Re: Off Topic 2012

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

Re: Off Topic 2012

Lol, so Syracuse's University Union announced today that our Block Party concert headliner is going to be some bum DJ named Kaskade and Cold War Kids... an hour later, #ThingsIdRatherDoThanGoToBlockParty was the #1 world wide trend on twitter...

[TheMatrix31]

Re: Off Topic 2012

Alligator is good. Really good. In fact, Alligator taste better than deer.


Fact.



/Louisiana'd

Alligator sausage is amazing. A German brats place by my house does them to perfection. Delicious.

Explain this to me: Chick has been begging me to go somewhere with her but I've always been really busy, then the one day I'm not busy she decides she doesn't want to go? WTF?

Chicks are stupid. All of them. Stop trying to make sense of them.

[l3ulvl]

Re: Off Topic 2012

Cow tongue >>>>>>>> alligator tail

[ImTellinTim]

Re: Off Topic 2012

It's called venison, not deer, lol.

Someone at work always has a surplus, so I'll get steaks, jerky, sausage, etc. Good stuff.

[canes21]

Re: Off Topic 2012

So, if we could travel at speeds much faster than light, and set up camp 65 million light years away, could we get a telescope so powerful that we could see Earth, and then not only look at how the Earth looked back then(the continents shape, amount of ice, etc.) but could we also wait and see if a meteorite did strike the Earth and kill all dinosaurs?

I mean, it all seems to make sense in my head. It also seems like if we had the telescope focused in on the Earth the entire time somehow, that as the ship carrying it flew at those insane speeds from Earth, we'd basically get to watch the history of Earth in reverse from the time it left to however many light years away they went. So in my head I feel as we traveled from 60 million light years away to 70 million light years away, that we'd be able to see what happened in the time frame, but on a very fast forward like reel.

So to me, that basically means if we flew 10 million light years per hour, that flying from 60 to 70 million light years away, we'd see every single thing that happened in those 10 million years all in one hour, and then could go back and watch the footage at any speed we wanted which would then allow us to slow it down whenever and we could pick any part of history after a few simple math equations so we'd know exactly what part of history we're looking at, and then we'd know for sure what the Earth looked like, the climate, etc.

This whole idea seems like it could benefit so much of science and history. Do you guys even understand me at all, or have I gone crazy all of a sudden?

[l3ulvl]

Re: Off Topic 2012

So, if we could travel at speeds much faster than light, and set up camp 65 million light years away, could we get a telescope so powerful that we could see Earth, and then not only look at how the Earth looked back then(the continents shape, amount of ice, etc.) but could we also wait and see if a meteorite did strike the Earth and kill all dinosaurs?

I mean, it all seems to make sense in my head. It also seems like if we had the telescope focused in on the Earth the entire time somehow, that as the ship carrying it flew at those insane speeds from Earth, we'd basically get to watch the history of Earth in reverse from the time it left to however many light years away they went. So in my head I feel as we traveled from 60 million light years away to 70 million light years away, that we'd be able to see what happened in the time frame, but on a very fast forward like reel.

So to me, that basically means if we flew 10 million light years per hour, that flying from 60 to 70 million light years away, we'd see every single thing that happened in those 10 million years all in one hour, and then could go back and watch the footage at any speed we wanted which would then allow us to slow it down whenever and we could pick any part of history after a few simple math equations so we'd know exactly what part of history we're looking at, and then we'd know for sure what the Earth looked like, the climate, etc.

This whole idea seems like it could benefit so much of science and history. Do you guys even understand me at all, or have I gone crazy all of a sudden?

Does this remind anyone else of when George Costanza's gf had mono, so his mind was free to function 100% ?

[Nathan_OS]

Are you guys really talking about eating Alligator.

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

[TheMatrix31]

Re: Off Topic 2012

Does this remind anyone else of when George Costanza's gf had mono, so his mind was free to function 100% ?

What is "Chicken Kiev"?

[Watson]

Re: Off Topic 2012

Are you guys really talking about eating Alligator.

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Don't knock it till you try it.

[Nathan_OS]

Don't knock it till you try it.

. Never.

10char

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

[C the Lyte]

Re: Off Topic 2012

Don't knock it till you try it.

I've heard it was fantastic, but don't know where I can find it around me. I think a place in Reidsville sells it? That and buffalo. I've heard that is awesome. But again, where?

I find it hard to believe that gator tastes better than deer, er, "venison" though.

[ImTellinTim]

Re: Off Topic 2012

So, if we could travel at speeds much faster than light, and set up camp 65 million light years away, could we get a telescope so powerful that we could see Earth, and then not only look at how the Earth looked back then(the continents shape, amount of ice, etc.) but could we also wait and see if a meteorite did strike the Earth and kill all dinosaurs?

I mean, it all seems to make sense in my head. It also seems like if we had the telescope focused in on the Earth the entire time somehow, that as the ship carrying it flew at those insane speeds from Earth, we'd basically get to watch the history of Earth in reverse from the time it left to however many light years away they went. So in my head I feel as we traveled from 60 million light years away to 70 million light years away, that we'd be able to see what happened in the time frame, but on a very fast forward like reel.

So to me, that basically means if we flew 10 million light years per hour, that flying from 60 to 70 million light years away, we'd see every single thing that happened in those 10 million years all in one hour, and then could go back and watch the footage at any speed we wanted which would then allow us to slow it down whenever and we could pick any part of history after a few simple math equations so we'd know exactly what part of history we're looking at, and then we'd know for sure what the Earth looked like, the climate, etc.

This whole idea seems like it could benefit so much of science and history. Do you guys even understand me at all, or have I gone crazy all of a sudden?

Theoretically speaking, you should lay off the grass.

[BlueNGold]

Re: Off Topic 2012

Theoretically speaking, you should lay off the grass.

Drugs are bad, mmkay?

[Watson]

Re: Off Topic 2012

Theoretically speaking, you should lay off the grass.

What'd I do is just like...ya know, you know what I mean? Like...

[Boltman]

Re: Off Topic 2012

That movie was so damn bizarre man.