matter.

**Miles_Yuhas** · 10-14-2004, 10:38 PM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

The ratings matter heavily. You just have to release at the right time. If you don't than the % of making that shot will go down. Just cause a good release is better than a bad release means that the ratings don't matter?

**Miles_Yuhas** · 10-14-2004, 10:38 PM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

The ratings matter heavily. You just have to release at the right time. If you don't than the % of making that shot will go down. Just cause a good release is better than a bad release means that the ratings don't matter?

**Jistic** · 10-15-2004, 08:02 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

TO think that user shot control is only timing and not ratings is false. I use user shot control and after 25 games in my Orlando franchise the players stats match up to their ratings. If players have a better ratings you have more of a margin for error.

If this really was true, then everyone on my team would shoot about the same FG% which is most definitely NOT the case. Steve Francis shoots about 41%, Mobley about 45%, Dwight Howard 50%. And from 3pt range you really see where ratings matter. Torkuglu is shooting 40% yet Francis is at 20% Hell my center was shooting 35%! Yet the Great Pat Garrity my backup Power Forward is shooting about 59%.

I don't understand why you'd want the CPU to shoot for you anyway, it's like having the CPU pass for you in a football game. What's the point?

**Jistic** · 10-15-2004, 08:02 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

TO think that user shot control is only timing and not ratings is false. I use user shot control and after 25 games in my Orlando franchise the players stats match up to their ratings. If players have a better ratings you have more of a margin for error.

If this really was true, then everyone on my team would shoot about the same FG% which is most definitely NOT the case. Steve Francis shoots about 41%, Mobley about 45%, Dwight Howard 50%. And from 3pt range you really see where ratings matter. Torkuglu is shooting 40% yet Francis is at 20% Hell my center was shooting 35%! Yet the Great Pat Garrity my backup Power Forward is shooting about 59%.

I don't understand why you'd want the CPU to shoot for you anyway, it's like having the CPU pass for you in a football game. What's the point?

**Pared** · 10-15-2004, 08:10 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

Originally posted by Jistic

I don't understand why you'd want the CPU to shoot for you anyway, it's like having the CPU pass for you in a football game. What's the point?

Actually some people enjoy doing that. I'm not one of them, but I know they're out there... somewhere...

**Pared** · 10-15-2004, 08:10 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

Originally posted by Jistic

I don't understand why you'd want the CPU to shoot for you anyway, it's like having the CPU pass for you in a football game. What's the point?

Actually some people enjoy doing that. I'm not one of them, but I know they're out there... somewhere...

**bkrich83** · 10-15-2004, 09:47 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

Originally posted by Jistic

TO think that user shot control is only timing and not ratings is false. I use user shot control and after 25 games in my Orlando franchise the players stats match up to their ratings. If players have a better ratings you have more of a margin for error.

If this really was true, then everyone on my team would shoot about the same FG% which is most definitely NOT the case. Steve Francis shoots about 41%, Mobley about 45%, Dwight Howard 50%. And from 3pt range you really see where ratings matter. Torkuglu is shooting 40% yet Francis is at 20% Hell my center was shooting 35%! Yet the Great Pat Garrity my backup Power Forward is shooting about 59%.

I don't understand why you'd want the CPU to shoot for you anyway, it's like having the CPU pass for you in a football game. What's the point?

The CPU doesnt shoot for you. It's just that the timing doesnt matter and the chances of the shot going in are dictated purely by ratings of the player.

**bkrich83** · 10-15-2004, 09:47 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

Originally posted by Jistic

TO think that user shot control is only timing and not ratings is false. I use user shot control and after 25 games in my Orlando franchise the players stats match up to their ratings. If players have a better ratings you have more of a margin for error.

If this really was true, then everyone on my team would shoot about the same FG% which is most definitely NOT the case. Steve Francis shoots about 41%, Mobley about 45%, Dwight Howard 50%. And from 3pt range you really see where ratings matter. Torkuglu is shooting 40% yet Francis is at 20% Hell my center was shooting 35%! Yet the Great Pat Garrity my backup Power Forward is shooting about 59%.

I don't understand why you'd want the CPU to shoot for you anyway, it's like having the CPU pass for you in a football game. What's the point?

The CPU doesnt shoot for you. It's just that the timing doesnt matter and the chances of the shot going in are dictated purely by ratings of the player.

**NoleFan** · 10-15-2004, 09:51 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

CPU Shot control all day over here for the exact reason that bk mentioned.

**NoleFan** · 10-15-2004, 09:51 AM

Re: User vs. Cpu shot control......

CPU Shot control all day over here for the exact reason that bk mentioned.

User vs. Cpu shot control......

Recommended Videos

User vs. Cpu shot control......

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment