Off Topic 2012

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Yeah...THAT Guy
    Once in a Lifetime Memory
    • Dec 2006
    • 17294

    #13426
    Re: Off Topic 2012

    Lol, so Syracuse's University Union announced today that our Block Party concert headliner is going to be some bum DJ named Kaskade and Cold War Kids... an hour later, #ThingsIdRatherDoThanGoToBlockParty was the #1 world wide trend on twitter...
    NFL: Bills
    NBA: Bucks
    MLB: Cubs
    NCAA: Syracuse
    Soccer: USMNT/DC United

    PSN: ButMyT-GunDont

    Comment

    • TheMatrix31
      RF
      • Jul 2002
      • 52907

      #13427
      Re: Off Topic 2012

      Originally posted by WatsonTiger
      Alligator is good. Really good. In fact, Alligator taste better than deer.


      Fact.



      /Louisiana'd
      Alligator sausage is amazing. A German brats place by my house does them to perfection. Delicious.

      Originally posted by adice15
      Explain this to me: Chick has been begging me to go somewhere with her but I've always been really busy, then the one day I'm not busy she decides she doesn't want to go? WTF?
      Chicks are stupid. All of them. Stop trying to make sense of them.

      Comment

      • l3ulvl
        Hall Of Fame
        • Dec 2009
        • 17233

        #13428
        Re: Off Topic 2012

        Cow tongue >>>>>>>> alligator tail
        Wolverines Wings Same Old Lions Tigers Pistons Erika Christensen

        Comment

        • ImTellinTim
          YNWA
          • Sep 2006
          • 33028

          #13429
          Re: Off Topic 2012

          It's called venison, not deer, lol.

          Someone at work always has a surplus, so I'll get steaks, jerky, sausage, etc. Good stuff.

          Comment

          • canes21
            Hall Of Fame
            • Sep 2008
            • 22912

            #13430
            Re: Off Topic 2012

            So, if we could travel at speeds much faster than light, and set up camp 65 million light years away, could we get a telescope so powerful that we could see Earth, and then not only look at how the Earth looked back then(the continents shape, amount of ice, etc.) but could we also wait and see if a meteorite did strike the Earth and kill all dinosaurs?

            I mean, it all seems to make sense in my head. It also seems like if we had the telescope focused in on the Earth the entire time somehow, that as the ship carrying it flew at those insane speeds from Earth, we'd basically get to watch the history of Earth in reverse from the time it left to however many light years away they went. So in my head I feel as we traveled from 60 million light years away to 70 million light years away, that we'd be able to see what happened in the time frame, but on a very fast forward like reel.

            So to me, that basically means if we flew 10 million light years per hour, that flying from 60 to 70 million light years away, we'd see every single thing that happened in those 10 million years all in one hour, and then could go back and watch the footage at any speed we wanted which would then allow us to slow it down whenever and we could pick any part of history after a few simple math equations so we'd know exactly what part of history we're looking at, and then we'd know for sure what the Earth looked like, the climate, etc.

            This whole idea seems like it could benefit so much of science and history. Do you guys even understand me at all, or have I gone crazy all of a sudden?
            “No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”


            ― Plato

            Comment

            • l3ulvl
              Hall Of Fame
              • Dec 2009
              • 17233

              #13431
              Re: Off Topic 2012

              Originally posted by canes21
              So, if we could travel at speeds much faster than light, and set up camp 65 million light years away, could we get a telescope so powerful that we could see Earth, and then not only look at how the Earth looked back then(the continents shape, amount of ice, etc.) but could we also wait and see if a meteorite did strike the Earth and kill all dinosaurs?

              I mean, it all seems to make sense in my head. It also seems like if we had the telescope focused in on the Earth the entire time somehow, that as the ship carrying it flew at those insane speeds from Earth, we'd basically get to watch the history of Earth in reverse from the time it left to however many light years away they went. So in my head I feel as we traveled from 60 million light years away to 70 million light years away, that we'd be able to see what happened in the time frame, but on a very fast forward like reel.

              So to me, that basically means if we flew 10 million light years per hour, that flying from 60 to 70 million light years away, we'd see every single thing that happened in those 10 million years all in one hour, and then could go back and watch the footage at any speed we wanted which would then allow us to slow it down whenever and we could pick any part of history after a few simple math equations so we'd know exactly what part of history we're looking at, and then we'd know for sure what the Earth looked like, the climate, etc.

