UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

[EJ_Manuel]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

I realllllyyyy need to rewatch that 2nd round.

[mestevo]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

How long does a broken foot hold you out for? Maybe say goodbye to MSG

6 months I think? Then doctors OK.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

[bballshawn24]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

LOL...but but there was no way Conor was going to win.

Trash decision

[The JareBear]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

Huh, who had a broken foot?

Uh didnt Conor just say he did?

[bballshawn24]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

I dont know if you can say 2 was clear.

I gotta watch it again but I remember conor winning the first 3 minutes and Nate dominating the last 2 minutes of it

I think the "Diaz Was Robbed" talk is silly. People act like Conor didnt drop Nate multiple times. It was a super close fight. Two rounds were clear IMO, one round was a toss up

5 was closest to a toss up, and nate sealed it in the last seconds.

Conor almost was finished in round 2. Took alot of shots too.

[aholbert32]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

Trash decision

Shoot it shouldve been a decision. You told me Nate was going to destroy him.

It was a close fight. I could see it a draw. I could see it Nate 3-2. I saw it Conor 3-2.

[The JareBear]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

Man I REALLY want a post fight conference

[aholbert32]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

I dont know if you can say 2 was clear.

I gotta watch it again but I remember conor winning the first 3 minutes and Nate dominating the last 2 minutes of it

I think the "Diaz Was Robbed" talk is silly. People act like Conor didnt drop Nate multiple times. It was a super close fight. Two rounds were clear IMO, one round was a toss up

Conor dropped Nate in the 2nd too.

[redsox4evur]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

Yea JB. You're right. It's an easy 2 rounds for each and then the 2nd. And I would be inclined to call that round a draw.

[mestevo]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

I'd say he lost 80% of the clinch battle and that's being generous to Mac.

Which is enough, and then depends on the rounds he won/lost them in.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

[The JareBear]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

Conor stuffed every takedown except one, right? Doesnt that make you the more effective wrestler?

Honest question, not being rhetorical, I dunno how that stuff is scored

[Yaari]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

Uh didnt Conor just say he did?

Maybe but I switched off, so I missed anything about that

[aholbert32]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

Conor stuffed every takedown except one, right? Doesnt that make you the more effective wrestler?

Honest question, not being rhetorical, I dunno how that stuff is scored

It does. You should be given a small amount of credit for that with the judges.

[bballshawn24]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

Shoot it shouldve been a decision. You told me Nate was going to destroy him.

It was a close fight. I could see it a draw. I could see it Nate 3-2. I saw it Conor 3-2.

conor had better heart than last time.

[aholbert32]

Re: UFC 202: Diaz vs McGregor II (Aug. 20th)

conor had better heart than last time.

LOL. What does that mean?

I always laugh at the Diazs and Diaz fans. If you dont step in the cage and stand in front of them and bang....you dont have heart.

Lets ignore the large amount of damage that Conor put on Nate though.