Top 25 in NCAA '08

[hawkeyekid]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheGamingChef

Haha, are you serious?!? Man that is tight... but ridiculous. ISU is high 70s/low 80s. I would be happy with an 83.

That 89 score is for Iowa, not Iowa State. I think Iowa State was rated 82 or 83.

[georgiafan]

what video did you get these ratings from ?

[dagger55]

Quote: Originally Posted by rollinphat

I mean seriously...is EA just afraid to hurt somebodies feelings with these ratings? I love Duke and all, but come on. 80 overall 83 offense 73 defense 77 special teams HAAHAHAHAHA more like offense = F defense = F special teams = F the totaled 283 yds a game on O they gave up 395 yds a game on D the punter averaged 37 yds a punt and they were 4 for 11 on field goals. they were outscored 406-179 (33.8-14.9) during their 0-12 season. 2004 = 2-9 2005 = 1-10 2006 = 0-12 The 3 year record? Try 3-31. I think that's good enough for an overall team rating of a B myself. HAHAHAHAAHAHA

Duke's offense is rated two points less than Auburn's....


And Auburn is only 5 points better than Duke in total ranking...

Duke has us beat by 14 in the special teams department

[mcculac]

Quote: Originally Posted by dagger55

Duke's offense is rated two points less than Auburn's.... And Auburn is only 5 points better than Duke in total ranking... Duke has us beat by 14 in the special teams department

yeah, someone posted Duke's 3 season record as 3-31 or something similar. Reverse that and you basically have Auburn's 3 year record, yet the two teams are separated by 5 overall points. good stuff, EA.

what I dont understand is how Auburn is (supposedly) ranked 13th, yet their overall (once again, supposedly) rating puts them with Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Kentucky between 5-8 in the SEC.

[olemiss86]

Ole Miss was like at an 87 in offense. I was surprised were rated that high at first but then I started thinking, we are returning I think all but like one or two guys from our offense, and we have a huge RB in BenJarvs Green Ellis. So we could have a steady rushing team this year.

[bigeastbumrush]

I haven't decided which one of these I'm using.

Quote: Originally Posted by theaub

6) West Virginia 11) Louisville 20) Rutgers

More than likely Louisville, then Rutgers and lastly WVU.

[TheGamingChef]

Quote: Originally Posted by hawkeyekid

That 89 score is for Iowa, not Iowa State. I think Iowa State was rated 82 or 83.

OK, that's right on the money for ISU. But that's still a ridiculous overrating of Iowa.

They go 6-7, lose their starting QB, and are rated 89? C'mon EA.

[Cebby]

Quote: Originally Posted by olemiss86

Ole Miss was like at an 87 in offense. I was surprised were rated that high at first but then I started thinking, we are returning I think all but like one or two guys from our offense, and we have a huge RB in BenJarvs Green Ellis. So we could have a steady rushing team this year.

3 or 4 years ago, Vanderbilt returned 22 of 24 starters. You know what happened? 2-9 happened.

Ole Miss does not deserve an 87 for their offense.

Ole Miss' offense was ranked 11th in the country. From the bottom.

Ole Miss averaged 10 PPG against teams with winning records.

The only major offensive category in which Ole Miss was ranked in the top 100 was rush yardage per game.

Ole Miss is an embarrassment to the SEC, USC, the south, the NCAA, and the game of football in general.