Skipped out on After Earth and never got a chance yet to see Wayward Pines, but when being mildly entertained with Devil and The Visit, it looks like he may have rekindled enough to garner attention for this one, and may officially "be back" all the same.
M. Night Shyamalan - Split (January 20, 2017)
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
M. Night Shyamalan - Split (January 20, 2017)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/84TouqfIsiI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Skipped out on After Earth and never got a chance yet to see Wayward Pines, but when being mildly entertained with Devil and The Visit, it looks like he may have rekindled enough to garner attention for this one, and may officially "be back" all the same.Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60Tags: None -
Re: M. Night Shyamalan - Split (January 20, 2017)
I've heard some good things about this. Apparently McAvoy is amazing in it.Comment
-
Comment
-
-= Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.=- Edward MurphyComment
-
Re: M. Night Shyamalan - Split (January 20, 2017)
James McAvoy was bloody outstanding. M. Night had a great character to work with, muddled it a little bit (you know, demonizing the illness and whatnot like DID is a negative thing we should ostracize) and ran two hours in something that, although mildly entertaining and interesting, and even attempts to pay it off, doesn't get my full bode.
It's kind of weird, and doesn't all click as you're watching it, but it was kind of cool too. I'd call it a "nice change of pace," but the captivity thing has been done recently (10 Clovefield Lane says hello). Still, the star of the show steals it, and he's almost worth the price of admission alone.
Otherwise... rent it. I'm not calling it bad at all, but there is nothing gained by watching it in theater. In fact, it's one of those movies where a bad crowd can really ruin the tone, you know?
Good, but whereas M. Night has great ideas (and even some great shots), his storytelling could use a couple of other people throwing ideas around the room to really emboss all that would make this film deeper than it delivers to be. Not groundbreaking, and even though I'm glad I watched it, I don't find much reason to rewatch it. It's one of those films that I wish necessitated many rewatches given the number of personalities, etc.
I am however confident to say that M. Night Shyamalan is "back," even though it's not my favorite of his flicks.Last edited by Blzer; 01-30-2017, 12:19 AM.Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60Comment
-
Re: M. Night Shyamalan - Split (January 20, 2017)
Just saw this. Enjoyed it. James McAvoy was fantastic!
Sent from my LGLS991 using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: M. Night Shyamalan - Split (January 20, 2017)
James McAvoy was bloody outstanding. M. Night had a great character to work with, muddled it a little bit (you know, demonizing the illness and whatnot like DID is a negative thing we should ostracize) and ran two hours in something that, although mildly entertaining and interesting, and even attempts to pay it off, doesn't get my full bode.
It's kind of weird, and doesn't all click as you're watching it, but it was kind of cool too. I'd call it a "nice change of pace," but the captivity thing has been done recently (10 Clovefield Lane says hello). Still, the star of the show steals it, and he's almost worth the price of admission alone.
Otherwise... rent it. I'm not calling it bad at all, but there is nothing gained by watching it in theater. In fact, it's one of those movies where a bad crowd can really ruin the tone, you know?
Dude, people behind me were 13 year old girls who laughed during the most intense and serious moments... definitely rent this movie to avoid that type of dumb stuff.
But it was a good movie, worth a watch
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsOrangemen | Eagles | 76ers
Comment
-
Comment