Should Anthony smith be in the game?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aholbert32
    (aka Alberto)
    • Jul 2002
    • 33106

    #46
    Re: Should Anthony smith be in the game?

    Originally posted by 1212headkick
    Ill probably play it but its going to feel like ive been taken advantage of in some way. I brought up the ground game because you compared the roster to ud3 which was LAST gen with more features that are benchmarks not met in this series and a very bad comparison to make. That was very clear.

    You just deflected because its a point that shuts down any excuse your making(when someone says "im not trying to do this" its a manipulation tactic. Just so they can not be confronted on it) I understand your friends with the owner of this board. But thats the exact reason you shouldnt be trusted and the same reason your a gc. No insults. Just stating my opinion.
    .

    We need a complete roster like madden has. We shouldnt change our expectations because its ufc.
    That comparison wasnt clear at all. I was talking about the roster. This thread is about the roster. I brought up THQ's rosters because there has never been a combat sports game with a complete roster. Its not just an EA thing.

    Its not a manipultion tactic. I'm addressing you with facts. Its a fact that no combat sports game has ever had a "complete roster". Its a fact that EA UFC's art resources are small and are shared with other teams.

    Now you want to get personal. Thats cool. I can do that too. I'm a GC because GPD liked my the information I provided for UFC 1 here on ways to improve offline and AI. Thats it. He had EA reach out to me because of that to join the team. You would know that if you knew this board's history. You dont because you are just some guy who started posting here less than a year ago. You dont know **** so I'm not surprised you created some ******* theory about why I'm a GC.

    Speaking of ******* theories, lets start with "we need a complete roster just like Madden". EA could absolutely do that. Madden has actual face scans for maybe 40-50% of the roster. Tattoos for maybe 3 or 4 players. Bodytypes that are regularly wrong.

    The fact that you bring up Madden is laughable. Why? Because if EA added just added a generic white dude with an afro and said "Introducing Ben Askren", you would be the first one bitching that EA's Askren doesnt look like Ben Askren. Madden is the worst ****ing example you couldve chosen but I'm not shocked that you would actually choose the worst ****ing example based on your posting history.

    NBA 2k would be a better example but even they arent perfect. There is a good 10% of the roster that doesnt have face scans or even look like the person they are in real life. Now most people dont care because those players are low level players.

    So yes EA could do what they do with Madden but all that would do is change your bitching from missing fighters to "The fighters dont look like themselves".

    Comment

    Working...