WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TripleCrown9
    Keep the Faith
    • May 2010
    • 23706

    #31
    Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

    Originally posted by Amoo316
    I'm just curious if this came from an Arkansas fan?

    (If you don't follow the CFB forum just ignore this comment.)
    Lol I said lock, not "home run if true". I just heard that Jericho came back to start a feud with Ziggler. Something along the lines of "I'm the original show-off", etc, etc. That could have just been a rumor though.
    Boston Red Sox
    1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
    9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

    Comment

    • wwefan
      Pro
      • Feb 2013
      • 536

      #32
      Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

      I am pretty sure Ziggler will cash in on Swagger at Mania if he does not cash in at Mania it will probably be on a normal show.

      Comment

      • philliesfan136
        MVP
        • Feb 2011
        • 4263

        #33
        Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

        WM records:

        From BleacherReport.com, your destination for the latest news on your teams and topics in sports.
        Things Wrong With Madden Doc

        Comment

        • savoie2006
          R.I.P 2KHockey 2000-2011
          • Sep 2006
          • 4657

          #34
          Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

          Spoiler
          http://rateyourmusic.com/collection/Savoie12/visual/

          Comment

          • Streets
            Supreme
            • Aug 2004
            • 5787

            #35
            Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

            Mania is shaping up to look pretty nice with a stacked card throughout. If we get a card like this I definately won't complain:

            The Rock vs. John Cena (WWE Title)

            Undertaker vs. CM Punk

            Triple H vs. Brock Lesnar (Hell in a Cell)

            Dolph Ziggler vs. Alberto Del Rio (MITB Cash-in)

            Alberto Del Rio vs. Jack Swagger (World Title)

            The Shield vs. Randy Orton, Sheamus, The Big Show

            Ryback vs. Mark Henry

            Chris Jericho vs. Dolph Ziggler

            Kane vs. Daniel Bryan (Winner is the Tag Team Champions; though really I don't think they should break them up)

            Pre-Show: Miz vs. Wade Barrett (battle of the Z list movie stars)

            Comment

            • LakerFan56
              Rookie
              • Feb 2013
              • 415

              #36
              Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

              CM Punk vs Undertaker is the most intriguing match. If this streak was ever going to end, CM Punk would make the most sense to be the one who ends it. He could feud with Cena for the title after.

              Comment

              • 55
                Banned
                • Mar 2006
                • 20857

                #37
                Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                Card updated in the first post and I gave the REAL main event the top billing.

                Comment

                • JazzMan
                  SOLDIER, First Class...
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 13547

                  #38
                  Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                  What I would do, depending on Undertaker's health and fitness next year, is have Punk beat Undertaker at 'Mania this year. Then say that 'Taker has retired and all of that.

                  Punk goes on to have another strong year, gets the WWE Championship back, and by next year's Royal Rumble, he claims he is the Best ever.

                  Then 'Taker makes an unexpected return at the Rumble, winning it, and getting another shot at Punk at 'Mania. Have 'Taker beat Punk in Taker/Punk II, win the title, get redemption, and legitimately retire as WWE Champion.
                  Twitter: @TyroneisMaximus
                  PSN: JazzMan_OS

                  Green Bay Packers
                  Utah Jazz
                  Nebraska Cornhuskers

                  Dibs: AJ Lee

                  Comment

                  • 55
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 20857

                    #39
                    Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                    Nobody is ever going to retire with the title unless there is another Edge type situation.

                    You should always go out on your back in pro wrestling.

                    Comment

                    • JazzMan
                      SOLDIER, First Class...
                      • Feb 2012
                      • 13547

                      #40
                      Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                      Originally posted by 55
                      Nobody is ever going to retire with the title unless there is another Edge type situation.

                      You should always go out on your back in pro wrestling.
                      I agree, but I would make the exception for 'Taker.

                      In my mind, the best wrestler of all-time.
                      Twitter: @TyroneisMaximus
                      PSN: JazzMan_OS

                      Green Bay Packers
                      Utah Jazz
                      Nebraska Cornhuskers

                      Dibs: AJ Lee

                      Comment

                      • TheMatrix31
                        RF
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 52927

                        #41
                        Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                        Taker has to go out on his back. Definitely. But, as I said in the other thread we're talking about this, it doesn't have to be at Wrestlemania. Taker can beat Punk at Wrestlemania, and then lose at Summerslam or maybe Survivor Series (full circle) to someone to call it a career.

