Talladega is probably the easies to me. If I remember correctly, it was pretty much on the gas the entire race.
Nascar Thunder 2004-Tracks
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Darth_Dorn
Re: Nascar Thunder 2004-Tracks
Talladega is probably the easies to me. If I remember correctly, it was pretty much on the gas the entire race. -
Re: Nascar Thunder 2004-Tracks
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Darth_Dorn said:
Talladega is probably the easies to me. If I remember correctly, it was pretty much on the gas the entire race.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Talledega and Daytona are 2 tracks that the car should be able to run wide open, at least that's how i prefer the setup.Comment
-
Re: Nascar Thunder 2004-Tracks
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Darth_Dorn said:
Talladega is probably the easies to me. If I remember correctly, it was pretty much on the gas the entire race.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Talledega and Daytona are 2 tracks that the car should be able to run wide open, at least that's how i prefer the setup.Comment
-
Re: Nascar Thunder 2004-Tracks
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Darth_Dorn said:
Talladega is probably the easies to me. If I remember correctly, it was pretty much on the gas the entire race.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Talledega and Daytona are 2 tracks that the car should be able to run wide open, at least that's how i prefer the setup.Comment
-
Re: Nascar Thunder 2004-Tracks
The top 3 for me would have to be: Atlanta, Talladega, and Texas.
The worst 3 are: Louden, Rockingham, and Infineon.Comment
-
Re: Nascar Thunder 2004-Tracks
The top 3 for me would have to be: Atlanta, Talladega, and Texas.
The worst 3 are: Louden, Rockingham, and Infineon.Comment
-
Re: Nascar Thunder 2004-Tracks
The top 3 for me would have to be: Atlanta, Talladega, and Texas.
The worst 3 are: Louden, Rockingham, and Infineon.Comment
Comment