In theory, yes...but did the offense really do that last year? They were terrible at sustaining drives. Just getting a first down was a chore at times. They had so many three-and-outs it was almost incomprehensible. I believe in one game they had NINE three-and-outs in a row. IMO, the offense over-taxed their defense by constantly putting them on the field. I think the defense will fare much better this year. They will have opportunities to play with a lead and be more aggressive. They won't have to feel like if they give up a couple of TD's early, the game is over.
Official Denver Broncos Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Official Denver Broncos Thread
In theory, yes...but did the offense really do that last year? They were terrible at sustaining drives. Just getting a first down was a chore at times. They had so many three-and-outs it was almost incomprehensible. I believe in one game they had NINE three-and-outs in a row. IMO, the offense over-taxed their defense by constantly putting them on the field. I think the defense will fare much better this year. They will have opportunities to play with a lead and be more aggressive. They won't have to feel like if they give up a couple of TD's early, the game is over. -
In theory, yes...but did the offense really do that last year? They were terrible at sustaining drives. Just getting a first down was a chore at times. They had so many three-and-outs it was almost incomprehensible. I believe in one game they had NINE three-and-outs in a row. IMO, the offense over-taxed their defense by constantly putting them on the field. I think the defense will fare much better this year. They will have opportunities to play with a lead and be more aggressive. They won't have to feel like if they give up a couple of TD's early, the game is over.
And I completely agree with being down 17+ isn't a death penalty anymore. I understand Tebow made some miraculous comebacks but they wouldn't be able to make up 17+ point deficits. With Peyton that is possible.
I will say I really hope we aren't down 17+ points but at least don't feel like its automatic game over.Texas A&M Aggies
Denver Broncos
Colorado Avalanche
Colorado RockiesComment
-
Re: Official Denver Broncos Thread
In theory, yes...but did the offense really do that last year? They were terrible at sustaining drives. Just getting a first down was a chore at times. They had so many three-and-outs it was almost incomprehensible. I believe in one game they had NINE three-and-outs in a row. IMO, the offense over-taxed their defense by constantly putting them on the field. I think the defense will fare much better this year. They will have opportunities to play with a lead and be more aggressive. They won't have to feel like if they give up a couple of TD's early, the game is over.
I agree. They really put a lot of pressure on the defense all year. I think this year will be better for them. Manning will move the ball, and the defense will feel better knowing the offense can put some points on the board.Comment
-
Texas A&M Aggies
Denver Broncos
Colorado Avalanche
Colorado RockiesComment
-
If that doesn't pan out I can see them just cutting him.Texas A&M Aggies
Denver Broncos
Colorado Avalanche
Colorado RockiesComment
-
Re: Official Denver Broncos Thread
I did hear that he took some reps with the first team today. I have waited and waited for that guy to turn into what he was drafted to be, but it just hasn't happened. If he makes the team, he's going to see spot duty at best behind McGahee and Hillman. The funny thing is, I think he'd do well catching passes out of the backfield from Manning. I just don't know if there will be room on the roster for a guy who has consistently under-performed, has injury issues every year, and has had off-field issues.
I agree...a trade would be nice. I believe he has a year left on his rookie contract. I can honestly say that I wouldn't miss him if he was gone. Based on his past production and history, I don't think the Broncos would either.Comment
-
Re: Official Denver Broncos Thread
I initially assumed him to be gone but after thinking about it a little more I believe he will get his last chance in Denver this year.
I think the Broncos want to make it work with him because of what the organization spent on him (much like with Ayers) but at this point the leash is short.Comment
-
I initially assumed him to be gone but after thinking about it a little more I believe he will get his last chance in Denver this year.
I think the Broncos want to make it work with him because of what the organization spent on him (much like with Ayers) but at this point the leash is short.
Just don't see him making the final roster. Which wouldn't hurt my feelings at all.Texas A&M Aggies
Denver Broncos
Colorado Avalanche
Colorado RockiesComment
-
Re: Official Denver Broncos Thread
It's really hard to say. Hillman will be the change-of-pace back. I don't know what Moreno's role would be other than just a back-up RB. Do they really want to spend that much money for a 3rd string back? Maybe the cap penalties are such that it just makes more sense to keep him rather than cut him. Trade him...
If I had to put money on whether or not he would make the team, I don't know which way I'd go. Where he was drafted and what he was expected to become plays a role, but I honestly don't think he's going to just explode in year four. RB's have a short shelf-life, and he's already spent his prime years.
Maybe...
He's got to have a very strong showing in preseason or I think he's gone.Comment
-
It's really hard to say. Hillman will be the change-of-pace back. I don't know what Moreno's role would be other than just a back-up RB. Do they really want to spend that much money for a 3rd string back? Maybe the cap penalties are such that it just makes more sense to keep him rather than cut him. Trade him...
If I had to put money on whether or not he would make the team, I don't know which way I'd go. Where he was drafted and what he was expected to become plays a role, but I honestly don't think he's going to just explode in year four. RB's have a short shelf-life, and he's already spent his prime years.
Maybe...
He's got to have a very strong showing in preseason or I think he's gone.
But you can't guarantee McGhee's health so it may not be a bad idea to keep Moreno around if there are no trade options.Texas A&M Aggies
Denver Broncos
Colorado Avalanche
Colorado RockiesComment
-
Re: Official Denver Broncos Thread
As compared to the last few years, it so refreshing to read the Post and hear about how Mannning is just so dominant. I can't wait to hear how he does in the scrimmage on Saturday. He'll carve up the 2's. I like to see him go against the 1's in the scrimmage.
Hopefully the time that Decker has to sit out will help get DT and Manning going as well.Comment
-
Re: Official Denver Broncos Thread
So long as Moreno can stay healthy, I see him being used as a RB on passing downs or as the change-of-pace back in case something happens to Hillman.
As I've illustrated in the past, Moreno is great in open space. He's like Reggie Bush in that regard. His problem is simply durability. The moment he goes down with a decent injury, I expect an injury settlement to come from it. At this point, nobody is going to trade for him knowing what kind of health he's had.Comment
Comment