I"m a Laker fan and I have to admit

[driddy]

Re: I\"m a Laker fan and I have to admit

Can we cease with the myths about the refs? Shaq had 2 ft attempts last game, so the argument is null and void. Also it defies logic, if a ref is going to call a game favorably for the Lakers, then they would do it regardless of the arena. Unless all of a sudden the Staples Center became Cameron Indoor stadium, I doubt the Laker fans are influencing the referees to make any home team calls.

As for being demoralized, not hardly, I know that it is a seven game series, not best out of three. Ask the spurs about celebrating too early. Things happen in the playoffs, so dont celebrate too early. Unless you have a fond taste for the crow.

[ndeezlo]

Re: I\"m a Laker fan and I have to admit

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ndeezlo said:
To get a flagrant foul you have to not be playing the ball, by putting Clockwork in a headlock, he was not playing the ball. Thus a flagrant foul should've been called.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

That's right I'm quoting myself, DETROIT WHAT!!!

I thought it was self-explanotory but I guess not, there has to be a chance at injury as well as not playing the ball. This seems to go with what is an intentional foul and what is a flagrant foul. The refs should call an intentional foul during Hack-a-Shaq, I have no problem with that. but intentional and flagrant are completely different.

[ndeezlo]

Re: I\"m a Laker fan and I have to admit

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ndeezlo said:
To get a flagrant foul you have to not be playing the ball, by putting Clockwork in a headlock, he was not playing the ball. Thus a flagrant foul should've been called.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

That's right I'm quoting myself, DETROIT WHAT!!!

I thought it was self-explanotory but I guess not, there has to be a chance at injury as well as not playing the ball. This seems to go with what is an intentional foul and what is a flagrant foul. The refs should call an intentional foul during Hack-a-Shaq, I have no problem with that. but intentional and flagrant are completely different.

[ndeezlo]

Re: I\"m a Laker fan and I have to admit

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
ndeezlo said:
To get a flagrant foul you have to not be playing the ball, by putting Clockwork in a headlock, he was not playing the ball. Thus a flagrant foul should've been called.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

That's right I'm quoting myself, DETROIT WHAT!!!

I thought it was self-explanotory but I guess not, there has to be a chance at injury as well as not playing the ball. This seems to go with what is an intentional foul and what is a flagrant foul. The refs should call an intentional foul during Hack-a-Shaq, I have no problem with that. but intentional and flagrant are completely different.

[backbreaker]

Re: I\"m a Laker fan and I have to admit

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
backbreaker said:
That if the Refs allow Rasheed to play the pistons would sweep the lakers.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I still stand by this quote.

[backbreaker]

Re: I\"m a Laker fan and I have to admit

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
backbreaker said:
That if the Refs allow Rasheed to play the pistons would sweep the lakers.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I still stand by this quote.

[backbreaker]

Re: I\"m a Laker fan and I have to admit

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
backbreaker said:
That if the Refs allow Rasheed to play the pistons would sweep the lakers.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I still stand by this quote.