NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bjf1377
    Lurker
    • Jul 2002
    • 6620

    #16
    Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

    Most importantly, by paying attention tot he background, it looks as if Kent State will have their stadium in the game finally (even though they are re-doing it, so that won't really be accurate, haha)

    Comment

    • Sportsforever
      NL MVP
      • Mar 2005
      • 20368

      #17
      Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

      Originally posted by AuburnAlumni
      Typical.

      Florida...with a defense that resembled Swiss Cheese gets a 91 rating.

      Auburn...with a defense that finished #6 in the nation (and has finished in the top 10 nationally SEVEN straight years) defensively gets a 79 rating.

      This had better change substantially before release EA.
      I thought these ratings were based on this upcoming year...not on last year? If it was based on last year, I would put UF's defense in the low 70's. If it's based on this upcoming year, who knows what it should be.
      "People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby

      Comment

      • AuburnAlumni
        War Eagle
        • Jul 2002
        • 11939

        #18
        Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

        Originally posted by Sportsforever
        I thought these ratings were based on this upcoming year...not on last year? If it was based on last year, I would put UF's defense in the low 70's. If it's based on this upcoming year, who knows what it should be.
        Ok...

        If it's based on this year, the same applies. No way AU should have a 79 rating and no way Florida should have a 90.
        AUBURN TIGERS
        MINNESOTA VIKINGS
        INDIANA PACERS

        Comment

        • callmetaternuts
          All Star
          • Jul 2004
          • 7045

          #19
          Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

          Originally posted by AuburnAlumni
          Typical.

          Florida...with a defense that resembled Swiss Cheese gets a 91 rating.

          Auburn...with a defense that finished #6 in the nation (and has finished in the top 10 nationally SEVEN straight years) defensively gets a 79 rating.

          This had better change substantially before release EA.
          Haha, i knew you'd be one of the first to post on this. im surprised how low Auburn is also.
          Check out my Tampa Bay Buccaneers CFM Thread.

          You too can be a 5* recruit at FSU.......

          Originally posted by TwelveozPlaya21
          add worthless Xavier Lee to that list..
          Originally posted by MassNole
          CFL here he comes. Pfft, wait that would require learning a playbook. McDonalds here he comes.

          Comment

          • georgiafan
            Hall Of Fame
            • Jul 2002
            • 11167

            #20
            Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

            Originally posted by AuburnAlumni
            Ok...

            If it's based on this year, the same applies. No way AU should have a 79 rating and no way Florida should have a 90.
            Yeah Auburn really got ther shaft if the ratings stay like this. The UF pass defense was terrible, but since they have several 5 star recruits they will be rated high on defense.
            Retro Redemption - Starting over with a oldschool PowerBone Offense

            My Youtube

            Twitter

            PS5 ID = BubbasCruise

            Comment

            • noplace
              MVP
              • Jul 2004
              • 2121

              #21
              Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

              Originally posted by Sportsforever
              I thought these ratings were based on this upcoming year...not on last year? If it was based on last year, I would put UF's defense in the low 70's. If it's based on this upcoming year, who knows what it should be.
              No matter how you put it Fla defense shouldnt be ranked higher than a 85 IMO..Thats based on talent alone & Auburn should def be in the 90's although they lost Muschamp. FSU & Miami's Offense shouldnt be ranked higher than 79 IMO.
              PSN: Somo23P



              Nebraska Cornhuskers
              Washington Redskins
              Miami Heat

              Comment

              • jdrhammer
                MVP
                • Feb 2008
                • 1287

                #22
                Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                Originally posted by gschwendt
                Any chance we could get a typed-out list or something zoomed in to the right side itself? I realize beggars can't be choosers but I can't read hardly any of them... at least not the ones I'm interested in.
                Yeah, that would be nice. I can see Ole Miss' numbers. I think it is:

                72 OVR
                72 OFF
                70 DEF

                I think that is it. I was trying to see Miss. State's and it was blurry as hell. Any help?

                Comment

                • coogrfan
                  In Fritz We Trust
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 15646

                  #23
                  Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                  Originally posted by bjf1377
                  Most importantly, by paying attention tot he background, it looks as if Kent State will have their stadium in the game finally (even though they are re-doing it, so that won't really be accurate, haha)
                  Good eye, sir.

                  Rice Stadium: yea or nay?


                  Comment

                  • Brandwin
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 30621

                    #24
                    Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                    I couldn't make out Baylor's ratings. They all looked like they were in the 40s to me. =/

                    Comment

                    • Coach Bryant
                      Roll Tide!
                      • May 2003
                      • 4372

                      #25
                      Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                      Good thing we can edit the rosters.
                      ‎"What I would like for every football team to do that we play is to sit there and say, I hate playing against these guys." -Nick Saban

                      Comment

                      • peteykirch
                        Banned
                        • Apr 2006
                        • 3944

                        #26
                        Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                        Rutgers looked to be 84's across the board.

                        Comment

                        • countryboy
                          Growing pains
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 52865

                          #27
                          Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                          Louisville's defense didn't have a rating, it just said....

                          Louisville defense: haha


                          I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.

                          I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(


                          Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals

                          Comment

                          • AuburnAlumni
                            War Eagle
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 11939

                            #28
                            Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                            Originally posted by countryboy
                            Louisville's defense didn't have a rating, it just said....

                            Louisville defense: haha




                            I found it...

                            Louisville
                            Offense: 89
                            Defense: -23
                            AUBURN TIGERS
                            MINNESOTA VIKINGS
                            INDIANA PACERS

                            Comment

                            • countryboy
                              Growing pains
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 52865

                              #29
                              Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                              Originally posted by AuburnAlumni


                              I found it...

                              Louisville
                              Offense: 89
                              Defense: -23


                              Our defense is improving.
                              I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.

                              I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(


                              Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals

                              Comment

                              • bjf1377
                                Lurker
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 6620

                                #30
                                Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

                                Originally posted by coogrfan
                                Good eye, sir.

                                Rice Stadium: yea or nay?


                                Its harder to tell on that one, but I'm gonna say yea just cause of the position of the scoreboard. I'm gonna keep an eye on the MAC schools when I watch it again just to see how much progress they've made (doesn't look like they have Ohio U in there yet tho)

                                EDIT: Nevermind, it looks like KSU is generic after all......Ball State = Good, Kent State = Generic, Buffalo = Good, Bowling Green = Generic, Central Michigan = Generic, Eastern Michigan = Good
                                Last edited by bjf1377; 05-10-2008, 01:23 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...