Despite Flaws, NCAA 09 a Great Experience

[metallicatz]

Quote: Originally Posted by sportyguyfl31

Anyone who is claiming that they have little to no defensive issues, is a stone cold liar. Plain and simple. This game is a defensive atrocity.

Or maybe you just suck. Playing as Arizona State i've had tight low scoring games with both USC and Georgia. Here'es a thought.....spend some time actually trying to learn how to play the game instead of spending all your time here whining about it. Maybe then you'll get better.


Once again, the hateful whiners have hijacked another thread. The names are always the same too. Coincidence? I think not.

[nightcreeper]

Quote: Originally Posted by PaperLantern

Definitely one of the best football games I've played.

i agree

[Perfect Zero]

Quote: Originally Posted by metallicatz

Or maybe you just suck. Playing as Arizona State i've had tight low scoring games with both USC and Georgia. Here'es a thought.....spend some time actually trying to learn how to play the game instead of spending all your time here whining about it. Maybe then you'll get better. Once again, the hateful whiners have hijacked another thread. The names are always the same too. Coincidence? I think not.

I highly doubt that. I want to know, how many sacks per game are you getting? If you say more than .5, you're a lier. I wan to know how many passes your opposing quarterback is getting. If you say anything lower than 65% of them, you're lying.

The worst part is, this game graphicly looks wonderful. Yet, you can't buy a painting just because it has pretty colors. There has to be technique, there has to be substance. EA has a pretty game, but a broken system.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by Perfect Zero

I highly doubt that. I want to know, how many sacks per game are you getting? If you say more than .5, you're a lier. I wan to know how many passes your opposing quarterback is getting. If you say anything lower than 65% of them, you're lying. The worst part is, this game graphicly looks wonderful. Yet, you can't buy a painting just because it has pretty colors. There has to be technique, there has to be substance. EA has a pretty game, but a broken system.

I guess I am lying because I have held the CPU to less than 65% more than once, and easily get more than .5 sacks per game.

BTW it's liar, not lier.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by metallicatz

Once again, the hateful whiners have hijacked another thread. The names are always the same too. Coincidence? I think not.

It's like that every year.

[Perfect Zero]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

I guess I am lying because I have held the CPU to less than 65% more than once, and easily get more than .5 sacks per game.

So you openly admit to lying? Over a video game? Get a life man.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by Perfect Zero

So you openly admit to lying? Over a video game? Get a life man.

LOL, hardly. I was just disputing your claim. I have held the CPU under 65%, several times. Getting more than .5 sacks a game as you put it all the time as well.

As far as getting a life. Maybe you should heed your own advice.

[GoVols1985]

Quote: Originally Posted by Perfect Zero

So you openly admit to lying? Over a video game? Get a life man.

Who needs a life when you've got video games?