WWE Netflix/Peacock/ESPN Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • redsox4evur
    Hall Of Fame
    • Jul 2013
    • 18169

    #5791
    Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

    It's still bull**** that they don't have every episode of NXT on there.
    Follow me on Twitter

    Comment

    • reyes the roof
      Hall Of Fame
      • Mar 2009
      • 11526

      #5792
      Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by cima
      Lol not having those B shows on the Network doesn't make it a failure. I know at some point they were all A shows but Heat and Thunder aren't super important. Superstars I want just because we need some damn 80s/90s buildup. At the same time though, that **** is gonna be almost as hard to watch as 93-95 RAW so I can see why it's not high on their priority list when it's all squash matches. But the fact that they have every PPV, every RAW, every SD (2011 episodes have started), every Nitro, every SNME, every Clash of Champions, every ECW TV and pretty much every ECW PPV/event, and all the other stuff is awesome. Not to mention all of the original programming they have.

      Network is awesome and far from a failure. The Network is the only reason I'm even into wrestling in 2017. I said bye to that **** in 2004 and went 10 years without it, thought I was done for good. Didn't even care when The Rock and Brock Lesnar came back when they did. Now I've been lured back in and am probably never leaving again.
      I took a ten year break during the same time. Daniel Bryan got me back in to it, but there is no way I'd still be watching if I was having to shell out over $50 per month for a ppv.


      As for Superstars being hard to watch, I don't care how bad the matches are, I'll sit through it if Ventura/Vince or Gorilla/Heenan are on commentary. They're even better hearing them as an adult, I never picked up on a lot of the references they made when I was a kid

      Comment

      • King_B_Mack
        All Star
        • Jan 2009
        • 24450

        #5793
        Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by cima
        Lol not having those B shows on the Network doesn't make it a failure. I know at some point they were all A shows but Heat and Thunder aren't super important. Superstars I want just because we need some damn 80s/90s buildup. At the same time though, that **** is gonna be almost as hard to watch as 93-95 RAW so I can see why it's not high on their priority list when it's all squash matches. But the fact that they have every PPV, every RAW, every SD (2011 episodes have started), every Nitro, every SNME, every Clash of Champions, every ECW TV and pretty much every ECW PPV/event, and all the other stuff is awesome. Not to mention all of the original programming they have.



        Network is awesome and far from a failure. The Network is the only reason I'm even into wrestling in 2017. I said bye to that **** in 2004 and went 10 years without it, thought I was done for good. Didn't even care when The Rock and Brock Lesnar came back when they did. Now I've been lured back in and am probably never leaving again.


        So you just going to ignore the joking nature of my post? You going to ignore me agreeing with the OP that it was a success? Obviously the Network is a success for all the reasons you listed and the fact that it's made it 3 years so far without going under. I've been fighting this Heat, Thunder, Superstars, NXT fight in here for a while now and will continue to do so until they get it on the network.

        It's a success for sure but the fact that it's been 3 years and those shows STILL don't have a single episode is unacceptable. The fact that they STILL don't have all of NXT is unacceptable. I'm happy with what I'm getting for my 9.99 a month but I'm missing a lot of storyline points as I try to watch shows because of these missing shows.


        Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

        Comment

        • SPTO
          binging
          • Feb 2003
          • 68046

          #5794
          Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by redsox4evur
          It's still bull**** that they don't have every episode of NXT on there.
          Blame it on the WWE teaming up with Hulu when NXT started.
          Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

          "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

          Comment

          • redsox4evur
            Hall Of Fame
            • Jul 2013
            • 18169

            #5795
            Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by SPTO
            Blame it on the WWE teaming up with Hulu when NXT started.
            Hasn't stopped them from adding recent Raws and Smackdowns 30 days after they air. So no I'm not blaming it on the Hulu deal. This probably on WWE and their laziness.
            Follow me on Twitter

            Comment

            • IndianBird
              MVP
              • Nov 2004
              • 2909

              #5796
              Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by redsox4evur
              Hasn't stopped them from adding recent Raws and Smackdowns 30 days after they air. So no I'm not blaming it on the Hulu deal. This probably on WWE and their laziness.


              Cmon dude.

              Laziness?


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              I'm a Vince McMahon Guy!

              On, On, On, To Victory!!

              Gamertag: stewgilligan

              Comment

              • redsox4evur
                Hall Of Fame
                • Jul 2013
                • 18169

                #5797
                Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by IndianBird
                Cmon dude.

                Laziness?


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                There only like 100 episodes needed to be uploaded if you include the competition seasons. But only like 20ish if you don't. So give me another reason why they haven't uploaded it.


                Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
                Follow me on Twitter

                Comment

                • PeoplesChampGB
                  All Star
                  • May 2012
                  • 6005

                  #5798
                  Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                  I agree. We need Superstars and WCW Saturday Night pronto. Late 80's early 90's buildup to PPVs is a must have. I also think they should add some more house show cards from the early 90's. I know what they have isn't all of them.
                  NFL- Green Bay Packers
                  NCAA- Florida State Seminoles
                  NHL- Carolina Hurricanes

                  Comment

                  • BDKiiing
                    Best in the World
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 9334

                    #5799
                    Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                    I remember actually getting up early before class the day the Network went live and signing up right away. Good times.

                    But really, they need every NXT, FCW, and Velocity episode uploaded.
                    St. Louis Cardinals | Milwaukee Bucks | Los Angeles Rams
                    UWW | UWGB | Duke
                    AEW

                    Comment

                    • TheShizNo1
                      Asst 2 the Comm Manager
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 26341

                      #5800
                      Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                      I'm at July in 2000 watching the WWF shows in chronological order.

                      It's crazy to think that wrestling just keeps getting better from here; RA, brand split, etc

                      I wonder if Shane could make it as a full time wrestler. Dude was entertaining every time he was on the screen whether in the ring or on a mic.

                      We didn't appreciate the stooges, man. Briscoe and Patterson were hilarious especially when JR and King were on commentary.

                      JR is my goat as far as commentary; dude made me feel like he would be legitimately angry or ecstatic with certain events/wrestlers.

                      Vince has my vote for greatest WWE heel of all time. HHH is a close second.

                      I hate Right to Censor. Hate. Real *** hate.

                      Forgot how funny E&C were.

                      Too Cool was dumb over. When I see them I think of Enzo and Cass.

                      I wish we could have chair shots to the head without the risk of injury.

                      I never gave Foley enough credit for his mic work, especially when he's pissed/serious.

                      Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
                      Last edited by TheShizNo1; 02-26-2017, 03:24 PM.
                      Originally posted by Mo
                      Just once I'd like to be the one they call a jerk off.
                      Originally posted by Mo
                      You underestimate my laziness
                      Originally posted by Mo
                      **** ya


                      ...

                      Comment

                      • reyes the roof
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 11526

                        #5801
                        Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by TheShizNo1
                        JR is my goat as far as commentary; dude made me feel like he would be legitimately angry or ecstatic with certain events/wrestlers.
                        For me, it just doesn't get any better than JR calling HHH a son of a b****





                        I really liked his pre WWE stuff to, loved how he would talk about guys college backgrounds or how Mike Rotundo was a punt pass kick finalist as an 8 year old.

                        Comment

                        • Majingir
                          Moderator
                          • Apr 2005
                          • 47682

                          #5802
                          Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                          Obviously nobody can replicate JR, but WWE should have commentary tryouts or something. Maybe just me, but I'd rather listen to an interesting sounding person even if they make mistakes or go off topic, than a boring sounding one who is straight to the point on their commentary.

                          Comment

                          • Aggies7
                            All Star
                            • Jan 2005
                            • 9495

                            #5803
                            Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by Majingir
                            Obviously nobody can replicate JR, but WWE should have commentary tryouts or something. Maybe just me, but I'd rather listen to an interesting sounding person even if they make mistakes or go off topic, than a boring sounding one who is straight to the point on their commentary.


                            Yes the in ring action has to be good, but I truly believe an announcer can carry a match and make it. JR was one of those guys for me.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
                            Texas A&M Aggies
                            Denver Broncos

                            Colorado Avalanche
                            Colorado Rockies

                            Comment

                            • reyes the roof
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 11526

                              #5804
                              Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by Aggies7
                              Yes the in ring action has to be good, but I truly believe an announcer can carry a match and make it. JR was one of those guys for me.


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
                              Commentary can definitely make a match for me. My favorite match of all time is Hogan vs Savage at WM 5 and a big part of it is because of Monsoon and Ventura's commentary

                              Comment

                              • dubcity
                                Hall Of Fame
                                • May 2012
                                • 17876

                                #5805
                                Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by Majingir
                                Obviously nobody can replicate JR, but WWE should have commentary tryouts or something. Maybe just me, but I'd rather listen to an interesting sounding person even if they make mistakes or go off topic, than a boring sounding one who is straight to the point on their commentary.
                                It's funny, if you listen to Michael Cole back when he first took over for JR ('99), he had that same JR level of excitement in his voice. Not saying he was ever on JR's level, but there was a time when Cole was much better than how he's been for the last decade +.
                                Last edited by dubcity; 02-26-2017, 08:07 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...