What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

[Po Pimp]

I remember a while back there was a thread that said to describe your turnoffs in a woman. Think about that for a minute.

NOW, what if you met someone who encapsulates all of the personality turnoffs you had, but they were physically your perfect match. Would you rather be with them, or the person who is a perfect match for you personality-wise, but physically, be the opposite of everything you're looking for?

This isn't a one night stand type thing either...lets say you have to be with them for 6 months...LOL

[J0nnD0ugh]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

If it was an either/or choice, I'd choose neither. I've known plenty of attractive women I wanted to beat the ugly into. & nice personalities I'd never consider having an amorous relationship w/, becasue they just didn't "do it" for me. No matter how well we got along.

[bsb13]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

I say personality...I can always guzzle down enough booze to make any woman attractive.

[Cusefan]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

Looks for a fun night, Personality for a fun year(or many).

[chadskee]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

I say personality...I can always guzzle down enough booze to make any woman attractive.

lol ^^

I'll say neither because no matter what you have to be somewhat attracted to your mate. But at the same time you can't hate every moment you are with them.

[Po Pimp]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

If it was an either/or choice, I'd choose neither. I've known plenty of attractive women I wanted to beat the ugly into. & nice personalities I'd never consider having an amorous relationship w/, becasue they just didn't "do it" for me. No matter how well we got along.

That's the easy answer. This was meant to be a hypothetical. Would you rather be around someone who looks good, but you can't stand, or someone you have a lot in common with, but looking at them might induce vomiting (exaggeration)?

[SPTO]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

I think it's a combination of both. You need to be attracted to her but she doesn't have to be drop dead sexy. At the same time you don't want to be involved with a woman who drives you crazy (in the bad way) all the time.

[youvalss]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

This thread reminded me to watch Shallow Hal again.

[MC Fatigue]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

I'll say neither because no matter what you have to be somewhat attracted to your mate. But at the same time you can't hate every moment you are with them.

This. Hypothetical questions are usually pretty stupid, and this is no exception. I'd have to say neither in this case; I'd rather just be alone than be with either of those people.

[Po Pimp]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

Some of yall are making this deeper than I wanted it to be. Would you rather be with someone who is your ideal mate physically, but you can't stand her at ALL, or someone who clicks with you perfectly, but she's the EXACT opposite of someone you would be attracted to?

The only two things these women have in common are their adoration for you and their skills in the bedroom.

[Scottdau]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

Money. In all honesty it is kinda both. You have to be attracted to the person, but after awhile looks go and then you are suck with that person. So you better hope you like them.

[CWSapp757]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

I mean, if I had to pick between the two id definitely say personality in regards to a long term relationship. A pretty face can only get you but so far. I know plenty of pretty girls I work with that would probably drive me crazy if I were actually out on a date with them.

[J0nnD0ugh]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

That's the easy answer. This was meant to be a hypothetical. Would you rather be around someone who looks good, but you can't stand, or someone you have a lot in common with, but looking at them might induce vomiting (exaggeration)?

I'm assuming sex is involved. Which the answer would have to be neither. Sorry that's too easy for you. But to me, both would be a miserable existence. I don't care how good-looking a woman could be, if she irritates me, she becomes ugly real quick. I don't care how nice a woman could be, if I;m stuck w/someone who I don't find appealing, I'll end up hating her. So neither.

[NYG_Meth]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

Only 6 months? I can tolerate a lot of stupid for 6 months if she's really nice to look at.

[Po Pimp]

Re: What's More Important: Looks Vs. Personality?

Money. In all honesty it is kinda both. You have to be attracted to the person, but after awhile looks go and then you are suck with that person. So you better hope you like them.

Its obviously a combination of both, BUT if you HAD to choose one extreme Vs. the other, what would it be? I said you have to be with them 6 months because if it was a one night thing, 100% would choose the attractive girl...lol

For me, based on these extremes, I think I would have to choose looks. Call me shallow, but I can't see myself even wanting to know a chick (in that way) that I have ZERO physical attraction toward.