It can't really be changed, but my gripe with ESPN presentation

[Landlordos7]

First of all, it's apparent that this game will be a far cry from looking like an actual, REAL ESPN telecast, what with the impossible replay angles and the more-than-likely lacking cutscene storyboards.


With that being said...

I would infinitely prefer it if EA would just use high-res video clips of things such as the replay wipe, instead of actually rendering it inside the graphics engine. There is a notable difference, and while it may not bother some (and that is good on you), it bugs me.

That's all. Your thoughts?

[TheGipper86]

I personally thought the graphics rendering looks awesome. While it may not be perfect, it still beats the hell out of anything else I could see them doing.

[moylan1234]

for a replay wipe you can't just use a clip that you record off tv. a replay wipe is a keyed element meaning it has to be married to the image behind it with production equipment. I guess they could get a hold of ESPNs wipe, but it would most likely take more money and time than it's worth. also, I like it better the way it is because it keeps the graphic look consistent throughout the game.

[Pokes404]

I know people want the "real" broadcast angles, but I'm glad they're doing something different. I've already seen EA's attempt at replicating authentic broadcast angles the past few years and what we got were boring replays. I want the play on the field to be as realistic as possible, but when it comes to presentation, I'm willing to let things slide and give them some room for creativity (as long as it's done well).

[JerzeyReign]

Why even say anything negative about a game that YOU haven't even played yet? Their workin' their @$$ off but yet some feel its' alright to continously complain. Really? Relax, they may have an angle where you say 'wow' I wish TV had that angle.

Me personally I think its' great their even implementing things now, plus by month 4 of playing the game I'll probably be skippin' 'em anyway

[Husker88Chief]

I like the theory behind broadcast angles, but most of them simply aren't playable. I have no interest in controlling my QB when looking straight down the LOS.

The great thing about football video games like NCAA Football is the mesh of on-the-field play and broadcasting. I like things like replay wipes and ESPN's presentation, but mixing in other camera angles is risking damaging the gameplay.

I know I speak for myself and others when in NCAA and Madden on big plays and 4th downs the camera would take an "intense" or "creative" angle, which only led to distracting my gameplay, often leading to a missed field goal or passing near a cornerback the screen woudn't let you see.

It's a neat idea, but in the end it comes down to gameplay. If it hurts gameplay, take it out, if it has no effect on gameplay, by all means lets see it.

[ODogg]

What Husker said....

[TheGipper86]

Quote: Originally Posted by Husker88Chief

I like the theory behind broadcast angles, but most of them simply aren't playable. I have no interest in controlling my QB when looking straight down the LOS. The great thing about football video games like NCAA Football is the mesh of on-the-field play and broadcasting. I like things like replay wipes and ESPN's presentation, but mixing in other camera angles is risking damaging the gameplay. I know I speak for myself and others when in NCAA and Madden on big plays and 4th downs the camera would take an "intense" or "creative" angle, which only led to distracting my gameplay, often leading to a missed field goal or passing near a cornerback the screen woudn't let you see. It's a neat idea, but in the end it comes down to gameplay. If it hurts gameplay, take it out, if it has no effect on gameplay, by all means lets see it.

+1.
But don't tell the Backbreaker people about this.