Stackhouse to Milwaukee

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • J.R. Locke
    Banned
    • Nov 2004
    • 4137

    #16
    Re: Stackhouse to Milwaukee

    Originally posted by mvspree8
    And Stack will be a very good addition to the roster -- he's still capable of dropping 30 on a good day and his aggressiveness will hopefully be a good example for the younger guys.
    Say what? This isn't 99.

    Comment

    • JohnDoe8865
      Hall of Fame
      • Jul 2002
      • 9607

      #17
      Re: Stackhouse to Milwaukee

      Originally posted by mvspree8
      He'd have to wait until next year, because Bell isn't allowed to change numbers now.

      And Stack will be a very good addition to the roster -- he's still capable of dropping 30 on a good day and his aggressiveness will hopefully be a good example for the younger guys.

      And BTW, Joe Alexander sucks, plain and simple. He couldn't even get PT on a relatively thin Bucks squad last season.
      Favorite Sports Teams

      NFL - Carolina Panthers
      NBA - Charlotte Hornets
      MLB - Cincinnati Reds
      College Basketball - Wake Forest
      NCAA Football - Appalachian State

      Comment

      • jsg
        Pro
        • Jul 2004
        • 529

        #18
        Re: Stackhouse to Milwaukee

        i can drop 30 on a very very good day. the Bucks should sign me
        Psn: Sprigg

        Comment

        • roadman
          *ll St*r
          • Aug 2003
          • 26339

          #19
          Re: Stackhouse to Milwaukee

          He won't hurt the Bucks, though.

          The Bucks are atrocious in drawing fouls(jump shooting team) and Skiles feels Stackhouse can be aggressive in going to the hoop.

          Stack said he had a choice of going to a playoff contender or someone like the Bucks who are young and are only two games short of the playoffs. He figured he would get more minutes with the Bucks as well.

          Comment

          • mvspree8
            Pro
            • Mar 2007
            • 580

            #20
            Re: Stackhouse to Milwaukee

            Originally posted by J.R. Locke
            Say what? This isn't 99.
            Originally posted by JohnDoe8865
            Originally posted by jsg
            i can drop 30 on a very very good day. the Bucks should sign me
            I'd be willing to bet a pretty penny that if Stackhouse comes back and he's healthy, he'll hit 30pts at least once during the season. That's all I meant.

            Comment

            • Shinyhubcaps
              MVP
              • Oct 2007
              • 1786

              #21
              Re: Stackhouse to Milwaukee

              Stack did really well with rebounds and assists. He hit his 900th career 3-pointer; Michael Redd, on the other hand, is stuck on 999.

              Originally posted by mvspree8
              I'd be willing to bet a pretty penny that if Stackhouse comes back and he's healthy, he'll hit 30pts at least once during the season. That's all I meant.
              Unfortunately, the Bucks have only had 4 30-point performances this season. Their scoring distribution is too spread-out to have Stackhouse get 30. He might get upwards of Ilyasova's, Delfino's, Ridnour's, or Warrick's highs given his role on the team (24, 28, 23, and 23 respectively).

              So I guess it's possible to approach 30, but I don't think he'll score more than 23.

              (His number is 24, by the way. That was my biggest concern.)

              Comment

              • vikes26
                Rookie
                • Dec 2009
                • 29

                #22
                i thought he had retired as well. i don't know what he will help them do other than knock down some 3's.

                Comment

                Working...