Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

[ODogg]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

No, that's normal. Around 400GB is usable.

THe PS4 hard disk formatted for windows is 476gb..

[spidertour02]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

I actually enjoy the fact that most of the free games have been Indie games, because it's doubtful I would have even heard of many of them, much less downloaded and played them.

IMO, the Indie games are more simplistic and "fun" focused, which is a nice change of pace from the AAA titles that are so focused on visuals.

THIS, so hard. PS+ has introduced me to some real gems that I wouldn't even have cared about. Just the other day, I finished up all the trophies in Mutant Mudds Deluxe on Vita.

Do you guys play the Pool game? Like to play some of you..... manoletp33 is my psn. I love the game...except at times slow.

I just got it last night, and man, do I suck at it!

[TheBadazz]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

I got pool too. I suck for now but I'll get better.

[ODogg]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

I got pool too. I suck for now but I'll get better.

Add me os_odogg

[mrclutch]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

That is if you kept your PS1, PS2 or PS3 (backward compatible).... but yea...Im only interested if this is like the PS plus with yearly membership ($50 or less) and you could play whatever games u like from PS1-PS3 with no time limit. I was so excited about PS Now because I skipped PS3 and went with 360. But now, with all these crazy pricing, NOT ANYMORE. I'll just buy PS3 then buy the old games i like. I have my PS2 and its still working..and i have the games i like in that machine.

Whoever thinks about this about renting a game for $4 for 4 hours is a FOOL. And if the pricing of rents will be the reason why PS Now will flop...i hope that FOOL(s) be fired and never work again in gaming industry.

Agree with you on the pricing. If they come up with a annual fee for all the games I might give it a shot but at the current pricing structure it's not for me.
However I don't see them having a yearly fee that is very reasonable but we'll see.

[mestevo]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Engadget tweeted out a post from their forums that they liked... it suggested a $150/year fee I believe for unlimited access.

[daniel77733]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Engadget tweeted out a post from their forums that they liked... it suggested a $150/year fee I believe for unlimited access.

(Not directed at you personally)

GTFO!!!!!!!!!! $150??? Are you kidding me??? No one is paying that especially when there's more PSN games than disc based games, only PS3 exclusives from Sony in Killzone 3 and Twisted Metal and in general, the entire games list is average at best.

Sorry but this WAS a great idea but thus far, it's been horribly implemented and I doubt that it's going to get any better.

If anything, Sony would be better off canning PS Now and do what EA is doing with EA Access. Being able to download and play all the Sony exclusives for a monthly/yearly fee would be great.

Oh well, whatever.

[TheBadazz]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Engadget tweeted out a post from their forums that they liked... it suggested a $150/year fee I believe for unlimited access.

Must be a joke!!

[dickey1331]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Basically $12 a month is bad? EA is $5 a month. If Sony can get good games then I see it being worth it.

I probably won't use it but it wouldn't be a scam.

[sbauer318]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

$150 isn't bad if they have a solid library.

[mestevo]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

The post in question: http://www.engadget.com/discuss/play...ook-like-1s9d/

[The Chef]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Basically $12 a month is bad? EA is $5 a month. If Sony can get good games then I see it being worth it.

I probably won't use it but it wouldn't be a scam.

For me it all comes down to whether they charge per month or all at once for the year. I know it's the same amount but it's a lot easier for me to swallow paying $12 a month and canceling if I end up not seeing the value over paying $150 up front and then not finding the value while being locked in. I know it all comes down to virtually the same price but I'd try it our for a month at $12 but wouldn't touch it if it required I pay $150 up front.

[sbauer318]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

(Not directed at you personally)



GTFO!!!!!!!!!! $150??? Are you kidding me??? No one is paying that especially when there's more PSN games than disc based games, only PS3 exclusives from Sony in Killzone 3 and Twisted Metal and in general, the entire games list is average at best.



Sorry but this WAS a great idea but thus far, it's been horribly implemented and I doubt that it's going to get any better.



If anything, Sony would be better off canning PS Now and do what EA is doing with EA Access. Being able to download and play all the Sony exclusives for a monthly/yearly fee would be great.



Oh well, whatever.

Umm what? Can it? Talk about going off the deep end. This library isn't going to be static. They will be adding more games.

[Dog]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

If it is $150 a year *on top* of PS+, I don't see myself being interested

[mgoblue]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Basically $12 a month is bad? EA is $5 a month. If Sony can get good games then I see it being worth it.

I probably won't use it but it wouldn't be a scam.

EA was 30 a year...150 is not worth it for only PS3 games....is PS Now ever including PS4 games? I'd want current gen stuff personally. I don't play much old stuff anymore