The Curious Case of Charles Barkley, and NBA 2K12

[statum71]

The Chuckster is my guy, Reggie Miller too.

But oh well......we've got plenty more to enjoy.

[NINJAK2]

Quote: Originally Posted by magicman30

Maybe we as the proud patrons of the greatest basketball game ever NBA 2K11 have to do the unthinkable in order to voice our displeasure in not having Sir Charles in the game .... THREATEN TO NOT BUY THE GAME by FLOODING THEIR FACEBOOK, TWITTER, & 2K FORUMS UNTIL THEY DO SO! see if they & Barkleys camp are able to come up with a compromise then!

You want to hurt 2k for what Chuck is doing? That makes no sense..Chuck can care less what people think and he has made that fact known his whole life...

[youvalss]

I wish it was the opposite. I wish Barkley was in the game so that I could see/use him as a player, rather than a real-life announcer (I can't stand him off the court, and I change the channel many times he's on). But what can you do?

Life is too short for focusing on one player, as great as he is/was. Moving on...

[24]

Quote: Originally Posted by LAKERSFAN89

97-98 lakers arent the focus its about john stockton whatever great moment he had against them

but the kings from 2002 are in the game so shouldn't the lakers be there as well?

[neptuneniq]

Quote: Originally Posted by poopydude

but the kings from 2002 are in the game so shouldn't the lakers be there as well?

why does it matter haha u got kobe and shaq already isnt that enough?

01-02 Kings were added as bonus content, and believe it or not is one of the more popular teams that were requested

they killed 2 birds with one stone

[youvalss]

Quote: Originally Posted by poopydude

but the kings from 2002 are in the game so shouldn't the lakers be there as well?

If we also had some "great moments" of NBA referees - yes.

[sportjames23]

Quote: Originally Posted by magicman30

Maybe we as the proud patrons of the greatest basketball game ever NBA 2K11 have to do the unthinkable in order to voice our displeasure in not having Sir Charles in the game .... THREATEN TO NOT BUY THE GAME by FLOODING THEIR FACEBOOK, TWITTER, & 2K FORUMS UNTIL THEY DO SO! see if they & Barkleys camp are able to come up with a compromise then!

Hell, no. I'm not gonna miss out on all this goodness just because of Chuck, no matter how much I want him in the game.

[eko718]

Quote: Originally Posted by J_Posse512

You seem to be missing the point, but it isn't about the Lakers. They used the 1998 Jazz/Lakers because they already had many of the players agreed to previously, that is the same team from Malone's challenge, and that is the team that lost to Chicago for the second time in the Finals. Giving us the '98 Spurs (young Tim Duncan) and Lakers (young Kobe/prime Shaq) is a bonus going against the Jazz. They easily could've gone with the Rockets (sans Barkley) or the Sonics (already included), but they threw current fans of Duncan and Bryant a bone. Thanks for the love shown to two of the greatest ever, VC.

You didn't get the point of what I said, but it doesn't matter one way or the other. It is what it is.