I honestly have no idea about what you are talking about. I wont talk about anyone else. I'll talk about me.
I said in the past that I dont recall a single time where a thread or idea of yours was brought up behind the scenes in a positive way. I do recall where several other people here have had other threads that were and some of those ideas were built on by the devs. I also recall running a search in our old GC Slack just to confirm what I said and my search confirmed it.
I stand by that statement. I swear on my child that if there was evidence of an idea that originated with you appearing in the game...I would tell you.
No one is smearing your idea. I dont like the idea. I can dislike an idea without it being a smear.
I also dont have to write paragraphs defending my position every time that I disagree with someone. Just like I dont write paragraphs agreeing about ideas I agree with. I like it....and move on. I say I dont like it....and try to move on. The issue is you wont let anyone move on.
Let me restate something again: Just because something you write here appears in the game doesnt mean that you were the one who came up with the idea. For example, I'm sure I can find someone on this forum who said we should add driving takedowns and now we have driving takedowns. Now its possible that GPD saw that post and said "Lets add driving takedowns at the next mo cap session". Its also possible that driving takedowns have been on his mo cap list for years (well before the post) and he wasnt able to get them in the game until recently.
Finally, if you cant tell, I like to argue and debate. I'm a lawyer. Its part of what I do everyday and I love it. With that said, I dont enjoy debating you because the debates go down the same rabbit hole and its stops being worth my time. Like I could lay out every reason I think an unbeatable AI is a waste of resources. I do stuff like that all the time when defending a position. The problem is based on past experiences, I know you arent going to move one inch off of your current position and you will likely just restate what you said over and over again.
Also, your focus is completely wrong. You waste SO MUCH time trying to convince GCs about your ideas. Having GC support would be nice but there are a good amount of ideas that have been added to the game that dont have full or any GC support.
You want your unbeatable AI to be added to the game? Convince Skynet. Dont get mad because Solid wont "like" your post. Dont get mad at me because I dont feel like having a full out debate with you about this subject. I think its a bad idea but here is the thing...if Skynet puts it in the game, it doesnt matter to me. I just wouldnt ever play that mode/difficulty level. Thats why I didnt comment on it.
Your current approach isnt likely to convince anyone so focus on ways to correct that instead of who likes your idea.
Comment