MLB 2K13 Gameplay Videos - Orioles vs. Blue Jays & Dodgers vs. A's

[N51_rob]

I know it's hard guys, but don't feed the trolls; Report them.

[celtics6]

me personally i'd love to see real variety in these games and stuff happens that is like i can't believe they put that in there. But game companies just don't do that anymore. It used to be like that back in the day. But most of these companies just refine and rehash these days.

The Show has their model and has been rehashing this entire gen as well. Look at any easports game. 2k took it to another level.

most of these developers aren't even developers anymore. They are like car salesman. It's like a new version of the honda accord. Same car I was driving 10 years ago.

It's not cool to be nerdy and innovative.

[SynShadowzz]

How can any blame fall to 2K, really?

Look, it was MLB who wanted the game published. 2K had no intention of making another MLB game, and when the league was made aware that they wouldn't have a game on the 360, they cut 2K a deal w/ licensing and said "put something out."

2K really had no choice, they did what they could.

If $60.00 is too much for you, then maybe you've got your priorities in check and you spend wisely.

Otherwise, I want to play baseball this season and I don't want the same rosters / league alignment from last year.

So I'll spend the $60, and thank 2K/MLB for giving me a newer game to play this year.

[Baile]

Quote: Originally Posted by celtics6

It's basically the same game as well.

... and has been since 2006 actually, lum dum dee dum...

[celtics6]

Quote: Originally Posted by SynShadowzz

How can any blame fall to 2K, really? Look, it was MLB who wanted the game published. 2K had no intention of making another MLB game, and when the league was made aware that they wouldn't have a game on the 360, they cut 2K a deal w/ licensing and said "put something out." 2K really had no choice, they did what they could. If $60.00 is too much for you, then maybe you've got your priorities in check and you spend wisely. Otherwise, I want to play baseball this season and I don't want the same rosters / league alignment from last year. So I'll spend the $60, and thank 2K/MLB for giving me a newer game to play this year.

This is the problem right there though, is the consumer has been beaten up to the point where they just accept this stuff. Where's that at&t commercial about we want more when you need it. I Want to see drunk fans running out onto the field half naked being chased by the police during the game. I want to see bats flying into the stands. Players taking curtain calls. All that stuff.

[Baile]

Quote: Originally Posted by SynShadowzz

2K really had no choice, they did what they could.

Isn't that like saying someone who never takes care of their lawn for five years, has no choice but to look at a yard full of weeds all summer? Or some analogy like that, heh.

[celtics6]

too many sheeple out there these days. Everything is so processed and about the bottom line. These companies won't do anything unless they have to.

[Baile]

Quote: Originally Posted by SynShadowzz

Look, it was MLB who wanted the game published. 2K had no intention of making another MLB game, and when the league was made aware that they wouldn't have a game on the 360, they cut 2K a deal w/ licensing and said "put something out." 2K really had no choice, they did what they could.

Have to back up a bit after rereading this. You say they had "no choice but to cut a deal"? Wouldn't another choice have been to not cut a deal so as not to release a poor game, knowing they didn't have the time? They chose to take the money and run. You make it sound like MLB twisted their arm.