Call Of Duty WWII

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • countryboy
    Growing pains
    • Sep 2003
    • 52694

    #271
    Re: Call Of Duty WWII

    Originally posted by pk500
    Enjoy your five hours of gameplay for $60. When is the last time either Treyarch or Infinity Ward invested a lot of time into a satisfying, lengthy Campaign mode for a COD game? COD:MW or WaW?
    I honestly don't care how long the campaign is so long as its enjoyable and keeps me entertained and wanting to continue to play throughout.

    And thanks to GCU it will only be about $50 to play.
    I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.

    I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(


    Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals

    Comment

    • PhilliesFan13
      Banned
      • May 2009
      • 15651

      #272
      Re: Call Of Duty WWII

      Originally posted by pk500
      Enjoy your five hours of gameplay for $60. When is the last time either Treyarch or Infinity Ward invested a lot of time into a satisfying, lengthy Campaign mode for a COD game? COD:MW or WaW?
      Good thing I didn't pay $60 then. Got it for way less than that.

      Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • allBthere
        All Star
        • Jan 2008
        • 5847

        #273
        Re: Call Of Duty WWII

        Originally posted by Boltman
        He basically reiterates what I've been saying. Game just feels old. This would've been a decent cod... if it came out 10 years ago.

        This game is a bad joke.

        https://youtu.be/c4MRuC9fXXs
        I disagree that it would have been decent 10 years ago. At that time mw came out and I'm still playing, and loving it. It's honestly still soooo good. It's crazy how old it is and how much better it is than ww2. Way better maps, way more balanced, way better period.
        Liquor in the front, poker in the rear.

        Comment

        • TheDutchDad
          MVP
          • Apr 2004
          • 2814

          #274
          Re: Call Of Duty WWII

          I don't think think it's as bad as some have said. But it's also not great, so far. Full release might be better. At least I can say I'm no longer having to shoot people as they jump on trampolines.

          Sent from my SM-G955U using Operation Sports mobile app

          Comment

          • Rawdeal28
            Swiitch U? lol
            • Oct 2007
            • 7407

            #275
            Re: Call Of Duty WWII

            Originally posted by PhilliesFan13
            Does anyone even play the campaign or just the multiplayer? Just because multiplayer looks like garbage doesn't mean the campaign will be. I played the beta once last weekend and haven't even touched it since.

            Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
            First off let me say thank you again to Caniac for the beta code.

            Now, I can't believe I'm saying this but I think I'm getting to the point where I may be getting too old for COD. that and the fact that COD games now are just terribly designed. Treyarch's version of COD is the only one I like anymore. I really like Black ops 3 and I have had the game since I got my PS4 last August but lately even after half an hour of playing I get a little headache and have to stop.

            I'm not interested in World War II games but I did want to give this one a try at least. I hated the First World at War. Like everyone has mentioned the Time to Kill it's just absurd. Two shots and you're dead but I unload a full clip and magically they stay alive. It's like everyone else is on a T1 connection and I'm on dial-up (no I'm not really on dial-up).

            My main thing though is the maps. Although I do like the Gibraltar map, all the maps are the typical COD maps. 3-4 ways to get into every building or area. Funnel everyone to the long hallways and/or alleyways. Kill someone and they will spawn right behind you for the Revenge kill. Rinse, repeat. Same ****, different toilet.

            Sorry I'm not good enough to run around like a chicken with my head cut off and have my head on a swivel and kill people with my SMG from long distances. I thought I would never say this but Call of Duty multiplayer needs a makeover in a big way.

            Now to answer the question I quoted, like I said before I'm not into the World War II era stuff but if the story is good I'll GameFly it and play it or something. I'll be skipping Call of Duty for the second year in a row. I'll pick up Modern Warfare remastered and try to get my jollies out of that lol.

            Sent from my Z981 using Tapatalk
            Last edited by Rawdeal28; 09-03-2017, 08:57 PM.
            "on hoping there is a PSN flash sale before Valentine's Day"
            Man there are no flashers... now what are we going to do for vd
            I'm sure there's plenty of prostitutes you could pay if you really want vd.
            yea but will they take psn cards
            Depends on what area of a hooker you would use to redeem them.

            lol

            Comment

            • Boltman
              L.A. to S.D. to HI
              • Mar 2004
              • 18283

              #276
              Re: Call Of Duty WWII

              Originally posted by allBthere
              I disagree that it would have been decent 10 years ago. At that time mw came out and I'm still playing, and loving it. It's honestly still soooo good. It's crazy how old it is and how much better it is than ww2. Way better maps, way more balanced, way better period.
              You're right I stand corrected.

              This game wouldn't have been decent 10 years ago, it still would've sucked.

              I really enjoyed MW3 & BO2

              Comment

              • Stormyhog
                All Star
                • Feb 2004
                • 5304

                #277
                Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                Originally posted by Rawdeal28
                First off let me say thank you again to Caniac for the beta code.

                Now, I can't believe I'm saying this but I think I'm getting to the point where I may be getting too old for COD. that and the fact that COD games now are just terribly designed. Treyarch's version of COD is the only one I like anymore. I really like Black ops 3 and I have had the game since I got my PS4 last August but lately even after half an hour of playing I get a little headache and have to stop.

                I'm not interested in World War II games but I did want to give this one a try at least. I hated the First World at War. Like everyone has mentioned the Time to Kill it's just absurd. Two shots and you're dead but I unload a full clip and magically they stay alive. It's like everyone else is on a T1 connection and I'm on dial-up (no I'm not really on dial-up).

                My main thing though is the maps. Although I do like the Gibraltar map, all the maps are the typical COD maps. 3-4 ways to get into every building or area. Funnel everyone to the long hallways and/or alleyways. Kill someone and they will spawn right behind you for the Revenge kill. Rinse, repeat. Same ****, different toilet.

                Sorry I'm not good enough to run around like a chicken with my head cut off and have my head on a swivel and kill people with my SMG from long distances. I thought I would never say this but Call of Duty multiplayer needs a makeover in a big way.

                Now to answer the question I quoted, like I said before I'm not into the World War II era stuff but if the story is good I'll GameFly it and play it or something. I'll be skipping Call of Duty for the second year in a row. I'll pick up Modern Warfare remastered and try to get my jollies out of that lol.

                Sent from my Z981 using Tapatalk
                You're welcome (I'm Caniac) I love WWII setting but there are issues that frustrate me like the bunny hopping, hit detection, quick scoping, time to kill. I'm still getting the game but it doesn't wow me. I agree with you COD needs to shake things up as it has gotten stale for me for the last while. The engine is to dated.
                "If you don't have anything good to say, say it often"- Ed the sock

                Comment

                • Methlab
                  MVP
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 2384

                  #278
                  Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                  Agree with everyone. Played the beta and just did not feel that into it. COD used to be a game that I picked up and played for hours at a time, especially on a beta release with limited time.

                  I canceled my preorder of the game. I much prefer rainbow 6 siege and titanfall for FPS.

                  Comment

                  • Stormyhog
                    All Star
                    • Feb 2004
                    • 5304

                    #279
                    Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                    Multiplayer gun upgrade trailer. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4KXrm4oYIoE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
                    "If you don't have anything good to say, say it often"- Ed the sock

                    Comment

                    • Stormyhog
                      All Star
                      • Feb 2004
                      • 5304

                      #280
                      Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                      Sniping is complete nonsense in this game. Here are pics I took when I was killed by snipers. As you can see you don't even have to be on target as the hitbox's are so big. Also for it to be a one hit kill is ridiculous considering the area where he's hitting me. I was also full health.
                      Attached Files
                      "If you don't have anything good to say, say it often"- Ed the sock

                      Comment

                      • SeaTownGamer
                        MVP
                        • Jul 2015
                        • 1551

                        #281
                        Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                        Originally posted by Stormyhog
                        Sniping is complete nonsense in this game. Here are pics I took when I was killed by snipers. As you can see you don't even have to be on target as the hitbox's are so big. Also for it to be a one hit kill is ridiculous considering the area where he's hitting me. I was also full health.


