</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
pk500 said:
The more I think about it, the more I realize maybe Xbox Next doesn't need a hard drive.
Unless you're ripping a lot of custom soundtracks on the drive, how many people even scratch the surface of the drive's capacity unless you own a shedload of games and play a lot of franchises and memory-hogging modes?
I owned 13 Xbox games at my high-water mark, had every Ghost Recon Island Thunder and Rainbow Six map, had a ton of ESPN NFL rosters, settings and a season and downloaded the Kapalua course for Links 2004, and the hard drive still said it had 50,000+ blocks left. That's a ton of unused space.
I think MS figured a lot more developers would take advantage of the hard drive for more than just memory, using it for part of the gameplay like Blinx the Time Sweeper. Well, that hasn't happened.
So it makes sense for MS to use large-capacity flash storage, hopefully a hell of a lot more than 8 MB but nowhere near 8 GB, to save money for Xbox Next. Gates may have Grand Canyon-esque pockets, but MS still is losing money on every Xbox sold. Stockholders don't like to see that gushing red ink.
Honestly, how many of you guys have even used 4 GB of your Xbox hard drive? How many have even used 1 GB? I think 80 percent of the gamers out there would be pleased as punch with a 1 GB flash device.
Take care,
PK
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
yeah good point, i mean maybe the hard drive should only be like 1 or 2 gb.
Comment