I think it's pretty much clear that all contending teams have things working for themselves already... I mean of course Boston, who won a championship with Rondo and Allen won't be sending one of them to the bench. Of Course LA won't be sending D. Fisher or Kobe to the bench... They already did that with Gary Payton and lost to Detroit in the finals, you gotta stick with what's been working.
Better players wont always = Better Team
Every team needs role players. All contenders already have their stars. They have their scorers. Therefore no need to sign Allen Iverson.
People think Iverson couldn't get signed by a contender because he is not good enough or "washed up". He couldn't get signed by a contender because every contender has their scorer already and Iverson made it clear he is not ready to accept being a role player.
Iverson obviously does not want to piggy back a title. He wants to be able to lead and be a top guy. Sadly, all contenders already have that guy.
People keep judging him by their own standards, saying things like "he should come off the bench and settle for a lesser role to win a title". If I had a choice between having Karl Malone's career, or Robert Horry's. I pick Karl Malone. If I could pick between Patrick Ewing's career or Kendrick Perkins, I chose Ewing.
It's pretty obvious Iverson has that same type of mentality. I want to play, I want to contribute in a major way. If I win a title, I want it to be because of me, not because I came off the bench for 20 minutes on an already great team.
I pick Money and Stardom both over rings any day.
Comment