I will always be a subscriber to the Network. I absolutely love it, and it's a daily watch for me. I love being able to pull up whatever I want, whenever I want. It's perfect to try and educate my wife, who is a new WWE fan that's interested in seeing the past stuff. And I have also begun my journey of watching everything in chronological order, which I am absolutely loving! Currently at Wrestlemania VIII. The Network for me is worth FAR more than the 9.99 a month, so I'm very happy to keep it. I use it more than I do Netflix.
WWE Netflix/Peacock/ESPN Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
I will always be a subscriber to the Network. I absolutely love it, and it's a daily watch for me. I love being able to pull up whatever I want, whenever I want. It's perfect to try and educate my wife, who is a new WWE fan that's interested in seeing the past stuff. And I have also begun my journey of watching everything in chronological order, which I am absolutely loving! Currently at Wrestlemania VIII. The Network for me is worth FAR more than the 9.99 a month, so I'm very happy to keep it. I use it more than I do Netflix. -
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Can you change the video quality of the video you're watching? EX-Is it like youtube where you can chose between 720p,480p,360p and so on.
(Obviously I'd prefer the highest quality,but if it will eat up my bandwidth,would be nice to have option like youtube to watch at a lower quality)Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
I like watching old matches because of chairshots to the head. Something about it manComment
-
-
Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Can you change the video quality of the video you're watching? EX-Is it like youtube where you can chose between 720p,480p,360p and so on.
(Obviously I'd prefer the highest quality,but if it will eat up my bandwidth,would be nice to have option like youtube to watch at a lower quality)Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Sent from my SCH-i705 using TapatalkOriginally posted by MoJust once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.Originally posted by MoYou underestimate my lazinessOriginally posted by Mo**** ya
...Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
I react the same way; it's hard to watch knowing what we do about head injuries.Currently Playing:
MLB The Show 25 (PS5)Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Sent from my SCH-i705 using TapatalkOriginally posted by MoJust once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.Originally posted by MoYou underestimate my lazinessOriginally posted by Mo**** ya
...Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
I'm fine with blood. The only reason they don't do blood is it's rated PG.
But the headshots are dangerous to the health if the wrestlers.
MICHIGAN WOLVERINES
1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1918 | 1923 | 1932 | 1933 | 1947 | 1948 | 1997 | 2023
MONTREAL CANADIENS
1916 | 1924 | 1930 | 1931 | 1944 | 1946 | 1953 | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959 | 1960 | 1965
1966 | 1968 | 1971 | 1973 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1986 | 1993
Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
It wouldn't be all the time though. Every once in a while, maybe how it was with Triple H vs Undertaker at WM 27.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
My problem with blood was that it was overdone and became a crutch.Comment
-
Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread
Blood is just as dangerous, if not more so, than chairshots to the head. That being said, blood should absolutely be used again - but only in the big/high profile matches and feuds that deserve it. We don't need people partying like Flair on Main Event... but a bloody WM match can be used to great effect.badComment
Comment