                        Are you new to call of duty games? This shouldn't be a surprise for anyone familiar with the franchise lol.


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                        Comment

                        • Stormyhog
                          All Star
                          • Feb 2004
                          • 5304

                          #282
                          Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                          Originally posted by SeaTownGamer
                          Are you new to call of duty games? This shouldn't be a surprise for anyone familiar with the franchise lol.


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          No COD 3 on the PS3 was my first online COD. Also played them on the PS2 when the franchise first started. I'm just showing how silly & outdated there online system is. It really does needs an overhaul.
                          "If you don't have anything good to say, say it often"- Ed the sock

                          Comment

                          • Godgers12
                            MVP
                            • Dec 2012
                            • 2265

                            #283
                            Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                            Originally posted by Stormyhog
                            No COD 3 on the PS3 was my first online COD. Also played them on the PS2 when the franchise first started. I'm just showing how silly & outdated there online system is. It really does needs an overhaul.
                            They reward quickscoping, by increasing the hit marker radius. It's utter nonsense. I would love nothing more than for them to add a half second delay from when you aim down the scope to when you can fire. That would eliminate quickscoping. But all the kids that quickscope would bitch and moan, so I don't see it ever happening. As it stands, quickscoping is glitching and CoD enables them to do so.


                            War mode is legit and addicting though.
                            Green Bay PackersSeattle MarinersNew York Rangers
                            Syracuse Orange

                            If walls could talk to spill the lies, we'd see the world through devils eyes
                            -M. Shadows

                            Comment

                            • allBthere
                              All Star
                              • Jan 2008
                              • 5847

                              #284
                              Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                              Originally posted by Godgers12
                              They reward quickscoping, by increasing the hit marker radius. It's utter nonsense. I would love nothing more than for them to add a half second delay from when you aim down the scope to when you can fire. That would eliminate quickscoping. But all the kids that quickscope would bitch and moan, so I don't see it ever happening. As it stands, quickscoping is glitching and CoD enables them to do so.


                              War mode is legit and addicting though.
                              war mode was the only fun I had, but I wonder how many maps in the retail version? If I had to guess it would be like 3.

                              To me this is where COD has fallen off the most is in the actual maps and map design. I'm playing cod4 almost every other day right now and they are mostly just so well balanced and cater to any play style. Newer cod maps are just strange and often don't make intuitive sense or have strange 'paths' that are supposed to look natural but don't at all and function to ruin the experience. I'd rather they just drop a real world location in around the same surface area and call it a day.
                              Their 'designing' is terrible imo.
                              Liquor in the front, poker in the rear.

                              Comment

                              • Stormyhog
                                All Star
                                • Feb 2004
                                • 5304

                                #285
                                Re: Call Of Duty WWII

                                Originally posted by Godgers12
                                They reward quickscoping, by increasing the hit marker radius. It's utter nonsense. I would love nothing more than for them to add a half second delay from when you aim down the scope to when you can fire. That would eliminate quickscoping. But all the kids that quickscope would bitch and moan, so I don't see it ever happening. As it stands, quickscoping is glitching and CoD enables them to do so.


                                War mode is legit and addicting though.
                                Yeah I would be happy with that as well. I'd even reduce sniper damage in close unless a headshot. Snipers than would think twice about engaging in close. So if they hit anywhere but the head it'll take multiple shot's for the kill. We can talk about this all day but we all know they won't address it. As for War mode it's by far my fave & look forward to see what other maps it'll have.
                                "If you don't have anything good to say, say it often"- Ed the sock

                                Comment

                                Working...