                        Comment

                        • DJ
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Apr 2003
                          • 17756

                          #42
                          Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                          Originally posted by TheMatrix31
                          Taker has to go out on his back. Definitely. But, as I said in the other thread we're talking about this, it doesn't have to be at Wrestlemania. Taker can beat Punk at Wrestlemania, and then lose at Summerslam or maybe Survivor Series (full circle) to someone to call it a career.
                          See, I think he has to lose at WM; he does that people will be shocked and they'll know it's the end for Taker since the streak is the only reason he continues to wrestle.
                          Currently Playing:
                          MLB The Show 25 (PS5)

                          Comment

                          • JazzMan
                            SOLDIER, First Class...
                            • Feb 2012
                            • 13547

                            #43
                            Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                            Originally posted by DJ
                            See, I think he has to lose at WM; he does that people will be shocked and they'll know it's the end for Taker since the streak is the only reason he continues to wrestle.
                            I agree. Why extend the streak and give people false hope that he's coming back? Because one day, he won't come back. As great as it would be for 'Taker to retire undefeated at 'Mania, it wouldn't be good for his legacy. He should be remembered as more than just the guy who was undefeated at Wrestlemania. Makes him sound like he had no other notable accomplishments in his career, which is entirely inaccurate.
                            Twitter: @TyroneisMaximus
                            PSN: JazzMan_OS

                            Green Bay Packers
                            Utah Jazz
                            Nebraska Cornhuskers

                            Dibs: AJ Lee

                            Comment

                            • Hooe
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Aug 2002
                              • 21555

                              #44
                              Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                              Originally posted by DJ
                              See, I think he has to lose at WM; he does that people will be shocked and they'll know it's the end for Taker since the streak is the only reason he continues to wrestle.
                              See, I think the WWE could get mileage out of Undertaker even if he's done wrestling and they don't "end" him with a loss.

                              For example, they could every once in a while just have the gong go off, lights out, something strange happens, lights up, previously-normal event is swerved. The Undertaker lives on as a spiritual figure of sorts, even though he's done wrestling. (note: the quality of this idea is debatable, just a quick example)

                              I suppose that doing something to that end doesn't necessitate that he keeps the streak, but Taker has always had a bit of a mystic and legendary quality to his character; keeping the streak in tact only reinforces that. It'd also keep up a bit of a Jordan-esque image for him; any day, he might come back, regardless how realistic the scenario actually is.

                              If Taker were to lose the streak, I think it has to be to John Cena or CM Punk, and more likely Cena. Either way, no one else.

                              Comment

                              • TripleCrown9
                                Keep the Faith
                                • May 2010
                                • 23706

                                #45
                                Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)

                                Originally posted by CM Hooe
                                See, I think the WWE could get mileage out of Undertaker even if he's done wrestling and they don't "end" him with a loss.

                                For example, they could every once in a while just have the gong go off, lights out, something strange happens, lights up, previously-normal event is swerved. The Undertaker lives on as a spiritual figure of sorts, even though he's done wrestling. (note: the quality of this idea is debatable, just a quick example)

                                I suppose that doing something to that end doesn't necessitate that he keeps the streak, but Taker has always had a bit of a mystic and legendary quality to his character; keeping the streak in tact only reinforces that. It'd also keep up a bit of a Jordan-esque image for him; any day, he might come back, regardless how realistic the scenario actually is.

                                If Taker were to lose the streak, I think it has to be to John Cena or CM Punk, and more likely Cena. Either way, no one else.
                                I like the idea of shutting the lights off and sounding the gong randomly. As long as it doesn't happen too often. Like say there's a #1 Contenders Match. For an example, let's say Ziggler and Cena. The match is going great, everyone's pumped up, then the lights go off, the gong sounds, lights back on, and both guys are face down in the ring. No Taker or anything, just the aesthetics. Let people speculate, it does down. Then randomly 6 or 7 months later, let it happen again. Just keep that up at random times, until one night he's actually there. Then go back to no appearances randomly.
                                Boston Red Sox
                                1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
                                9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

                                Comment

                                Working...