Weird potentials

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • seanjeezy
    The Future
    • Aug 2009
    • 3347

    #1

    Weird potentials

    After watching the 40-man roster vid by shake (thanks by the way), I couldn't help but notice some odd potential ratings... yanksdaniel pm'd me and shared the same sentiment as I did, so I decided it was a good idea to make a thread and hopefully there's a chance these will be changed in the future:

    Spoiler


    Anyone notice any other oddities? This list is my personal opinion so obviously it isn't the gospel, I just don't want to see Bryce Harper or Mike Trout be traded for Carlos Triunfel haha
    Bakin' soda, I got bakin' soda
  • Russell_SCEA
    SCEA Community Manager
    • May 2005
    • 4161

    #2
    Re: Weird potentials

    Originally posted by seanjeezy
    After watching the 40-man roster vid by shake (thanks by the way), I couldn't help but notice some odd potential ratings... yanksdaniel pm'd me and shared the same sentiment as I did, so I decided it was a good idea to make a thread and hopefully there's a chance these will be changed in the future:

    Spoiler


    Anyone notice any other oddities? This list is my personal opinion so obviously it isn't the gospel, I just don't want to see Bryce Harper or Mike Trout be traded for Carlos Triunfel haha
    They aren't changing it's a matter of opinion there is no right or wrong answer. We aren't Bugger King.
    Last edited by Russell_SCEA; 03-02-2013, 08:49 PM.

    Comment

    • daddies3angels
      Rookie
      • Mar 2011
      • 311

      #3
      Re: Weird potentials

      Im not fan of potential at all. Wish they would actually get rid of it. Its way to easy to see who going to be superstar. All you have to do to build franchise is load up on alot of young A potential sim 2-3 yrs and then your a playoff team every year. I thought guys potential were way last year to. I dont think they put much effort into that. Wish there was way that we could edit them. (by the way you really named alot of Cubs on that list lol)

      Comment

      • daddies3angels
        Rookie
        • Mar 2011
        • 311

        #4
        Re: Weird potentials

        Originally posted by Russell_SCEA
        They aren't changing its a matter of opinion there is no right or wrong answer. We aren't Bugger King
        GET RID OF POTENTIAL!!!! or make it where we can edit them. Makes HUGE difference for franchise

        Comment

        • yanksdaniel99
          MVP
          • Jun 2011
          • 1185

          #5
          Re: Weird potentials

          Originally posted by Russell_SCEA
          They aren't changing it's a matter of opinion there is no right or wrong answer. We aren't Bugger King.
          Thats fine that they aren't changing, just wanted to bring notice to some things we saw. Guys like Truinfel, Smoak etc. I just don't see any justification of it.

          This would all be solved if we could just edit the potentials of guys already in the game (Although I am well aware of why we can't)
          Last edited by yanksdaniel99; 03-02-2013, 08:57 PM.

          Comment

          • daddies3angels
            Rookie
            • Mar 2011
            • 311

            #6
            Re: Weird potentials

            Originally posted by yanksdaniel99
            Thats fine that they aren't changing, just wanted to bring notice to some things we saw. Guys like Truifel, Smoak etc. I just don't see any justification of it.

            This would all be solved if we could just edit the potentials of guys already in the game (Although I am well aware of why we can't)
            Why cant we??? If its for our own franchise why not?

            Comment

            • seanjeezy
              The Future
              • Aug 2009
              • 3347

              #7
              Re: Weird potentials

              Originally posted by daddies3angels
              GET RID OF POTENTIAL!!!! or make it where we can edit them. Makes HUGE difference for franchise
              Getting rid of potential would be a stretch, but having it editable would be huge... Like you alluded to in your previous post, all you have to do in franchise is stockpile A's and basically set it and forget it lol. Plus there's all of the wacky trades like you said, but that doesn't bother me as much since I use 30-team control.
              Bakin' soda, I got bakin' soda

              Comment

              • daddies3angels
                Rookie
                • Mar 2011
                • 311

                #8
                Re: Weird potentials

                Any idea why we cant edit potential? I know 2K you can ( i realize that game is nothing like this game)

                Comment

                • Russell_SCEA
                  SCEA Community Manager
                  • May 2005
                  • 4161

                  #9
                  Re: Weird potentials

                  Originally posted by daddies3angels
                  Why cant we??? If its for our own franchise why not?
                  Because potential drives player progression, player progression drives overall ratings, overall ratings drives contracts.

