WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
SpoilerAccording to PWInsider.com, following his return to WWE at a house show event last weekend in Waco, TX, the TV return of The Undertaker is said to be imminent, and could happen as quickly as the Old School edition of Raw next week.
The rumored match between Undertaker and CM Punk at WrestleMania will indeed take place, and now the creative team is working quickly to put together a program for the two stars with only 5 weeks until 'Mania. CM Punk cutting the promo about being above all other superstars and God was intended to get the ball rolling on the feud.Comment
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
Mania is shaping up to look pretty nice with a stacked card throughout. If we get a card like this I definately won't complain:
The Rock vs. John Cena (WWE Title)
Undertaker vs. CM Punk
Triple H vs. Brock Lesnar (Hell in a Cell)
Dolph Ziggler vs. Alberto Del Rio (MITB Cash-in)
Alberto Del Rio vs. Jack Swagger (World Title)
The Shield vs. Randy Orton, Sheamus, The Big Show
Ryback vs. Mark Henry
Chris Jericho vs. Dolph Ziggler
Kane vs. Daniel Bryan (Winner is the Tag Team Champions; though really I don't think they should break them up)
Pre-Show: Miz vs. Wade Barrett (battle of the Z list movie stars)Comment
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
CM Punk vs Undertaker is the most intriguing match. If this streak was ever going to end, CM Punk would make the most sense to be the one who ends it. He could feud with Cena for the title after.Comment
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
What I would do, depending on Undertaker's health and fitness next year, is have Punk beat Undertaker at 'Mania this year. Then say that 'Taker has retired and all of that.
Punk goes on to have another strong year, gets the WWE Championship back, and by next year's Royal Rumble, he claims he is the Best ever.
Then 'Taker makes an unexpected return at the Rumble, winning it, and getting another shot at Punk at 'Mania. Have 'Taker beat Punk in Taker/Punk II, win the title, get redemption, and legitimately retire as WWE Champion.Twitter: @TyroneisMaximus
PSN: JazzMan_OS
Green Bay Packers
Utah Jazz
Nebraska Cornhuskers
Dibs: AJ LeeComment
-
Twitter: @TyroneisMaximus
PSN: JazzMan_OS
Green Bay Packers
Utah Jazz
Nebraska Cornhuskers
Dibs: AJ LeeComment
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
Taker has to go out on his back. Definitely. But, as I said in the other thread we're talking about this, it doesn't have to be at Wrestlemania. Taker can beat Punk at Wrestlemania, and then lose at Summerslam or maybe Survivor Series (full circle) to someone to call it a career.Comment
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
Taker has to go out on his back. Definitely. But, as I said in the other thread we're talking about this, it doesn't have to be at Wrestlemania. Taker can beat Punk at Wrestlemania, and then lose at Summerslam or maybe Survivor Series (full circle) to someone to call it a career.Currently Playing:
MLB The Show 25 (PS5)Comment
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
I agree. Why extend the streak and give people false hope that he's coming back? Because one day, he won't come back. As great as it would be for 'Taker to retire undefeated at 'Mania, it wouldn't be good for his legacy. He should be remembered as more than just the guy who was undefeated at Wrestlemania. Makes him sound like he had no other notable accomplishments in his career, which is entirely inaccurate.Twitter: @TyroneisMaximus
PSN: JazzMan_OS
Green Bay Packers
Utah Jazz
Nebraska Cornhuskers
Dibs: AJ LeeComment
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
For example, they could every once in a while just have the gong go off, lights out, something strange happens, lights up, previously-normal event is swerved. The Undertaker lives on as a spiritual figure of sorts, even though he's done wrestling. (note: the quality of this idea is debatable, just a quick example)
I suppose that doing something to that end doesn't necessitate that he keeps the streak, but Taker has always had a bit of a mystic and legendary quality to his character; keeping the streak in tact only reinforces that. It'd also keep up a bit of a Jordan-esque image for him; any day, he might come back, regardless how realistic the scenario actually is.
If Taker were to lose the streak, I think it has to be to John Cena or CM Punk, and more likely Cena. Either way, no one else.Comment
-
Re: WrestleMania 29 - (4/7/13)
See, I think the WWE could get mileage out of Undertaker even if he's done wrestling and they don't "end" him with a loss.
For example, they could every once in a while just have the gong go off, lights out, something strange happens, lights up, previously-normal event is swerved. The Undertaker lives on as a spiritual figure of sorts, even though he's done wrestling. (note: the quality of this idea is debatable, just a quick example)
I suppose that doing something to that end doesn't necessitate that he keeps the streak, but Taker has always had a bit of a mystic and legendary quality to his character; keeping the streak in tact only reinforces that. It'd also keep up a bit of a Jordan-esque image for him; any day, he might come back, regardless how realistic the scenario actually is.
If Taker were to lose the streak, I think it has to be to John Cena or CM Punk, and more likely Cena. Either way, no one else.Boston Red Sox
1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34
Comment
Comment