Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

**Skins4Life** · 02-05-2004, 06:37 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
bigeastbumrush said:
Last I checked, rivalries span more than 2 years. Not sure when you started wathcing, but this has been going on for more than 2 years. And if you think it hasn't been competitive, then you haven't been paying attention.

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
1. No, it was Jamaal Tinsleys mom dieing, REggie Miller being injured, Jermaine's dad having a self inflected gun shot wound, all that mixed in with soome questionable caching moves. I dont see all of that happening again this yr

<hr /></blockquote>

Heh, you left off Al Harrington having a hang nail.

Just kidding, but there's a million and one excuses that any losing team can come up with to try and justify a loss. If this was such a meaningless game, you shouldn't be getting all worked up over one loss.

<hr /></blockquote>

That was my point. It WAS a rivalry, but has been dead lately. The Pacers have been in teh plyoffs, while the Knicks havent even made it there. I have been watching since the 1998 NBA season, BTW.

I know you were kidding, and Indy had lost of reasons for there total collapse, but they had players losing parents and other crazy things that you would never expect. Not saying that is a excuse.

Im not getting worked up over the game, Im getting worked up over the fact that NY players can bash Oneal, fo rjsut being passionate about the game he opalys

**NYJets** · 02-05-2004, 06:42 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

**NYJets** · 02-05-2004, 06:42 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

**NYJets** · 02-05-2004, 06:42 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

**Skins4Life** · 02-05-2004, 06:48 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

**Skins4Life** · 02-05-2004, 06:48 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

**Skins4Life** · 02-05-2004, 06:48 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

**NYJets** · 02-05-2004, 09:18 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

<hr /></blockquote>

Talk about not reading posts.

Listen re-read my post so you don't change around 99% of what I said, and stop contradicting every thing you say. Then come back.

**NYJets** · 02-05-2004, 09:18 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

<hr /></blockquote>

Talk about not reading posts.

Listen re-read my post so you don't change around 99% of what I said, and stop contradicting every thing you say. Then come back.

**NYJets** · 02-05-2004, 09:18 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

<hr /></blockquote>

Talk about not reading posts.

Listen re-read my post so you don't change around 99% of what I said, and stop contradicting every thing you say. Then come back.

**Skins4Life** · 02-05-2004, 09:22 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

<hr /></blockquote>

Talk about not reading posts.

Listen re-read my post so you don't change around 99% of what I said, and stop contradicting every thing you say. Then come back.

<hr /></blockquote>

This is getting pointless. I didnt change around anything you said. I simply respond to your "claims", you dotn like my answers, do decide that I am changing my stance. Obviously you cant handle the truth

**Skins4Life** · 02-05-2004, 09:22 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

<hr /></blockquote>

Talk about not reading posts.

Listen re-read my post so you don't change around 99% of what I said, and stop contradicting every thing you say. Then come back.

<hr /></blockquote>

This is getting pointless. I didnt change around anything you said. I simply respond to your "claims", you dotn like my answers, do decide that I am changing my stance. Obviously you cant handle the truth

**Skins4Life** · 02-05-2004, 09:22 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
Skins4Life said:
<blockquote>Quote:<hr />
NYJets37 said:
2. You continue to bring that up, yet you just dismiss the Knicks playing without their best player as unimportant. Both teams were dealing with injuries, but the Knicks injuries were worse.

3. Again, what so many people have told you, yet you fail to understand is that MARBURY IS NOT THE ONE TALKING LIKE HE IS SOMEONE WHO'S WON 5 CHAMPIONSHIPS, AND GOES DEEP INTO THE PLAYOFFS EVERY YEAR. Marbury is just saying that people who haven't done that much shouldn't talk like they have, and he's 100% right.

<hr /></blockquote>

2. When the hell did I do that? I have said they were shorthanded. I made the comment jockinglly about them playing better without him, but wheever your best player is out and you win, it is impressive.

3. You people are putting words into his mouth. JO said he didnt like the way NY celebrated. Then Steph has to reant about wins. WHen did Steph take shots about Phon winning in the playoffs

<hr /></blockquote>

You've used the excuse that O'Neal was hurt in just about every post about the game, yet don't even mention that Houston was hurt and didn't even play. Sure, you might add in a "but I still give credit to the Knicks," but it's pretty obvious you are making excuses, just like you did for the Pacers falling apart last season.

And if you want to try and act like Jermaine was just saying the he didn't like the way the Knicks celebrated, go right ahead. Everyone else who isn't thickheaded will know that when he says "we'll rememeber that" he's talking about the playoffs, and talking like he knows about going deep in the playoffs.

<hr /></blockquote>

Yes, because O Neal isnt a big part of this team. Excuses? If anyone is to thickheaded enough to realize that grown men going through personal issues and bad coaching can affect a team, than I have nothing further to say, as your ignorance can not be matched.

Are you reading my [censored] posts. I did mention he as hurt, I even made a joke that he shouldnt ever play, cause they seem to paly better whe he is on the IL.

As for JO comments, I never said he didnt mean those comments. Way to put words into my mouth. He said he idnt like the way they celebrated in one line. In the other he had a point, seeing how they have the best record in the east, and the top 3 in the NBA.

<hr /></blockquote>

Talk about not reading posts.

Listen re-read my post so you don't change around 99% of what I said, and stop contradicting every thing you say. Then come back.

<hr /></blockquote>

This is getting pointless. I didnt change around anything you said. I simply respond to your "claims", you dotn like my answers, do decide that I am changing my stance. Obviously you cant handle the truth

**jordan0386** · 02-05-2004, 11:30 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

a jermaine oneal led team has not made it past the 1st round
a stephon marbury led team has not made it past the 1 st round

so they both have done nothing...so why are we all arguing

**jordan0386** · 02-05-2004, 11:30 PM

Re: Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

a jermaine oneal led team has not made it past the 1st round
a stephon marbury led team has not made it past the 1 st round

so they both have done nothing...so why are we all arguing

Apparently, the Knicks are not happy with JO

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment