Sorry for the double post, but hope this will save some time. I judge the merits of a persons critiques based on the merit of their argument, not their history. I don't care if a person never played a down of football in their life, if they argue that some aspect is unrealistic and subpar and can intelligently and effectively demonstrate that, then they have credibility.
If they simply say "Madden is trash" and maybe offer vague reasons as to why I disregard their input, regardless of their background.
Based on your posts it appears as if two people disagree on the quality of the game you will side with the person that has NFL experience. I strongly disagree with that.
Further, given your statements I'd like to ask what business OS has reviewing Madden. What NFL team or position with EA has the reviewer had? I can't seem to find that info. And according to you, if he has neither it would be extremely arrogant of him to evaluate the dev team's performance right?
Finally, if that is your position I hope you accept that it must go both ways. If I can't criticize the performance of the devs because I'm not qualified to do so it stands to reason that I likewise cannot praise them right?
Comment