All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stacks
    Rookie
    • Dec 2007
    • 302

    #826
    Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

    Is it true that we can edit player ratings mid-franchise? I thought that they confirmed that feature this year?
    PSN: SteelStacks

    Comment

    • hiuhyoi
      Rookie
      • Jun 2009
      • 47

      #827
      Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

      Originally posted by SoHi23
      And how chaz schillens is still a 69 overall despite his breakout season last year.
      Wow 15 catches from 32 passes; what a breakout!

      Comment

      • JeriousNorwood
        Pro
        • Apr 2009
        • 570

        #828
        Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

        Originally posted by hiuhyoi
        Wow 15 catches from 32 passes; what a breakout!
        ROFL. So true.

        Comment

        • kcarr
          MVP
          • Sep 2008
          • 2787

          #829
          Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

          Originally posted by hiuhyoi
          Wow 15 catches from 32 passes; what a breakout!
          well, everything is relative. When you compare that with the ineptitude that normally surrounds the raiders that probably looks better than average.

          Comment

          • jayohehn
            Rookie
            • Jul 2009
            • 74

            #830
            Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

            What team does everyone want to see released next?

            Comment

            • JeriousNorwood
              Pro
              • Apr 2009
              • 570

              #831
              Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

              Does anyone think Vince Young's toughness rating of 85 is too high? Sure, he might have decent physical toughness, but his mental toughness should bring that number down a lot.

              Comment

              • LBzrule
                Hall Of Fame
                • Jul 2002
                • 13085

                #832
                Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

                Originally posted by jayohehn
                What team does everyone want to see released next?
                Visit ESPN for live scores, highlights and sports news. Stream exclusive games on ESPN and play fantasy sports.


                Titans are up

                Comment

                • Dcooks
                  Banned
                  • May 2009
                  • 215

                  #833
                  Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

                  These ratings make little to no sense. ronde barber 79 speed. troy polomalu 93 speed 95 acc. cmon.laron landry ran a 4.38 just like adrian peterson,but he only has 91 speed. AP 95. wtf. LT 91 speed. So your telling me Troy polomalu is the same speed as ed reed and faster than LT, and LArry Fitz. get outta here with the speed. the rest of the rating categories look very good and reasonable. but this speed needs to be adjusted for certain players big time. No Comment.

                  Comment

                  • BroMontana82
                    Support Sim
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 2225

                    #834
                    Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

                    titans have a ton of good TE's but some pretty bad WR's ha

                    Comment

                    • BroMontana82
                      Support Sim
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 2225

                      #835
                      Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

                      Originally posted by Dcooks
                      These ratings make little to no sense. ronde barber 79 speed. troy polomalu 93 speed 95 acc. cmon.laron landry ran a 4.38 just like adrian peterson,but he only has 91 speed. AP 95. wtf. LT 91 speed. So your telling me Troy polomalu is the same speed as ed reed and faster than LT, and LArry Fitz. get outta here with the speed. the rest of the rating categories look very good and reasonable. but this speed needs to be adjusted for certain players big time. No Comment.
                      vince young with an 85 speed rating? what was his 40 time? does this make sense? he's not that fast? correct me of if im wrong but it seems a little high to me i dunno.

                      Comment

                      • JeriousNorwood
                        Pro
                        • Apr 2009
                        • 570

                        #836
                        Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

                        Originally posted by Dcooks
                        These ratings make little to no sense. ronde barber 79 speed. troy polomalu 93 speed 95 acc. cmon.laron landry ran a 4.38 just like adrian peterson,but he only has 91 speed. AP 95. wtf. LT 91 speed. So your telling me Troy polomalu is the same speed as ed reed and faster than LT, and LArry Fitz. get outta here with the speed. the rest of the rating categories look very good and reasonable. but this speed needs to be adjusted for certain players big time. No Comment.
                        It's because people play faster/slower than their forty times. How many freaking times does it need to be stated that your forty time does not equal your speed rating in Madden?

                        Comment

                        • Smoke316
                          Pro
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 688

                          #837
                          Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

                          Originally posted by LBzrule
                          Very fair considering the new ratings system. CJ is going to be a problem this year. looking foward to using Jarod Cook in the passing game as well. Also there is room for improvement for my franchise in some spots (MLB) so i cant wait!!!
                          DIE HARD Knicks, Yankees, and Titans fan...
                          DIE HARD Madden , NBA 2k Fan..
                          Brooklyn STAND UP!!

                          Modest in Speech..Superior in Action

                          Hit me on Twitter - SeanSemps

                          Comment

                          • BroMontana82
                            Support Sim
                            • Nov 2004
                            • 2225

                            #838
                            Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

                            Originally posted by JeriousNorwood
                            It's because people play faster/slower than their forty times. How many freaking times does it need to be stated that your forty time does not equal your speed rating in Madden?
                            i thought the devs stated many times that players speeds will equal real life 40 times so that in the game, running 10 yards will be equivalent to the time it takes to running 10 in real life? it might not affect individual player ratings but it seems to be the basis behind their ratings maybe?

                            Comment

                            • HealyMonster
                              Titans Era has begun.
                              • Aug 2002
                              • 5992

                              #839
                              Re: All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

                              Originally posted by Smoke316
                              Very fair considering the new ratings system. CJ is going to be a problem this year. looking foward to using Jarod Cook in the passing game as well. Also there is room for improvement for my franchise in some spots (MLB) so i cant wait!!!
                              yeah, even though they "revamped" the ratings, there are some things that make no sense. Like if you look Tulloch and fowler in real life compete for the starting job, they shouldn't be 10 points difference between them.

                              also some of the rating make no sense. Im not saying the ratings are off as I dont know how they play yet but some of the numbers look random to me or they are agenda driven. I dont know how they rate a 3rd string rookie TE at 75 and Alge crumpler a 77.

                              Comment

                              • WildFireXXI
                                Banned
                                • Jul 2009
                                • 145

                                #840
                                Re: Here ya go Ian...

                                Originally posted by LBzrule
                                I wonder what position skill ratings took him up to 77. To me, I'd pay more attention to the position skill ratings than anything. Also I posted in the other thread if Hall is going up to a 77 ovr then Fabian Washington and Dominique Foxworth should go up too. But I'd be more concerned with position skill ratings. I don't care if Hall is higher ovr as long as some of their position skill ratings are better than his.
                                I'm a Ravens fan, but Washington is bad lol.

                                Comment

                                Working...