Re: 10,000 B.C.

[bkfount]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

10000 BC was HORRIBLE. 8 of us went to see and all thought it stunk.... 3 of us slept through some of it.

CG were BAD, acting was WORSE, and what was it about again? the story was rancid....

the most disappointed i've been in a movie EVER. there is no possible way ANYONE liked this movie. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE

please..... please, do not go and waste your money on this movie, i beg you. at the VERY least, wait until it's out on DVD or sucker your friend in a game of rock/paper/scissors and have HIM buy it for you but DO NOT PAY TO WATCH THIS STEAMING PILE OF DUNG WITH CORN!!!!!!!!

I saw it on a whim and it's not that bad, come on. It's kind of slow, and spent way too much time on the build up, only to have a short predictable ending. Stuff plenty of other movies do. It was entertaining enough to see it on a big screen for $5. Waste of money? I spend more on a meal from mcdonalds.

I think the attacks on it being inaccurate are stupid, as nothing hinted at this being a discovery channel documentary. It wasn't great, but it isn't even the worst movie out right now. I'd at least give it a 7/10.

Spoiler

It would have been interesting for them to go more into the atlantians, or whoever they were, but they were only portrayed as something like egyptians, who liked to whip slaves. The whole concept was quickly explained in one sentence.

It even had some things that could be unofficially linked to stargate, since he did make that movie too.

[faster]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

Well, out of EIGHT of us, one guy gave it a 2 out of 5... everyone said it was a 1 or 1.5. We hated it and thought it was putrid. Sadly, we've talked about how bad it was almost every day since seeing it. I'm glad you enjoyed it somewhat. We thought the acting horrible, the computer graphics were laughable, the story pure crap, and more than anything, it was actually quite boring overall. Guess I already said that, didn't I ? Ugh....

[bkfount]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

Well, out of EIGHT of us, one guy gave it a 2 out of 5... everyone said it was a 1 or 1.5. We hated it and thought it was putrid. Sadly, we've talked about how bad it was almost every day since seeing it. I'm glad you enjoyed it somewhat. We thought the acting horrible, the computer graphics were laughable, the story pure crap, and more than anything, it was actually quite boring overall. Guess I already said that, didn't I ? Ugh....

well movies are like that. Every movie has people who like or hate it. I agree that it's a little slow, and has some flaws, but it's entertaining enough for the $5 I paid.

[lasthour]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

You do realize that a historian does not accurately know what really happened 10,000 years ago, right?

[TheGenius]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

You do realize that a historian does not accurately know what really happened 10,000 years ago, right?

But they do know what really happened 12,000 years ago.

[Scott]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

I guess I'm one of the few that actually liked this movie.

[Blzer]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

But they do know what really happened 12,000 years ago.

12,008

[videobastard]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

It was decent. But it feels like a rip off of apocalypto and 300.

[Scott]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

It was decent. But it feels like a rip off of apocalypto and 300.

I never saw Apocalypto, but It did resemble 300..

[marshallfever]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

I can't believe I didn't post about this movie after i saw it, one of the worst movies of last year. The cinematography was very good, but overall one of the worst movies i have ever seen. The story was sh*ta** and the acting was probably as bad.

It felt like a sh*ta** version of Apocalypto with 300 and some Day After Tomorrow. However rolling good movies into one doesn't mean its going to be a hit. But again, the cinematography was awesome and most of the special effects were alright. The Saber tooth looked horrible CI though

[Boltman]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

I have to get at least a "10" on the "Tomatometer" before I think about seeing a movie.

Damn! You almost never go to the movies eh?

[Herky]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

It's in my Netflex que and I'm preparing for the worst. Hopefully since it's Blu-Ray it will suck in style.

[Blzer]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

Damn! You almost never go to the movies eh?

10 out of 100? Meet the Spartans exceeded that score.

Does this movie not have any dialogue?


EDIT: Guess my memory isn't so fresh, seeing that Meet the Spartans only got 2%.

[DTX3]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

Wow, is it really that bad of a movie? Half.com has the Blu-Ray for $20...and im thinking of pulling the trigger.

[nxt]

Re: 10,000 B.C.

This movie is terrible. I reluctantly saw it with my cousin, who fell for the hype trailer. I should've known better after reading the early reviews.