Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

[Flawless]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Don't you need the camera for head tracking?

Granted, you can find them cheaply, but for something that's pretty integral to the experience, you think it would be included. Seems like a surefire way to create unnecessary confusion.

[tjung0831]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

It's weird, it shows both Fox Sports Ohio's, but I'm doing the free trial now, and neither are anywhere to be found.

Same thing in St. Louis. I signed up because it shows FSMW available in the core slim package but when firing it up, I get no FSMW in my guide. That will probably be showstopper for me.

[BattleBornLV]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

They need to get Vue on the Roku then it will definitely be something I consider.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Flawless]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

https://twitter.com/PlayStationUK/status/709856133024980992

PlayStation VR requires the PlayStation Camera, which is available separately.

So stupid.

[Sandman42]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Sony probably has such a surplus of those cameras too. No idea why they wouldn't include them in the box, but I guess they were desperate to get under the $400 price point.

That's like if they sold the PS4 without a Dualshock in it.

[Flawless]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Yeah, I guess at the same time, it's a damn if you do, damn if don't. I'm sure owners of the PS4 camera would've been complaining, "Why isn't it $349?".

Still silly to me and because there weren't going to announce any bundles today, it kind comes across as a shady PR move.

[Knight165]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

That's absurd.
Just include the camera.

M.K.
Knight165

[mestevo]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

There will be camera bundles in the US when it launches. Retailers will soft-bundle them anyways.

This lets them say it's $399. Just a PR thing. They are making money on each one sold at this price point too.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

[daniel77733]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

The camera and move controllers went up 1000% percent on Amazon the other day so when you think about it, there's no reason for Sony to include them as anyone who buys PSVR will at the very least obviously spend the money on the camera which im sure they have warehouses full of so it makes sense from a business standpoint as whatever amount of cameras they sell is basically just free money at this point in time.

Personally, I have no interest in VR of any kind and truly hope that it dies out quickly simply because that's not how I want video games to go in the future.

[Artman22]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I'm actually a little interested in the PlayStation VR. I'll probably buy it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Smallville102001]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

I have no interest in this at all I mean 399 is a lot. That is like the price of a system. I think I will just save that 399 for ps5 lol.

[Boltman]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I'm actually a little interested in the PlayStation VR. I'll probably buy it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'll be buying it as well, I already have the camera.

Looking forward to it.

Sent from my SM-T230NU using Tapatalk

[fatleg3]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

I'm interested in the VR but no way will I pay the same price I paid for my system.....Even more if you include the cost of the camera......

[dickey1331]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

I already have the camera since I own Just Dance. Not sure if I'll get PSVR or not. I'll have to wait and see how well it is.

[Jr.]

Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion

Installed PS Vue last night on our two Fire Sticks. It's working great so far. Very clear stream. It's a little tedious to navigate because the menus are really slow, but that's the only complaint I have so far. Definitely an upgrade over Sling.