2014 Draft Discussion
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
For Michigan Stauskas is gone but I think there is chance for McGary to be back. GR3 I truly don't know.Wolverines Packers Cubs Celtics
Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Haven't watched much of the Harrison twins until the sec tourney and so far in the ncaa tourney. I think both guys will be better pros than college players. I could see both being potential starters on a contending team. Think for both of them their best role would be as the first guard off the bench. Can be a combo type who might actually have enough size to slide to the 3 in some lineups.
I'd rather have Andrew Harrison than Tyler Ennis, although I wouldn't touch either in the lottery.
His issue with me is still scoring. I think if you are a team who is needing their pick to be one of the focal points of the offense he's not the pick for them. But you have to take him early because his size, strength, rebounding makes him one of the more NBA-ready players in the draft.
Honestly if I was a team that already had scorers but lacked a great PF I would take him as early as possible. It'll be interesting to see where the Lakers pick is, with Kobe, Young, Meeks, Johnson, etc on the wing capable of scoring and 14 point guards already on the roster I think he would be a great addition for them.Cincinnati Reds University of Kentucky Cincinnati Bengals
@GoReds1994Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Seems like Saric is going to Efes in Turkey, not the NBA.Khalabeeb - Tony Henderson
Stiopic - Brock
Originally posted by areobee401Positive HIV test results > fans talking class in sports
Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Haven't watched much of the Harrison twins until the sec tourney and so far in the ncaa tourney. I think both guys will be better pros than college players. I could see both being potential starters on a contending team. Think for both of them their best role would be as the first guard off the bench. Can be a combo type who might actually have enough size to slide to the 3 in some lineups.He doesn't have the jumper and the total inside package that ZBo has. He literally has to barrel him way close enough to the rim to hit that little left handed shot. It's been pretty easy for him in college because he's bigger/stronger than everyone but also quick enough to get by big men. It'll be a completely different game for him when he first hits the league.. If he can add that stuff to his game this offseason before he hits the court as a pro he could be very solid..
Either way I don't think ZBo is the best comparison for him, I think it's easy for people to say because they look alike with similar build lol... ZBo had 10times the touch Randle has and Randle is quite a bit more athletic than Zack has ever been.
He has awesome potential as a rebounder.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
And he's always had it with either hand, posting up or off a face up..
What worries me most about Randle is that I've been able to see Kentucky quite a few times since they are always on TV and I can count on one hand probably the number of times he's done something other than that left handed shot within two feet of the rim.. It's almost as if he has zero confidence in a jumpshot, or in finishing with his right hand, or in making any type of post move other than trying to knock his man out of his way. I would like to see him at least taking some jumpshots and miss them, rather than look like he has zero confidence in his ability to score unless he's within 5 foot of the rim..
Also he usually misses one or two times before every basket he scores. He throws his body into the defenders trying to get a foul instead of just making the shot. I don't think he'll be the biggest and strongest guy on an NBA court the way he is in college.. He won't be able to get 3 looks at half his shot attempts like he does now.
I'm not saying he won't or can't develop his game to become a better offensive player, I just don't think a team that desperately needs a scorer should take him within the top few picks. Still think he would be a strong fit with the Lakers, maybe the Bucks if they can't land Wiggins or Exum.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
probably would be the smart decision. only reasoning for me is he is projected to go in the 2nd round. So a year to prove he's healthy and in Beilein system could help that's all.Wolverines Packers Cubs Celtics
Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Noah Vonleh is entering the draft. I like that kid a lot and he's still young (doesn't turn 19 until August).
DX has him at #7, I'd go one notch higher if I were a GM and take him over Smart."You make your name in the regular season, and your fame in the postseason." - Clyde Frazier
"Beware of geeks bearing formulas." - Warren BuffetComment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Hardly nobody talking about LeBryan Nash? I think he can be an great defender and an solid 10-13 PPG guy going forward.I would draft based of his name alone haha.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
His problem is that he's too inconsistent & his jumper needs work. He's also not very aggressive offensively. Kinda reminds me of Perry Jones
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
So most mock drafts I've saw have Philly taking Embiid, whether it's with the first pick or third pick or wherever they have them finishing.. Am I the only one this doesn't make any sense at all to? They just got Noel, unless their is zero faith in him to become a good player from management this makes zero sense to me.. You just gutted the entire team, you need a sure thing instead of banking on pure potential.. Just my opinion.
I would think Wiggins, Parker, Exum, Smart, would all be better choices for them at this point.. They have a starting front court of Young and Noel coming in to next season, and Sims has been alright for them since coming in the trade and should be decent as a bench option next season.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
So most mock drafts I've saw have Philly taking Embiid, whether it's with the first pick or third pick or wherever they have them finishing.. Am I the only one this doesn't make any sense at all to? They just got Noel, unless their is zero faith in him to become a good player from management this makes zero sense to me.. You just gutted the entire team, you need a sure thing instead of banking on pure potential.. Just my opinion.
I would think Wiggins, Parker, Exum, Smart, would all be better choices for them at this point.. They have a starting front court of Young and Noel coming in to next season, and Sims has been alright for them since coming in the trade and should be decent as a bench option next season.
That lineup would have some offensive problems, but a core of MCW-Noel-Wiggins-Smart is pretty good.Last edited by redsrule; 03-25-2014, 11:42 AM.Cincinnati Reds University of Kentucky Cincinnati Bengals
@GoReds1994Comment
Comment