UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • redsrule
    All Star
    • Apr 2010
    • 9396

    #31
    Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

    Originally posted by aholbert32
    Lineker missed weight AGAIN. 1 pound over.
    He cut the additional pound, so he made weight now. An hour late, but better than never I guess. He really needs to get with Dolce.
    Cincinnati Reds University of Kentucky Cincinnati Bengals
    @GoReds1994

    Comment

    • p_rushing
      Hall Of Fame
      • Feb 2004
      • 14514

      #32
      Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

      Originally posted by Thrash13
      I'm not sure why, but I'm picking Mir in this fight. Both guys are going to be fighting for their jobs more than likely, and I think Mir wants to keep his more and will prove it against Overeem. I'm hopeful he can get it to the ground somehow and submit him. Like others have stated, Overeem will probably annihilate him in the clinch if they stay on their feet.
      Reem looked in shape. Mir actually weighed about 1-2 LBs more than Reem. Mir took everything off and Reem left jeans, belt, and shoes on. If Reem is actually serious about his cardio training, then he could be scary.

      Only way Mir wins is if Reem has no cardio or he fools around like in the Big Foot fight.

      Comment

      • ManiacMatt1782
        Who? Giroux!
        • Jul 2006
        • 3982

        #33
        Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

        Or if he catches Reem's glass jaw. Mir doesn't take punishment well, But Reem tends to get KO's by a stiff breeze, and Mir has some pop in his hands, even if his striking defense is poor.
        www.twitch.tv/maniacmatt1228
        www.youtube.com/maniacmatt1782

        Comment

        • aholbert32
          (aka Alberto)
          • Jul 2002
          • 33106

          #34
          Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

          Originally posted by ManiacMatt1782
          Or if he catches Reem's glass jaw. Mir doesn't take punishment well, But Reem tends to get KO's by a stiff breeze, and Mir has some pop in his hands, even if his striking defense is poor.
          I dont know if I agree with that. His two UFC losses were due primarily to fatigue and the Silva KO was a vicious combo not even close to a stiff breeze.

          Comment

          • TheShizNo1
            Asst 2 the Comm Manager
            • Mar 2007
            • 26341

            #35
            Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

            I know it's a while ago, but Reem used to bite the dust like that in Pride too.

            Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
            Originally posted by Mo
            Just once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.
            Originally posted by Mo
            You underestimate my laziness
            Originally posted by Mo
            **** ya


            ...

            Comment

            • ex carrabba fan
              I'll thank him for you
              • Oct 2004
              • 32744

              #36
              Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

              I would say Reem doesn't have a granite chin. Going off his history, you could make the argument he has a glass jaw.

              I totally forgot Liniker was on the card, lol at him not coming exactly on weight to begin with. Dude is just asking for something bad to happen to his career.

              Comment

              • The Chef
                Moderator
                • Sep 2003
                • 13684

                #37
                Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                Anyone got a link? For some reason every avenue I used to use wants me to suddenly download some video player that it never did before which seems highly suspect. PM me please and thanks.
                http://www.twitch.tv/kitm9891

                Comment

                • redsrule
                  All Star
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 9396

                  #38
                  Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                  Prelims were awful lol. Hopefully the main card delivers.
                  Cincinnati Reds University of Kentucky Cincinnati Bengals
                  @GoReds1994

                  Comment

                  • LingeringRegime
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 17089

                    #39
                    Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                    Originally posted by The Chef
                    Anyone got a link? For some reason every avenue I used to use wants me to suddenly download some video player that it never did before which seems highly suspect. PM me please and thanks.
                    Same with me, anyone with a link please PM me.

                    Wow at that last decision for the prelims. I hope no other fight goes the distance who knows what will happen.
                    Last edited by LingeringRegime; 02-01-2014, 11:06 PM.

                    Comment

                    • p_rushing
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Feb 2004
                      • 14514

                      #40
                      Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                      Originally posted by redsrule
                      Prelims were awful lol. Hopefully the main card delivers.
                      the judging was worse, I couldn't believe some of those scores

                      Comment

                      • p_rushing
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Feb 2004
                        • 14514

                        #41
                        Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                        1st fight delivered

                        Comment

                        • LingeringRegime
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Jun 2007
                          • 17089

                          #42
                          Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                          Wooooooow! Crazy *** fight!

                          Comment

                          • mestevo
                            Gooney Goo Goo
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 19556

                            #43
                            Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                            Awesome.

                            Sent from my VZW Note 3

                            Comment

                            • jeremym480
                              Speak it into existence
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 18198

                              #44
                              Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                              That was awesome. Dana can go ahead and make out the FOTN check to those two.

                              Sent from my VS920 4G using Tapatalk
                              My 2K17 Boston Celtics MyLeague

                              Alabama Crimson Tide
                              Green Bay Packers
                              Boston Celtics

                              New Orleans Pelicans

                              Comment

                              • redsrule
                                All Star
                                • Apr 2010
                                • 9396

                                #45
                                Re: UFC 169: Aldo v. Lamas/Barao v. Faber 2 - Feb. 1

                                That fight made up for the prelims. Awesome fight and even better KO there. FOTN is locked up.
                                Cincinnati Reds University of Kentucky Cincinnati Bengals
                                @GoReds1994

                                Comment

                                Working...