Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigeastbumrush
    My Momma's Son
    • Feb 2003
    • 19245

    #106
    Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    So if Payton takes less money....how is he selling out? He wants a ring...do you blame him?

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    Question: What team offered Gary Payton more money than the exception?

    Comment

    • Slip
      MVP
      • Oct 2002
      • 1526

      #107
      Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

      The Bucks

      Comment

      • Slip
        MVP
        • Oct 2002
        • 1526

        #108
        Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

        The Bucks

        Comment

        • Slip
          MVP
          • Oct 2002
          • 1526

          #109
          Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

          The Bucks

          Comment

          • aholbert32
            (aka Alberto)
            • Jul 2002
            • 33106

            #110
            Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            bigeastbumrush said:
            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            So if Payton takes less money....how is he selling out? He wants a ring...do you blame him?

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            Question: What team offered Gary Payton more money than the exception?

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            miami offered 8 mil a year

            Comment

            • aholbert32
              (aka Alberto)
              • Jul 2002
              • 33106

              #111
              Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              bigeastbumrush said:
              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              So if Payton takes less money....how is he selling out? He wants a ring...do you blame him?

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              Question: What team offered Gary Payton more money than the exception?

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              miami offered 8 mil a year

              Comment

              • aholbert32
                (aka Alberto)
                • Jul 2002
                • 33106

                #112
                Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                bigeastbumrush said:
                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                So if Payton takes less money....how is he selling out? He wants a ring...do you blame him?

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                Question: What team offered Gary Payton more money than the exception?

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                miami offered 8 mil a year

                Comment

                • ShaKobe
                  G* L*k* Sh*w!!!
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 2964

                  #113
                  Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                  Portland offered a sign and trade that would have gotten GP around $10 million.

                  Comment

                  • ShaKobe
                    G* L*k* Sh*w!!!
                    • Sep 2002
                    • 2964

                    #114
                    Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                    Portland offered a sign and trade that would have gotten GP around $10 million.

                    Comment

                    • ShaKobe
                      G* L*k* Sh*w!!!
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 2964

                      #115
                      Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                      Portland offered a sign and trade that would have gotten GP around $10 million.

                      Comment

                      • Programmed2Kill
                        Banned
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 14644

                        #116
                        Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        aholbert32 said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Programmed2Kill said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        aholbert32 said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Programmed2Kill said:
                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        ShaKobe said:
                        Here's an interesting comment I just read at ESPN.com

                        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                        Josh ( Santa Barbara): Is the 2003-2004 Laker starting lineup going to be the best in NBA history? ( 4 future hall of famers!!!)

                        Ken Bikoff: (5:32 PM ET ) I think it could be extraordinarily dangerous for the Lakers to have that much talent on the starting lineup. I don't think it makes the Lakers a lock to win the title because you could run into a Trail Blazers-type of situation. Too many stars and not enough role players. Will Payton defer to Kobe in the crunch? Will Malone, if he signs, be willing to be the third or fourth option on offense? Will Shaq be able to get along with all three? Will Payton and Malone pick up the triangle offense quickly? There are a lot of questions with that type of lineup. They would be the favorites to win, but by no means a lock.


                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        I kinda agree with that. All 4 of these guys are going to need to check their egos for the entire season. They will need to work together and respect each others game.

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                        that fool actually asked if that Lakers team would be the best in history??? Lord...there's some people that just don't know basketball.



                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        Well, I know basketball and while i wont say that this years lakers will have the greatest lineup in history, you can make an argument. Cmon, they have 4 future hall of famers on their team. Not many teams can say that.

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        oh yeah? tell that to certain past Lakers, Celtics and Sixers teams



                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        As I said only a few teams can say that. Celtics in the 60's, 70's 80's. Lakers in the 70 and 80's and the sixers of the 80's. Thats only about 5 or 6 actual teams there. Like I said I dont think they are the greatest lineup but an argument vcan be made.

                        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                        and the '67 Sixers but anyway, i still can't see an argument to put this new Lakers team anywhere. the Bulls teams from the 90s' could even take out this team. not saying this year's Laers won't be good. i think it will win the title.

