Re: The Global Warming Scare: Hey, let's use kids!! Yeah!
Your personal belief appears to be biased towards the fact that the majority of civilized countries have economic reasons for acknowleging the threat of global warming (as you stated in your previous post), so I am highly critical of your neutral ties in this argument. 650 scientists (who believe it or not, ARE in the minority in the scheme of meteorogy experts in the world) saying why they are skeptical is completly different than involved studies which the governments of countries lend creedence to as being amongst the definitive evidence showcasing the threat of global warming. At this point, even the republican organizations are starting to believe the legitimacy to global warming and it is starting to branch away from being a political issue at this point in time. Obviously the previous information I linked was because of its significance, not because of the number of scientists who led the particular study. Obviously there are many more than 52 scientists who back global warming, and quite frankly that is a weak argument because whatever I linked was not to showcase strength in numbers, but the significance of the data itself. It is safe to say that the majority of scientists in the world are backing this phenomenon, and you yourself more or less acknolwedge this with your Aristotle analogy.
Your personal belief appears to be biased towards the fact that the majority of civilized countries have economic reasons for acknowleging the threat of global warming (as you stated in your previous post), so I am highly critical of your neutral ties in this argument. 650 scientists (who believe it or not, ARE in the minority in the scheme of meteorogy experts in the world) saying why they are skeptical is completly different than involved studies which the governments of countries lend creedence to as being amongst the definitive evidence showcasing the threat of global warming. At this point, even the republican organizations are starting to believe the legitimacy to global warming and it is starting to branch away from being a political issue at this point in time. Obviously the previous information I linked was because of its significance, not because of the number of scientists who led the particular study. Obviously there are many more than 52 scientists who back global warming, and quite frankly that is a weak argument because whatever I linked was not to showcase strength in numbers, but the significance of the data itself. It is safe to say that the majority of scientists in the world are backing this phenomenon, and you yourself more or less acknolwedge this with your Aristotle analogy.
Comment