-
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
Go to the TSN.CA main page. The first video on the right hand side will have the segment i'm talking about. I will agree with you that it was mostly his fault but not 100%
Anywho, it looked like Manziel was pulled in the 2nd half here's his final stats from tonight:
11/20 for 104 yards and 4 INTs
Pretty damn ugly....Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
I want that cap Vikings DB Sendejo has.
Make Football Violent Again
also, his modified helmet so that he is always leading with the facemask is awesome lolOSFM23 - Building Better Baseball - OSFM23
A Work in ProgressComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
Yup nothing like saying you don't know how to tackle.
Worked out real well for Shazier.badComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
So ummmm....WTF is doing these busts for the HOF?
Because they look nothing like the person they’re supposed to be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
Look on the bright side, at least it's not like the left pic : (left is before, right is after everyone ripped the guy making the bust and he redid it)
Don't these things get approved beforehand? And what goes through people's heads while making it, clearly not looking like the person it's supposed to be like?Comment
-
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
Looks like Warren Moon. Did TO get a bust or is the HoF going to be petty bitches on that too lol.Comment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
The HOF has been known for having busts that have looked BAAAD but this year is off the charts in the suckitude of it all.
They need to do what WWE has done with their statues that they've commissioned in recent years where they have the person do a mold of their face and the artist can work from there.Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
Per ProFootballTalk:
More than a decade ago, an injury to receiver Terrell Owens forced a change to the rules of the NFL. Now, an insult to T.O. could force a change to the rules of the HOF.
Per multiple sources, the Hall of Fame currently is considering a requirement that candidates for enshrinement commit to showing up for the Hall of Fame enshrinement ceremony before the selection committee makes its final choices.
As one source explained it, the issue became a hot topic on Friday in Canton. During the annual Ray Nitschke luncheon, attended only by members of the Hall of Fame, most strongly disagreed with Terrell Owens’ decision to boycott the weekend’s festivities. Some supported Owens. Most if not all agreed that it is important to stop Owens’ boycott of the ceremony from becoming a trend.
The Hall of Famers want advance screening of the candidates along with a commitment that they will show up. The plan, as another source put it, would consist of having the 25 semifinalists sign an agreement that they would show up if selected. It’s currently believed that the adjustment to the procedures is virtually certain to happen.
Three obvious questions arise. First, what happens if the semifinalist refuses to sign the document? Presumably, the person automatically would not become one of the 15 finalists, thereby preventing the members of the selection committee from voting the candidate in.
Second, what happens if the person signs the document, wins enshrinement, and then doesn’t show up? Would the Hall of Famer be replaced by an alternate, or would the bronze bust still be added to the Hall of Fame in the new enshrinee’s absence?
Third, and perhaps most importantly, is the Hall of Fame willing to change its bylaws to permit consideration for induction to stray beyond events and dynamics unrelated to the candidate’s football career? If an inclination to not attend the ceremony becomes a factor in keeping someone out of Canton, what about other things that are supposedly off limits when it comes to screening Hall of Famers?
The best approach could be to regard the T.O. situation as a once-in-318 aberration and to continue with the same rules that otherwise would have been applied. Indeed, Owens didn’t show up, but he’s still a Hall of Famer. It wouldn’t be fair to any other potential Hall of Famer to apply a different set of rules.
It also would be wrong to ignore Owens’ overriding point: He was indeed passed over, not once but twice, for reasons unrelated to his accomplishments. The fact that Owens and Randy Moss generally are regarded as the second- and third-, or third- and second-, best receivers of all time behind Jerry Rice coupled with the fact that Moss got in on the first try proves that Owens also should have gotten in on the first try.
So instead of creating a litmus test that violates the letter and spirit of the Hall of Fame’s bylaws for enshrinement, the current members of the Hall of Fame should instead recognize the merit of T.O.’s argument and consider revamping the selection process to ensure that another first-ballot Hall of Famer isn’t made to wait for reasons other than the things he did on the field.#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
What ****in bull****, man.
Sent from my SM-T807V using Operation Sports mobile appOriginally posted by MoOriginally posted by MoOriginally posted by MoComment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
The Shield is so damn sensitive.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: NFL Off Topic
BANG! ZOOM! POW!
So tired of Ray Lewis' act.
And can someone explain to me why it's taking so long for Cliff Branch and Joe Klecko to get in? Branch is more deserving than TO, IMO.
https://howtheyplay.com/team-sports/...l-Hall-of-FameComment
Comment