                  If we let people edit them it would wreck the team budgets in all season modes and eventually break the game. The engine in the game tries to keep the same number of A's, B's etc......... every year so that the league in 20 years down the road will resemble the league now.

                  Letting people just edit them with no recourse would cause a multitude of problems.

                  Comment

                  • yanksdaniel99
                    MVP
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 1185

                    #10
                    Re: Weird potentials

                    Originally posted by Russell_SCEA
                    Because potential drives player progression, player progression drives overall ratings, overall ratings drives contracts.

                    If we let people edit them it would wreck the team budgets in all season modes and eventually break the game. The engine in the game tries to keep the same number of A's, B's etc......... every year so that the league in 20 years down the road will resemble the league now.

                    Letting people just edit them with no recourse would cause a multitude of problems.
                    The ability of people to just import over players allows the same thing to occur. If you wanted to break the game and have a franchise of all A's it can done relatively easily (just quite time-consuming).

                    Comment

                    • daddies3angels
                      Rookie
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 311

                      #11
                      Re: Weird potentials

                      Originally posted by Russell_SCEA
                      Because potential drives player progression, player progression drives overall ratings, overall ratings drives contracts.

                      If we let people edit them it would wreck the team budgets in all season modes and eventually break the game. The engine in the game tries to keep the same number of A's, B's etc......... every year so that the league in 20 years down the road will resemble the league now.

                      Letting people just edit them with no recourse would cause a multitude of problems.
                      That makes alot of sense thanks. To bad there wasnt way to have like committee that could go through and look at guys potential. Cause the potential does have huge impact when simming a franchise. Trades seem crazy sometimes. Another cool option would be to have all potential grades just be question marks and we just have to go off ratings.

                      Comment

                      • daddies3angels
                        Rookie
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 311

                        #12
                        Re: Weird potentials

                        Something else that just came to mind is that top prospects fail all the time while other prospects come out of nowwhere. So there should be something in game where if A potential that they can fall to B or C and if a prospect is a C or B they can move up if tearing it for so long in minors.

                        Comment

                        • seanjeezy
                          The Future
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 3347

                          #13
                          Re: Weird potentials

                          Originally posted by yanksdaniel99
                          The ability of people to just import over players allows the same thing to occur. If you wanted to break the game and have a franchise of all A's it can done relatively easily (just quite time-consuming).
                          Pretty much this... The system can already be broken, we just choose not to do it because some of us prefer realism lol.

                          In fact, most of the changes I suggested were downgrades... I am in the camp that believes there are too many A's and B's in the game.
                          Bakin' soda, I got bakin' soda

                          Comment

                          • daddies3angels
                            Rookie
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 311

                            #14
                            Re: Weird potentials

                            Originally posted by seanjeezy
                            Pretty much this... The system can already be broken, we just choose not to do it because some of us prefer realism lol.

                            In fact, most of the changes I suggested were downgrades... I am in the camp that believes there are too many A's and B's in the game.
                            I dont have problem with B's. I do think there are to many A's. When i think of A players i think of superstars. B's to me should be about 90% of the starters around MLB. 10% starters are superstars. Then most bench guys should be C's. Only A's in bullpen should be CL. All setup and middle relieve guys should be B and C. Just my opinion. Why it would be cool to be able to edit them but i understand why we cant now. My next proposition would be to make an option where i can turn potential into ? marks. Make franchise alot more fun. Just have to go off stats and ratings. Cause im not going to lie when i sim and make trades on franchise i go after A potential only. I try not to look at it but its so hard not to. Perfect example is Garza with Cubs. He a B potential but rating is very good on 12. He actually better then some A potential but if i get offered a A potential starter for him il do it cause i want to see that A potential lol

                            Comment

                            • Nooooovak
                              Rookie
                              • Jan 2012
                              • 133

                              #15
                              Re: Weird potentials

                              In terms of all the guys you downgraded in your post because they haven't proven to be anything more than a below-average to average player so far in their MLB careers: Jose Bautista, Ryan Vogelsong, Cliff Lee, and Jason Hammel (amongst others) say hi .

                              But, yeah, I would love the ability to edit potential, simply because so much of it comes down to opinion. Understand why we can't have it, though.
                              Mariners Baseball | Lakers Basketball | Rams Football

                              Comment

                              Working...