NASA Cover-up

[23]

Re: NASA Cover-up

Showing life on other planets could have a negative effect on every religious organization.

Guess that takes us into the whole "where did life begin" theory again.

[SPTO]

Re: NASA Cover-up

Guess that takes us into the whole "where did life begin" theory again.

I won't open up the can of worms but think liberally and you'll see why some theologians now believe the big bang theory and such as proof of a Divine Creator.

[23]

Re: NASA Cover-up

I won't open up the can of worms but think liberally and you'll see why some theologians now believe the big bang theory and such as proof of a Divine Creator.

I know we're finite so in a sense we're born narrow minded as someone delicately put it.

Therefore, how can the pot call the kettle black for believing A or Z?

[Money99]

Re: NASA Cover-up

I know we're finite so in a sense we're born narrow minded as someone delicately put it.

Therefore, how can the pot call the kettle black for believing A or Z?

Good question.

But for the sake of keeping this thread alive lets try and stay away from the religious overtones this discovery might bring.

Whether you believe in God or not, I think everyone's interested to see proof of life outside our solar system.

[23]

Re: NASA Cover-up

Good question.

But for the sake of keeping this thread alive lets try and stay away from the religious overtones this discovery might bring.

Whether you believe in God or not, I think everyone's interested to see proof of life outside our solar system.

Welp, no religiousness in my post but the question always leads back to the same.

Where did life begin?

[Heelfan71]

Re: NASA Cover-up

I have seen photos and don't think they proof anything.

[Heelfan71]

Re: NASA Cover-up

Just wanted to clarify I am interested in this. Here are 2 pics that you can tell were blurred out by Nasa





moon base

[mudtiger]

Re: NASA Cover-up

At least those look better than the face on mars that ended up just being giant pixels from low quality imaging. With a good telescope, wouldn't you be able to see whatever that is if you know where to look? Hard to tell scale from the shot, but looks pretty big, or at least the crater next to it in the 2nd shot looks big.

[Graphik]

Re: NASA Cover-up

It would be pretty interesting if man already went to the moon billions of years ago from earth and mankind has been whiped out by natural disasters or extinction events time and time again throughout earths history.

[Money99]

Re: NASA Cover-up

At least those look better than the face on mars that ended up just being giant pixels from low quality imaging. With a good telescope, wouldn't you be able to see whatever that is if you know where to look? Hard to tell scale from the shot, but looks pretty big, or at least the crater next to it in the 2nd shot looks big.

That's what she said.

[23]

Re: NASA Cover-up

Thanks for the pics Heelfan.

[fistofrage]

Re: NASA Cover-up

I'm not even positive we landed on the moon let alone saw signs of aliens there. We can't even keep space shuttles from exploding let alone land on the moon with tin can technology back in the 1960's.

[MassNole]

Re: NASA Cover-up

I'm not even positive we landed on the moon let alone saw signs of aliens there. We can't even keep space shuttles from exploding let alone land on the moon with tin can technology back in the 1960's.

Wow............

[23]

Re: NASA Cover-up

I'm not even positive we landed on the moon let alone saw signs of aliens there. We can't even keep space shuttles from exploding let alone land on the moon with tin can technology back in the 1960's.

I won't go as far as saying man hasn't been in space or the moon, but I will say I think we don't really belong out there.

[jmood88]

Re: NASA Cover-up

http://www.press.org/

<table border="0" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td valign="top"></td> <td valign="top">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top">
</td> <td valign="top">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top">
</td> <td valign="top">
</td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top">
</td> <td valign="top">
</td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top">
</td> <td valign="top">
</td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top">
</td> <td valign="top">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top">This sounds pretty interesting, if of course this is real.
</td> <td valign="top">
</td></tr></tbody></table>

I've never heard of that but it would be really interesting. I don't know why they would cover it up though.