Prima Guide NCAA Football 2004 Ratings

[RamsCanes]

Could you post Miami's ratings please?

Also, if its not a big hassle could you also post their offensive formations?

Thank you!

[Buffs2002]

RUTGERS
ALL 66 QB 75 RB 70 WR 72 OL 75 DL 75 LB 77 DB 77 ST 79

TAMU
ALL 90 QB 88 RB 91 WR 85 OL 85 DL 78 LB 83 DB 87 ST 95

TEXAS
ALL 99 QB 86 RB 94 WR 96 OL 91 DL 90 LB 91 DB 86 ST 99

SYRACUSE
ALL 81 QB 83 RB 91 WR 82 OL 84 DL 81 LB 79 DB 78 ST 80

MIAMI
ALL 99 QB 89 RB 96 WR 94 OL 97 DL 88 LB 95 DB 95 ST 92
FORMATIONS: ACE BUNCH, ACE SLOT, ACE TRIPS, ACE Y TRIPS, I FORM NORMAL, I FORM TIGHT, SHOTGUN -NORMAL AND Y TRIPS, STRONG NORMAL.

[Packbacker96]

So, does the guide have the offensive formations for all the teams? If so, can you give me the formations for NC State? Thanks.

[RamsCanes]

Does the strategy guide have diagrams of the formations or does it just list which teams have which formations?

I heard somewhere that the game had something like 10 new formations. Does it say anywhere in the guide what they are?

[Buffs2002]

NC State's offensive sets:
ace normal, ace y twins, I form tight, shotgu 2b slot, shotgun 5 wide, shotgun ace twins, shotgun trips, shotgun y trips, strong twins.

They list them just like I did and then they give two diagrams of key plays for each team. NC State's diagrams are I form tight-rollout and shotgun trips-hookouts.

[Buffs2002]

New offensive sets (at least from what I remember)..

Ace empty, ace big, ace bunch, flexbone split (I think this is new), power T, shotgun bunch,

Defense:

They are all the same formations it looks like but there are new plays within each formation. Although it's hard to tell, there are no diagrams and some look like the same plays but with different names. One cool thing is that it looks like your DL will line up in different spots for some calls. Example, nickel fire green. This is where the LB and nickel back blitz and the d-tackles are lined up wide. With the nickel thunder green, the tackles line up tight instead. We'll have to see how it goes.

[guy_incognito]

Quote:

---

Buffs2002 said:

Iowa
ALL 93 QB 82 RB 93 WR 83 OL 88 DL 90 LB 87 DB 85 ST 99

---

Any other Iowa fans out there totally shocked at this? Aren't they picked to finish the Big 10 in the middle of the pack? Purdue, Michigan, Ohio State, and the Badgers ahead of them? That is a pretty big jump in ratings year on year. Not that I am bitching.....

[breinke]

Quote:

---

guy_incognito said:

Quote:

---

Buffs2002 said:

Iowa
ALL 93 QB 82 RB 93 WR 83 OL 88 DL 90 LB 87 DB 85 ST 99

---

Any other Iowa fans out there totally shocked at this? Aren't they picked to finish the Big 10 in the middle of the pack? Purdue, Michigan, Ohio State, and the Badgers ahead of them? That is a pretty big jump in ratings year on year. Not that I am bitching.....

---

Completely shocked by this---didn't we lose our whole Offensive Line??? Don't we have huge questions as to the capability at QB and DLine? I love when the Hawkeyes get respect but this may be too much-oh well it will be fun to run them through a dynasty