                        Comment

                        • Programmed2Kill
                          Banned
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 14644

                          #117
                          Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          aholbert32 said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          Programmed2Kill said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          aholbert32 said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          Programmed2Kill said:
                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          ShaKobe said:
                          Here's an interesting comment I just read at ESPN.com

                          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                          Josh ( Santa Barbara): Is the 2003-2004 Laker starting lineup going to be the best in NBA history? ( 4 future hall of famers!!!)

                          Ken Bikoff: (5:32 PM ET ) I think it could be extraordinarily dangerous for the Lakers to have that much talent on the starting lineup. I don't think it makes the Lakers a lock to win the title because you could run into a Trail Blazers-type of situation. Too many stars and not enough role players. Will Payton defer to Kobe in the crunch? Will Malone, if he signs, be willing to be the third or fourth option on offense? Will Shaq be able to get along with all three? Will Payton and Malone pick up the triangle offense quickly? There are a lot of questions with that type of lineup. They would be the favorites to win, but by no means a lock.


                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          I kinda agree with that. All 4 of these guys are going to need to check their egos for the entire season. They will need to work together and respect each others game.

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                          that fool actually asked if that Lakers team would be the best in history??? Lord...there's some people that just don't know basketball.



                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          Well, I know basketball and while i wont say that this years lakers will have the greatest lineup in history, you can make an argument. Cmon, they have 4 future hall of famers on their team. Not many teams can say that.

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          oh yeah? tell that to certain past Lakers, Celtics and Sixers teams



                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          As I said only a few teams can say that. Celtics in the 60's, 70's 80's. Lakers in the 70 and 80's and the sixers of the 80's. Thats only about 5 or 6 actual teams there. Like I said I dont think they are the greatest lineup but an argument vcan be made.

                          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                          and the '67 Sixers but anyway, i still can't see an argument to put this new Lakers team anywhere. the Bulls teams from the 90s' could even take out this team. not saying this year's Laers won't be good. i think it will win the title.

                          Comment

                          • Programmed2Kill
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 14644

                            #118
                            Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            aholbert32 said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            Programmed2Kill said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            aholbert32 said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            Programmed2Kill said:
                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            ShaKobe said:
                            Here's an interesting comment I just read at ESPN.com

                            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                            Josh ( Santa Barbara): Is the 2003-2004 Laker starting lineup going to be the best in NBA history? ( 4 future hall of famers!!!)

                            Ken Bikoff: (5:32 PM ET ) I think it could be extraordinarily dangerous for the Lakers to have that much talent on the starting lineup. I don't think it makes the Lakers a lock to win the title because you could run into a Trail Blazers-type of situation. Too many stars and not enough role players. Will Payton defer to Kobe in the crunch? Will Malone, if he signs, be willing to be the third or fourth option on offense? Will Shaq be able to get along with all three? Will Payton and Malone pick up the triangle offense quickly? There are a lot of questions with that type of lineup. They would be the favorites to win, but by no means a lock.


                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            I kinda agree with that. All 4 of these guys are going to need to check their egos for the entire season. They will need to work together and respect each others game.

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


                            that fool actually asked if that Lakers team would be the best in history??? Lord...there's some people that just don't know basketball.



                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            Well, I know basketball and while i wont say that this years lakers will have the greatest lineup in history, you can make an argument. Cmon, they have 4 future hall of famers on their team. Not many teams can say that.

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            oh yeah? tell that to certain past Lakers, Celtics and Sixers teams



                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            As I said only a few teams can say that. Celtics in the 60's, 70's 80's. Lakers in the 70 and 80's and the sixers of the 80's. Thats only about 5 or 6 actual teams there. Like I said I dont think they are the greatest lineup but an argument vcan be made.

                            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                            and the '67 Sixers but anyway, i still can't see an argument to put this new Lakers team anywhere. the Bulls teams from the 90s' could even take out this team. not saying this year's Laers won't be good. i think it will win the title.

                            Comment

                            • ShaKobe
                              G* L*k* Sh*w!!!
                              • Sep 2002
                              • 2964

                              #119
                              Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                              Good article just written on ESPN.com

                              GP to LA

                              Comment

                              • ShaKobe
                                G* L*k* Sh*w!!!
                                • Sep 2002
                                • 2964

                                #120
                                Re: Gary Payton agrees to be a Laker....

                                Good article just written on ESPN.com

                                GP to LA

                                Comment

                                Working...