It just shows you Curry is on another level than the rest. Curry is better than Jordan was in his time. The talent pool has more to do with that. But still.
NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
It just shows you Curry is on another level than the rest. Curry is better than Jordan was in his time. The talent pool has more to do with that. But still. -
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
It doesn't show you that at all.Originally posted by G PericoIf I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
The clique just a gang of bosses that linked upComment
-
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
"Curry is better than Jordan was in his time"
Oh boy...#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
The stuff curry is doing is more than Jordan did. But the talent in Jordan year was deeper. But to be the first unanimous player is showing you that. Jordan is still the better player. But still. You win with all the votes in my book that means you are on a level that Jordan never reached. But again the talent was so much better in Jordan's years.Last edited by Hockeynut99; 05-10-2016, 01:30 PM.Comment
-
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
The stuff curry is doing is more than Jordan did. But the talent in Jordan year was deeper. But to be the first unanimous player is showing you that. Jordan is still the better player. But still. You win with all the votes in my book that means you are on a level that Jordan never reached. But again the talent was so much better in Jordan's years.Comment
-
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
No the talent level was so much more closer to Jordan back then. Then it is to Curry this year. Now I am not saying he is better than Jordan. Read in between the lines in what I am saying. Jordan is still the greatest ever! In my opinion.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
I don't. You're drawing a conclusion from the results that can't be drawn. Curry being the first unanimous player doesn't prove Jordan's years were deeper, that he's that much more superior, or anything else. Like Aero said, we do this every year in seemingly every sport, someone will say "Well Derek Jeter is going to the hall anyway, he doesn't need my vote, I'll give it to someone else" or "Well everyone knows Jordan was the best player, but I write for this paper so im giving it to our local guy". The results of the voting don't tell us anything about anything either than the people voting.Originally posted by G PericoIf I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
The clique just a gang of bosses that linked upComment
-
Comment
-
-
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
I just made a similar comment in the NBA 2K forum cause someone made a thread "Should Curry make a case for being a 99 overall or better?"Comment
-
Re: NBA MVP: Stephen Curry
Talent pool in Jordans years was much better than what Curry going toComment
Comment