              This whole idea seems like it could benefit so much of science and history. Do you guys even understand me at all, or have I gone crazy all of a sudden?
              Does this remind anyone else of when George Costanza's gf had mono, so his mind was free to function 100% ?
              Wolverines Wings Same Old Lions Tigers Pistons Erika Christensen

              Comment

              • Nathan_OS
                MVP
                • Jun 2011
                • 4463

                #13432
                Are you guys really talking about eating Alligator.

                Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
                PSN: MajorJosephx

                Comment

                • TheMatrix31
                  RF
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 52907

                  #13433
                  Re: Off Topic 2012

                  Originally posted by l3ulvl
                  Does this remind anyone else of when George Costanza's gf had mono, so his mind was free to function 100% ?
                  What is "Chicken Kiev"?

                  Comment

                  • Watson
                    Burrow Club
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 27013

                    #13434
                    Re: Off Topic 2012

                    Originally posted by Nathan_OS
                    Are you guys really talking about eating Alligator.

                    Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
                    Don't knock it till you try it.
                    And may thy spirit live in us, Forever LSU

                    @AdamdotH

                    Comment

                    • Nathan_OS
                      MVP
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 4463

                      #13435
                      Originally posted by WatsonTiger
                      Don't knock it till you try it.
                      . Never.

                      10char

                      Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
                      PSN: MajorJosephx

                      Comment

                      • C the Lyte
                        Left side, strong side
                        • May 2009
                        • 2253

                        #13436
                        Re: Off Topic 2012

                        Originally posted by WatsonTiger
                        Don't knock it till you try it.
                        I've heard it was fantastic, but don't know where I can find it around me. I think a place in Reidsville sells it? That and buffalo. I've heard that is awesome. But again, where?

                        I find it hard to believe that gator tastes better than deer, er, "venison" though.
                        Last edited by C the Lyte; 03-27-2012, 09:54 AM.
                        EXPERIENCE MAYHEM FOOTBALL

                        Comment

                        • ImTellinTim
                          YNWA
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 33028

                          #13437
                          Re: Off Topic 2012

                          Originally posted by canes21
                          So, if we could travel at speeds much faster than light, and set up camp 65 million light years away, could we get a telescope so powerful that we could see Earth, and then not only look at how the Earth looked back then(the continents shape, amount of ice, etc.) but could we also wait and see if a meteorite did strike the Earth and kill all dinosaurs?

                          I mean, it all seems to make sense in my head. It also seems like if we had the telescope focused in on the Earth the entire time somehow, that as the ship carrying it flew at those insane speeds from Earth, we'd basically get to watch the history of Earth in reverse from the time it left to however many light years away they went. So in my head I feel as we traveled from 60 million light years away to 70 million light years away, that we'd be able to see what happened in the time frame, but on a very fast forward like reel.

                          So to me, that basically means if we flew 10 million light years per hour, that flying from 60 to 70 million light years away, we'd see every single thing that happened in those 10 million years all in one hour, and then could go back and watch the footage at any speed we wanted which would then allow us to slow it down whenever and we could pick any part of history after a few simple math equations so we'd know exactly what part of history we're looking at, and then we'd know for sure what the Earth looked like, the climate, etc.

                          This whole idea seems like it could benefit so much of science and history. Do you guys even understand me at all, or have I gone crazy all of a sudden?
                          Theoretically speaking, you should lay off the grass.

                          Comment

                          • BlueNGold
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 21817

                            #13438
                            Re: Off Topic 2012

                            Originally posted by ImTellinTim
                            Theoretically speaking, you should lay off the grass.
                            Drugs are bad, mmkay?
                            Originally posted by bradtxmale
                            I like 6 inches. Its not too thin and not too thick. You get the support your body needs.



                            Comment

                            • Watson
                              Burrow Club
                              • Jul 2008
                              • 27013

                              #13439
                              Re: Off Topic 2012

                              Originally posted by ImTellinTim
                              Theoretically speaking, you should lay off the grass.
                              What'd I do is just like...ya know, you know what I mean? Like...
                              Last edited by Watson; 03-27-2012, 10:34 AM.
                              And may thy spirit live in us, Forever LSU

                              @AdamdotH

                              Comment

                              • Boltman
                                L.A. to S.D. to HI
                                • Mar 2004
                                • 18283

                                #13440
                                Re: Off Topic 2012

                                Originally posted by WatsonTiger
                                That movie was so damn bizarre man.

                                Comment

                                Working...